Evaluating Mobile Health Apps for Customized Dietary Recording for Young Adults and Seniors: Randomized Controlled Trial

Background The role of individual-tailored dietary recording in mobile phone health apps has become increasingly important in management of self-health care and population-based preventive service. The development of such mobile apps for user-centered designing is still challengeable and requires further scientific evidence. Objective This study aims to conduct a randomized trial to assess the accuracy and time efficiency of two prototypes for dietary recoding utilization related to the input method of food intake. Methods We first present an innovative combinatorial concept for dietary recording to account for dish variation. One prototype was a self-chosen tab app that featured choosing each food ingredient to synthesize an individual dish, whereas the other was an autonomous exhaustive list app that provided one selection from a comprehensive list of dish items. The concept included commercially available choices that allowed users to more accurately account for their individual food selection. The two mobile apps were compared in a head-to-head parallel randomized trial evaluation. Young adults (n=70, aged 18-29) and older adults (n=35, aged 55-73) were recruited and randomized into two groups for accuracy and response time evaluation based on 12 types of food items in use of the developed self-chosen tab and autonomous exhaustive list apps, respectively. Results For the trials based on the self-chosen tab (53 participants) and autonomous exhaustive list groups (52 participants), the two prototypes were found to be highly accurate (>98%). The self-chosen tab app was found to be more efficient, requiring significantly less time for input of 11 of 12 items (P<.05). The self-chosen tab users occasionally neglected to select food attributes, an issue which did not occur in the autonomous exhaustive list group. Conclusions Our study contributes through the scientific evaluation of the transformation step into prototype development to demonstrate that a self-chosen tab app has potentially better opportunity in effectiveness and efficiency. The combinatorial concept offers potential for dietary recording and planning which can account for high food item variability. Our findings on prototype development of diversified dietary recordings provide design consideration and user interaction for related further app development and improvement. Trial Registration ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN86142301; http://www.isrctn.com/ ISRCTN86142301 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/74YLEPYnS)

其他： yes: all primary outcomes were signi cantly better in intervention group vs control partly: SOME primary outcomes were signi cantly better in intervention group vs control no statistically signi cant difference between control and intervention potentially harmful: control was signi cantly better than intervention in one or more outcomes inconclusive: more research is needed 其他： Approx. Percentage of Users (starters) still using the app as recommended after 3 months * 1a) TITLE: Identi cation as a randomized trial in the title 1a-i) Identify the mode of delivery in the title Identify the mode of delivery. Preferably use "web-based" and/or "mobile" and/or "electronic game" in the title. Avoid ambiguous terms like "online", "virtual", "interactive". Use "Internet-based" only if Intervention includes non-web-based Internet components (e.g. email), use "computer-based" or "electronic" only if o ine products are used. Use "virtual" only in the context of "virtual reality" (3-D worlds). Use "online" only in the context of "online support groups". Complement or substitute product names with broader terms for the class of products (such as "mobile" or "smart phone" instead of "iphone"), especially if the application runs on different platforms.
Does your paper address subitem 1a-i? * Copy and paste relevant sections from manuscript title (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Mobile Health Application on Customized Dietary Recording ( direct quotes from our manuscript title)

1a-ii) Non-web-based components or important co-interventions in title
Mention non-web-based components or important co-interventions in title, if any (e.g., "with telephone support").
Does your paper address subitem 1a-ii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from manuscript title (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 1a-iii) Primary condition or target group in the title Mention primary condition or target group in the title, if any (e.g., "for children with Type I Diabetes") Example: A Web-based and Mobile Intervention with Telephone Support for Children with Type I Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial Does your paper address subitem 1a-iii? * Copy and paste relevant sections from manuscript title (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study for Young Adults and Elders ( direct quotes from our manuscript title)

1b-i) Key features/functionalities/components of the intervention and comparator in the METHODS section of the ABSTRACT
Mention key features/functionalities/components of the intervention and comparator in the abstract. If possible, also mention theories and principles used for designing the site. Keep in mind the needs of systematic reviewers and indexers by including important synonyms. (Note: Only report in the abstract what the main paper is reporting. If this information is missing from the main body of text, consider adding it) Does your paper address subitem 1b-i? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript abstract (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study We rst present an innovative combinatorial concept for dietary recording to account for dish variation. The SCT features with choosing each food ingredient to synthesize an individual dish, while the AEL provides one selection from a comprehensive list of dish items. The concept includes commercial available choices that allow users to more accurately account for their individual food selection. Clarify the level of human involvement in the abstract, e.g., use phrases like "fully automated" vs. "therapist/nurse/care provider/physician-assisted" (mention number and expertise of providers involved, if any). (Note: Only report in the abstract what the main paper is reporting. If this information is missing from the main body of text, consider adding it) Does your paper address subitem 1b-ii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript abstract (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Young adults (n = 70) and older adults (n=35) were recruited and randomized into two groups for accuracy and response time evaluation based on 12 types of food items in use of the developed SCT and AEL respectively.( direct quotes from our manuscript abstract) 1b-iii) Open vs. closed, web-based (self-assessment) vs. face-toface assessments in the METHODS section of the ABSTRACT Mention how participants were recruited (online vs. o ine), e.g., from an open access website or from a clinic or a closed online user group (closed usergroup trial), and clarify if this was a purely web-based trial, or there were face-to-face components (as part of the intervention or for assessment). Clearly say if outcomes were self-assessed through questionnaires (as common in web-based trials Does your paper address subitem 1b-iv? Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript abstract (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Using the trial based on SCT (53 participants) and AEL groups (52 participants), the two prototypes were found to be highly effective on accuracy (above 98%). SCT was found to be more timely e cient, requiring signi cantly less time for input of 11 of the 12 items (p<0.05).( direct quotes from our manuscript abstract) 1b-v) CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSION in abstract for negative trials Conclusions/Discussions in abstract for negative trials: Discuss the primary outcome -if the trial is negative (primary outcome not changed), and the intervention was not used, discuss whether negative results are attributable to lack of uptake and discuss reasons. (Note: Only report in the abstract what the main paper is reporting. If this information is missing from the main body of text, consider adding it) Does your paper address subitem 1b-v?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript abstract (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Our study contributes through the scienti c evaluation of the transformation step into prototype development to demonstrate that SCT has a better opportunity in effectiveness and e ciency.( direct quotes from our manuscript abstract)

2a-i) Problem and the type of system/solution
Describe the problem and the type of system/solution that is object of the study: intended as standalone intervention vs. incorporated in broader health care program? Intended for a particular patient population? Goals of the intervention, e.g., being more cost-effective to other interventions, replace or complement other solutions? (Note: Details about the intervention are provided in "Methods" under 5) 1 2 3 4 5 essential 2b) In INTRODUCTION: Speci c objectives or hypotheses Does your paper address subitem 2a-i? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study New methods are still lacking to prescribe individualized food alternatives that not only provide valid intake data, but also suit for different types of users.
Recently, providing more innovative and effective in digital health interventions has been emphasize. In this study, we investigate the prototyping step of mobile health application, prototypes commonly evolve from concept in more than one design variant. ( direct quotes from our manuscript introduction) Does your paper address subitem 2a-ii? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study In this study, we investigate the prototyping step of mobile health application, prototypes commonly evolve from concept in more than one design variant (i.e., divergent steps) [13]. The usability of these design variants are rarely subjected to systematic evaluation, and lack comparative evidence from user interaction. This research conducts a scienti c evaluation to explicate the differences of the two design variants. The consolidated statistical results provide a better understanding of prototype suitability. Several pilot studies have attempted to develop and evaluate prototypes [18,19,20]. However, such attempts have largely neglected to consider design variants and conducting formal usability evaluation. ( direct quotes from our manuscript introduction) METHODS 3a) Description of trial design (such as parallel, factorial) including allocation ratio 3b) Important changes to methods after trial commencement (such as eligibility criteria), with reasons subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 2b? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study This paper presents an innovative concept for selecting or creating individual meals for mobile health application. The proposed concept is used to develop two mobile applications to help users select a wide variety of food alternatives. The rst application is called self-chosen tab (SCT), and allows users to choose and click each food ingredient to synthesize a food. The second application is called autonomous exhaustive list (AEL), in which users scroll through and select from a comprehensive list of combined food ingredients. ( direct quotes from our manuscript introduction) Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 3a? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study A parallel two-group randomized trial was designed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of SCT and AEL. The study protocol was reviewed by the Ethics Committee of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and received approval from the Institutional Review Board (103-2745B). ( direct quotes from our manuscript method) Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 3b? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study none 3b-i) Bug xes, Downtimes, Content Changes Bug xes, Downtimes, Content Changes: ehealth systems are often dynamic systems. A description of changes to methods therefore also includes important changes made on the intervention or comparator during the trial (e.g., major bug xes or changes in the functionality or content) (5-iii) and other "unexpected events" that may have in uenced study design such as staff Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study none Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 4a? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Participants who aged over 18 and 50 were eligible for recruitment through local hospitals and colleges. Informed consent were acquired following online registration. Those who have severe diseases were excluded. ( direct quotes from our manuscript method)

4a-i) Computer / Internet literacy
Computer / Internet literacy is often an implicit "de facto" eligibility criterion -this should be explicitly clari ed.
Does your paper address subitem 4a-i?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study For the collegiate students' recruitment, we announced and introduced this study owchart and contents before course start, which was carried out by one master student. The contact information will be noted by the end of illustration, which can be reached for participation registry. On the other hand, the elders were introduced this study by the research assistant in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. ( direct quotes from our manuscript method) 4a-ii) Open vs. closed, web-based vs. face-to-face assessments: Open vs. closed, web-based vs. face-to-face assessments: Mention how participants were recruited (online vs. o ine), e.g., from an open access website or from a clinic, and clarify if this was a purely web-based trial, or there were face-to-face components (as part of the intervention or for assessment), i.e., to what degree got the study team to know the participant. In online-only trials, clarify if participants were quasi-anonymous and whether having multiple identities was possible or whether technical or logistical measures (e.g., cookies, email con rmation, phone calls) were used to detect/prevent these. Does your paper address subitem 4a-ii? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study For the collegiate students' recruitment, we announced and introduced this study owchart and contents before course start, which was carried out by one master student. The contact information will be noted by the end of illustration, which can be reached for participation registry. On the other hand, the elders were introduced this study by the research assistant in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. ( direct quotes from our manuscript method) 4a-iii) Information giving during recruitment Information given during recruitment. Specify how participants were briefed for recruitment and in the informed consent procedures (e.g., publish the informed consent documentation as appendix, see also item X26), as this information may have an effect on user self-selection, user expectation and may also bias results.
Does your paper address subitem 4a-iii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study For those who were willing to participate will be noted on the list. Baseline data and informed consent were acquired following registration.( direct quotes from our manuscript method) Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 4b? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Participants who aged over 18 and 50 were eligible for recruitment through local hospitals and colleges respectively ( direct quotes from our manuscript method).
4b-i) Report if outcomes were (self-)assessed through online questionnaires Clearly report if outcomes were (self-)assessed through online questionnaires (as common in webbased trials) or otherwise.
subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 5) The interventions for each group with su cient details to allow replication, including how and when they were actually administered subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential Does your paper address subitem 4b-i? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study none 4b-ii) Report how institutional a liations are displayed Report how institutional a liations are displayed to potential participants [on ehealth media], as a liations with prestigious hospitals or universities may affect volunteer rates, use, and reactions with regards to an intervention.(Not a required item -describe only if this may bias results) Does your paper address subitem 4b-ii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study none 5-i) Mention names, credential, a liations of the developers, sponsors, and owners Mention names, credential, a liations of the developers, sponsors, and owners [6] (if authors/evaluators are owners or developer of the software, this needs to be declared in a "Con ict of interest" section or mentioned elsewhere in the manuscript).
Does your paper address subitem 5-i?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Disclosure: The authors declare no con icts.

5-ii) Describe the history/development process
Describe the history/development process of the application and previous formative evaluations (e.g., focus groups, usability testing), as these will have an impact on adoption/use rates and help with interpreting results.
subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential Does your paper address subitem 5-ii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Based on the concept, two prototypes were implemented in the Android operating system for use in mobile devices. The two prototypes share a common interface and procedures for selecting food groups and subgroups. The two prototypes then differ in terms of operations used to determine corresponding food attributes. SCT allows users to choose required food attribute(s) to compose a food item. In AEL, users scroll through and select from a comprehensive list of food items including different food attributes. ( direct quotes from our manuscript method)

5-iii) Revisions and updating
Revisions and updating. Clearly mention the date and/or version number of the application/intervention (and comparator, if applicable) evaluated, or describe whether the intervention underwent major changes during the evaluation process, or whether the development and/or content was "frozen" during the trial. Describe dynamic components such as news feeds or changing content which may have an impact on the replicability of the intervention (for unexpected events see item 3b).
Does your paper address subitem 5-iii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study This study investigated prototypes. No changes were made during the intervention.

5-iv) Quality assurance methods
Provide information on quality assurance methods to ensure accuracy and quality of information provided [1], if applicable.
Does your paper address subitem 5-iv?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Application usability was assessed in terms of accuracy and response time as primary endpoint in the task of reporting the food items. Accuracy was de ned as the number of correct counts divided by the overall counts. ( direct quotes from our manuscript method) subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 5-v) Ensure replicability by publishing the source code, and/or providing screenshots/screen-capture video, and/or providing owcharts of the algorithms used Ensure replicability by publishing the source code, and/or providing screenshots/screen-capture video, and/or providing owcharts of the algorithms used. Replicability (i.e., other researchers should in principle be able to replicate the study) is a hallmark of scienti c reporting.
Does your paper address subitem 5-v?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study The meals (see Supplemental Media 5) were prepared with real food in appropriate portions, and presented consistently on a plate throughout the experiment. All food items were accompanied by clearly visible and comprehensible labels to prevent errors due to misidenti cation. ( direct quotes from our manuscript method)

5-vi) Digital preservation
Digital preservation: Provide the URL of the application, but as the intervention is likely to change or disappear over the course of the years; also make sure the intervention is archived (Internet Archive, webcitation.org, and/or publishing the source code or screenshots/videos alongside the article). As pages behind login screens cannot be archived, consider creating demo pages which are accessible without login.
Does your paper address subitem 5-vi?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study "Correct" was de ned as the subject selecting the correct main food ingredient(s) as well as the correct food attribute(s) for each of the 12 items, given unlimited switching among groups and/or subgroups. Response time was

5-vii) Access
Access: Describe how participants accessed the application, in what setting/context, if they had to pay (or were paid) or not, whether they had to be a member of speci c group. If known, describe how participants obtained "access to the platform and Internet" [1]. To ensure access for editors/reviewers/readers, consider to provide a "backdoor" login account or demo mode for reviewers/readers to explore the application (also important for archiving purposes, see vi).
Does your paper address subitem 5-vii? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study supplemental videos were provided. Does your paper address subitem 5-viii? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study We rst present an innovative combinatorial concept for dietary recording to account for dish variation. The SCT features with choosing each food ingredient to synthesize an individual dish, while the AEL provides one selection from a comprehensive list of dish items. The concept includes commercial available choices that allow users to more accurately account for their individual food selection. (from our manuscript)

5-ix) Describe use parameters
Describe use parameters (e.g., intended "doses" and optimal timing for use). Clarify what instructions or recommendations were given to the user, e.g., regarding timing, frequency, heaviness of use, if any, or was the intervention used ad libitum.
subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential Does your paper address subitem 5-ix?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study This study aims to conduct the randomized trial to assess the accuracy and e ciency of the two prototypes for dietary recoding utilization, including designs of SCT (self-chosen tab) and AEL (autonomous exhaustive list) for individual dietary intakes.

5-x) Clarify the level of human involvement
Clarify the level of human involvement (care providers or health professionals, also technical assistance) in the e-intervention or as co-intervention (detail number and expertise of professionals involved, if any, as well as "type of assistance offered, the timing and frequency of the support, how it is initiated, and the medium by which the assistance is delivered". It may be necessary to distinguish between the level of human involvement required for the trial, and the level of human involvement required for a routine application outside of a RCT setting (discuss under item 21generalizability).
Does your paper address subitem 5-x?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Participants who aged over 18 and 50 were eligible for recruitment through local hospitals and colleges respectively. Informed consent were acquired following online registration. Those who have severe diseases were excluded.

5-xi) Report any prompts/reminders used
Report any prompts/reminders used: Clarify if there were prompts (letters, emails, phone calls, SMS) to use the application, what triggered them, frequency etc. It may be necessary to distinguish between the level of prompts/reminders required for the trial, and the level of prompts/reminders for a routine application outside of a RCT setting (discuss under item 21 -generalizability).
Does your paper address subitem 5-xi? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study none subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 6a) Completely de ned pre-speci ed primary and secondary outcome measures, including how and when they were assessed subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 5-xii) Describe any co-interventions (incl. training/support) Describe any co-interventions (incl. training/support): Clearly state any interventions that are provided in addition to the targeted eHealth intervention, as ehealth intervention may not be designed as stand-alone intervention. This includes training sessions and support [1]. It may be necessary to distinguish between the level of training required for the trial, and the level of training for a routine application outside of a RCT setting (discuss under item 21 -generalizability. Does your paper address subitem 5-xii? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study The assessment was performed by a research assistant who began the process by administering a basic background questionnaire. The research assistant then demonstrated the use of both applications through one meal with four food items (steamed sweet potato, boiled goose meat, stir-fried mushroom and fried tofu, and apple juice) to familiarize participants with application operation. After the demonstration, each user was allowed to practice application operation for three minutes to warm up. (copy from our manuscript) Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 6a? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Application usability was assessed in terms of accuracy and response time as primary endpoint in the task of reporting the food items. Accuracy was de ned as the number of correct counts divided by the overall counts. "Correct" was de ned as the subject selecting the correct main food ingredient(s) as well as the correct food attribute(s) for each of the 12 items, given unlimited switching among groups and/or subgroups. Response time was recorded and embedded in apps in milliseconds in terms of the time elapsed from a user's selection (clicking) at a certain main food ingredient (see Fig 1(c) or Fig 2(c)) to complete in food attribute(s) selection and to click at the "Con rm" button (see Fig 1( Describe whether and how "use" (including intensity of use/dosage) was de ned/measured/monitored (logins, log le analysis, etc.). Use/adoption metrics are important process outcomes that should be reported in any ehealth trial.
Does your paper address subitem 6a-ii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from manuscript text The assessment was performed by a research assistant who began the process by administering a basic background questionnaire. The research assistant then demonstrated the use of both applications through one meal with four food items (steamed sweet potato, boiled goose meat, stir-fried mushroom and fried tofu, and apple juice) to familiarize participants with application operation. After the demonstration, each user was allowed to practice application operation for three minutes to warm up. Each subject was asked to observe two actual meals and to record each item in one prototype. Each meal was decided to represent a typical lunch or dinner meal. The meals (see Supplemental Media 5) were prepared with real food in appropriate portions, and presented consistently on a plate throughout the experiment. All food items were accompanied by clearly visible and comprehensible labels to prevent errors due to misidenti cation.
(copy from manuscript) 6a-iii) Describe whether, how, and when qualitative feedback from participants was obtained Describe whether, how, and when qualitative feedback from participants was obtained (e.g., through emails, feedback forms, interviews, focus groups).
Does your paper address subitem 6a-iii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from manuscript text Each subject was asked to observe two actual meals and to record each item in one prototype. Each meal was decided to represent a typical lunch or dinner meal. The meals (see Supplemental Media 5) were prepared with real food in appropriate portions, and presented consistently on a plate throughout the experiment. All food items were accompanied by clearly visible and comprehensible labels to prevent errors due to misidenti cation. (copy from manuscript) 6b) Any changes to trial outcomes after the trial commenced, with reasons 7a) How sample size was determined NPT: When applicable, details of whether and how the clustering by care provides or centers was addressed subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 7b) When applicable, explanation of any interim analyses and stopping guidelines 8a) Method used to generate the random allocation sequence NPT: When applicable, how care providers were allocated to each trial group Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 6b? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study None 7a-i) Describe whether and how expected attrition was taken into account when calculating the sample size Describe whether and how expected attrition was taken into account when calculating the sample size.
Does your paper address subitem 7a-i?
Copy and paste relevant sections from manuscript title (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Given on the statistical power of 80% and two-tailed α-level of 5%, between the SCT and AEL approaches, the sample size requirement for each arm were determined 50 subjects under 10% accuracy difference and 37 subjects assumed 4 seconds mean difference with standard deviation of 6 seconds. Therefore, the minimal sample size with 50 subjects was required for each arm.
(copy from manuscript) Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 7b? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study None. Not applicable.
8b) Type of randomisation; details of any restriction (such as blocking and block size) 9) Mechanism used to implement the random allocation sequence (such as sequentially numbered containers), describing any steps taken to conceal the sequence until interventions were assigned 10) Who generated the random allocation sequence, who enrolled participants, and who assigned participants to interventions Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 8a? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study To ensure an even age distribution, two random number lists were generated by SAS software [26]. (from our manuscript) Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 8b? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study A parallel two-group randomized trial was designed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of SCT and AEL. (copy from manuscript) Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 9? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study To ensure an even age distribution, two random number lists were generated by SAS software [26]. Our recruitment and implementation were performed based on the order of randomization lists with a 1:1 ratio. Individual appointments were then made for evaluation. Overall, there are 53 (36 young adults and 17 older adults) and 52 (34 young adults and 18 older adults) subjects assigned to the SCT and AEL groups, respectively. (from our manuscript) Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 10? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Two random number lists were generated by SAS software. 11a) If done, who was blinded after assignment to interventions (for example, participants, care providers, those assessing outcomes) and how NPT: Whether or not administering co-interventions were blinded to group assignment subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 11b) If relevant, description of the similarity of interventions (this item is usually not relevant for ehealth trials as it refers to similarity of a placebo or sham intervention to a active medication/intervention) 11a-i) Specify who was blinded, and who wasn't Specify who was blinded, and who wasn't. Usually, in web-based trials it is not possible to blind the participants [1, 3] (this should be clearly acknowledged), but it may be possible to blind outcome assessors, those doing data analysis or those administering co-interventions (if any).
Does your paper address subitem 11a-i? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study All the measures, including button answers and time consumed, were automatically collected by mobile app. (from our manuscript) 11a-ii) Discuss e.g., whether participants knew which intervention was the "intervention of interest" and which one was the "comparator" Informed consent procedures (4a-ii) can create biases and certain expectations -discuss e.g., whether participants knew which intervention was the "intervention of interest" and which one was the "comparator".
Does your paper address subitem 11a-ii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study For the collegiate students' recruitment, we announced and introduced this study owchart and contents before course start, which was carried out by one master student. The contact information will be noted by the end of illustration, which can be reached for participation registry. On the other hand, the elders were introduced this study by the research assistant in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. For those who were willing to participate will be noted on the list. Baseline data and informed consent were acquired following registration.(from the manuscript) 12a) Statistical methods used to compare groups for primary and secondary outcomes NPT: When applicable, details of whether and how the clustering by care providers or centers was addressed subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 12b) Methods for additional analyses, such as subgroup analyses and adjusted analyses Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 11b? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study none Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 12a? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study We conducted a Chi-square test and t-test for dichotomous and continuous variables for proportion and mean examination of two-group comparisons respectively. When the difference in duration of task completion (measured in seconds) was used as a continuous variable, we used the independent t-test to compare the two groups based on the intention-to-treat principle. All statistical tests were two-tailed, and p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically signi cant. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software version 9.4. (from the manuscript) 12a-i) Imputation techniques to deal with attrition / missing values Imputation techniques to deal with attrition / missing values: Not all participants will use the intervention/comparator as intended and attrition is typically high in ehealth trials. Specify how participants who did not use the application or dropped out from the trial were treated in the statistical analysis (a complete case analysis is strongly discouraged, and simple imputation techniques such as LOCF may also be problematic [4]).
Does your paper address subitem 12a-i? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 12b? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study The results were conducted by young adults and elders for subgroup analysis.

X26-i) Comment on ethics committee approval
Does your paper address subitem X26-i?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study The study protocol was reviewed by the Ethics Committee of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and received approval from the Institutional Review Board (103-2745B).

x26-ii) Outline informed consent procedures
Outline informed consent procedures e.g., if consent was obtained o ine or online (how? Checkbox, etc.?), and what information was provided (see 4a-ii). See [6] for some items to be included in informed consent documents.
Does your paper address subitem X26-ii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study For those who were willing to participate will be noted on the list. Baseline data and informed consent were acquired following registration.

X26-iii) Safety and security procedures
Safety and security procedures, incl. privacy considerations, and any steps taken to reduce the likelihood or detection of harm (e.g., education and training, availability of a hotline)

RESULTS
13a) For each group, the numbers of participants who were randomly assigned, received intended treatment, and were analysed for the primary outcome NPT: The number of care providers or centers performing the intervention in each group and the number of patients treated by each care provider in each center 13b) For each group, losses and exclusions after randomisation, together with reasons Does your paper address subitem X26-iii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study No safety concern Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 13a? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study A total of 105 subjects completed, including 70 university students recruited from Chang Gung University (18-29 years old) and 35 older adults recruited among volunteers at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (55-73 years old). The participants were assigned at random to the SCT (53 participants) and AEL groups (52 participants), with source populations in each group represented in proportion to the overall population (see Fig. 3), for an overall mean age of 35. Experience and expertise in nutrition, general health education and cooking did not differ signi cantly between the two groups. The baseline information distributions did not reveal signi cant differences among the two groups, thus con rming the random allocation by chance (see Table 1).(from the manuscript) Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 13b? (NOTE: Preferably, this is shown in a CONSORT ow diagram) * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study The participants were assigned at random to the SCT (53 participants) and AEL groups (52 participants), with source populations in each group represented in proportion to the overall population (see Fig. 3), for an overall mean age of 35. 13b-i) Attrition diagram Strongly recommended: An attrition diagram (e.g., proportion of participants still logging in or using the intervention/comparator in each group plotted over time, similar to a survival curve) or other gures or tables demonstrating usage/dose/engagement. Does your paper address subitem 13b-i?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript or cite the gure number if applicable (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study The participants were assigned at random to the SCT (53 participants) and AEL groups (52 participants), with source populations in each group represented in proportion to the overall population (see Fig. 3), for an overall mean age of 35.
(from the manuscript) Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 14a? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study The assessment period was from June 2014 to January 2015. (from our manuscript) 14a-i) Indicate if critical "secular events" fell into the study period Indicate if critical "secular events" fell into the study period, e.g., signi cant changes in Internet resources available or "changes in computer hardware or Internet delivery resources" Does your paper address subitem 14a-i?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study ) For each group, number of participants (denominator) included in each analysis and whether the analysis was by original assigned groups Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 14b? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study No safety issue concerned in this study.
Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 15? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study A total of 105 subjects completed, including 70 university students recruited from Chang Gung University (18-29 years old) and 35 older adults recruited among volunteers at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (55-73 years old). Experience and expertise in nutrition, general health education and cooking did not differ signi cantly between the two groups. The baseline information distributions did not reveal signi cant differences among the two groups, thus con rming the random allocation by chance (see Table 1). (from our manuscript)

15-i) Report demographics associated with digital divide issues
In ehealth trials it is particularly important to report demographics associated with digital divide issues, such as age, education, gender, social-economic status, computer/Internet/ehealth literacy of the participants, if known.
Does your paper address subitem 15-i? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study A total of 105 subjects completed, including 70 university students recruited from Chang Gung University (18-29 years old) and 35 older adults recruited among volunteers at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (55-73 years old). Experience and expertise in nutrition, general health education and cooking did not differ signi cantly between the two groups. The baseline information distributions did not reveal signi cant differences among the two groups, thus con rming the random allocation by chance (see Table 1). (from our manuscript) subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 17a) For each primary and secondary outcome, results for each group, and the estimated effect size and its precision (such as 95% con dence interval) 16-i) Report multiple "denominators" and provide de nitions Report multiple "denominators" and provide de nitions: Report N's (and effect sizes) "across a range of study participation [and use] thresholds" [1], e.g., N exposed, N consented, N used more than x times, N used more than y weeks, N participants "used" the intervention/comparator at speci c pre-de ned time points of interest (in absolute and relative numbers per group). Always clearly de ne "use" of the intervention.
Does your paper address subitem 16-i? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study A total of 105 subjects completed, including 70 university students recruited from Chang Gung University (18-29 years old) and 35 older adults recruited among volunteers at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (55-73 years old). Experience and expertise in nutrition, general health education and cooking did not differ signi cantly between the two groups. The baseline information distributions did not reveal signi cant differences among the two groups, thus con rming the random allocation by chance (see Table 1). (from our manuscript)

16-ii) Primary analysis should be intent-to-treat
Primary analysis should be intent-to-treat, secondary analyses could include comparing only "users", with the appropriate caveats that this is no longer a randomized sample (see 18-i).
Does your paper address subitem 16-ii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study When the difference in duration of task completion (measured in seconds) was used as a continuous variable, we used the independent t-test to compare the two groups based on the intention-to-treat principle. (from our manuscript) Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 17a? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study All statistical tests were two-tailed, and p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically signi cant.
subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential 17b) For binary outcomes, presentation of both absolute and relative effect sizes is recommended 18) Results of any other analyses performed, including subgroup analyses and adjusted analyses, distinguishing pre-speci ed from exploratory 17a-i) Presentation of process outcomes such as metrics of use and intensity of use In addition to primary/secondary (clinical) outcomes, the presentation of process outcomes such as metrics of use and intensity of use (dose, exposure) and their operational de nitions is critical. This does not only refer to metrics of attrition (13-b) (often a binary variable), but also to more continuous exposure metrics such as "average session length". These must be accompanied by a technical description how a metric like a "session" is de ned (e.g., timeout after idle time) [1] (report under item 6a).
Does your paper address subitem 17a-i?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study When the difference in duration of task completion (measured in seconds) was used as a continuous variable, we used the independent t-test to compare the two groups based on the intention-to-treat principle.(from our manuscript) Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 17b? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study We conducted a Chi-square test and t-test for dichotomous and continuous variables for proportion and mean examination of two-group comparisons respectively. When the difference in duration of task completion (measured in seconds) was used as a continuous variable, we used the independent t-test to compare the two groups based on the intention-to-treat principle. All statistical tests were two-tailed, and p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically signi cant.(from our manuscript) subitem not at all important 1 2 3 4 5 essential Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 18? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Table 2 summarizes the response accuracy for all twelve food items. The SCT and AEL groups achieved respective accuracy levels of 97.77% and 98.53%. The most frequently mislabeled food items in SCT were green tea and stir-fried shredded pork and green pepper, green tea was the most frequently mislabeled item in AEL. In SCT, ten of the twelve items were mislabeled 0 or 1 time. In AEL, eleven of the twelve items were mislabeled 0 or 1.
In SCT, 11 of the 13 incorrect answers were that the subject did not select "no toppings" (2), did not select method of preparation (5), and did not select "nondairy creamer" (3) and did not select two food attributes (1). The rest of incorrect answers were to select the wrong method of preparation (2). In AEL, all 9 incorrect answers were due to incorrect selection of food attributes, and none resulted from the user neglecting to select an attribute. (from our manuscript)

18-i) Subgroup analysis of comparing only users
A subgroup analysis of comparing only users is not uncommon in ehealth trials, but if done, it must be stressed that this is a self-selected sample and no longer an unbiased sample from a randomized trial (see 16-iii).
Does your paper address subitem 18-i?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Both SCT and AEL demonstrated high accuracy results (Table 2) for reporting food items in two different meals regardless of age group. Errors in the SCT group occurred because the user did not select the appropriate attribute in a certain category or because the user selected the wrong attribute within the category. These two error types would lead to the incorrect calorie nutrient intake calculation. Senior participants had a relatively higher rate of incorrect responses, possibly due to reduced vision or cognitive ability. Among the wrong answers, eleven occurred because the participant did not select the appreciate food attributes. These errors could possibly be due to interface or training issues, and could be addressed by future improvements to the user interface and training protocol. The AEL group was more likely to make attribute selection errors than the SCT group, possibly because of the large number of lists with similar food descriptions. However, the AEL group did not produce any instance of failing to select the appropriate attribute because the AEL design automatically presents a comprehensive list of all possible food items. (from our manuscript) Restate study questions and summarize the answers suggested by the data, starting with primary outcomes and process outcomes (use).
Does your paper address subitem 22-i? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study This research demonstrates the application of design innovation in implementing a concept in individual-tailored dietary recording and using randomized trials with two target groups. Experimental results show that the two developed applications achieve a high degree of accuracy in describing a wide variety of food items among target users in two distinct age groups.(from our manuscript)

22-ii) Highlight unanswered new questions, suggest future research
Highlight unanswered new questions, suggest future research.
Does your paper address subitem 22-ii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Future research should focus on improving both prototypes, and the development of new applications designed for use in actual dining contexts. Further work also need to consider additional aspects and variables (including food portion sizes and combinations of more than two food items

20-i) Typical limitations in ehealth trials
Typical limitations in ehealth trials: Participants in ehealth trials are rarely blinded. Ehealth trials often look at a multiplicity of outcomes, increasing risk for a Type I error. Discuss biases due to non-use of the intervention/usability issues, biases through informed consent procedures, unexpected events.
Does your paper address subitem 20-i? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study The experiments described here were conducted in laboratory conditions using a predetermined list of food items, and the data collected does not explain the reasons for incorrect selections.(from the manuscript)

21-i) Generalizability to other populations
Generalizability to other populations: In particular, discuss generalizability to a general Internet population, outside of a RCT setting, and general patient population, including applicability of the study results for other organizations Does your paper address subitem 21-i?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Experimental results show that the two developed applications achieve a high degree of accuracy in describing a wide variety of food items among target users in two distinct age groups. (from the manuscript) 21-ii) Discuss if there were elements in the RCT that would be different in a routine application setting Discuss if there were elements in the RCT that would be different in a routine application setting (e.g., prompts/reminders, more human involvement, training sessions or other co-interventions) and what impact the omission of these elements could have on use, adoption, or outcomes if the intervention is applied outside of a RCT setting. Does your paper address subitem 21-ii?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study not applicable Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 23? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study ISRCTN86142301 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN86142301 Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 24? * Cite a Multimedia Appendix, other reference, or copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study ISRCTN86142301 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN86142301 Does your paper address CONSORT subitem 25? * Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study In addition to the usual declaration of interests ( nancial or otherwise), also state the relation of the study team towards the system being evaluated, i.e., state if the authors/evaluators are distinct from or identical with the developers/sponsors of the intervention.
Does your paper address subitem X27-i?
Copy and paste relevant sections from the manuscript (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or brie y explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study Disclosure: The authors declare no con icts.
As a result of using this checklist, did you make changes in your manuscript? * What were the most important changes you made as a result of using this checklist? no major changes How much time did you spend on going through the checklist INCLUDING making changes in your manuscript * three hours As a result of using this checklist, do you think your manuscript has improved? * yes no 其他： STOP -Save this form as PDF before you click submit To generate a record that you lled in this form, we recommend to generate a PDF of this page (on a Mac, simply select "print" and then select "print as PDF") before you submit it.
When you submit your (revised) paper to JMIR, please upload the PDF as supplementary le.
Don't worry if some text in the textboxes is cut off, as we still have the complete information in our database. Thank you!