%0 Journal Article
%@ 2291-5222
%I JMIR Publications
%V 8
%N 4
%P e10733
%T Clinical Applications of Mobile Health Wearable–Based Sleep Monitoring: Systematic Review
%A Guillodo,Elise
%A Lemey,Christophe
%A Simonnet,Mathieu
%A Walter,Michel
%A Baca-García,Enrique
%A Masetti,Vincent
%A Moga,Sorin
%A Larsen,Mark
%A ,
%A Ropars,Juliette
%A Berrouiguet,Sofian
%+ Urci Mental Health Department, Brest Medical University Hospital, Brest, 29200, France, 33 0298223333, elise.guillodo@chu-brest.fr
%K sleep
%K eHealth
%K telemedicine
%K review
%K medicine
%K wearable electronic devices
%D 2020
%7 1.4.2020
%9 Review
%J JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
%G English
%X Background: Sleep disorders are a major public health issue. Nearly 1 in 2 people experience sleep disturbances during their lifetime, with a potential harmful impact on well-being and physical and mental health. Objective: The aim of this study was to better understand the clinical applications of wearable-based sleep monitoring; therefore, we conducted a review of the literature, including feasibility studies and clinical trials on this topic. Methods: We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and the Web of Science through June 2019. We created the list of keywords based on 2 domains: wearables and sleep. The primary selection criterion was the reporting of clinical trials using wearable devices for sleep recording in adults. Results: The initial search identified 645 articles; 19 articles meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis. In all, 4 categories of the selected articles appeared. Of the 19 studies in this review, 58 % (11/19) were comparison studies with the gold standard, 21% (4/19) were feasibility studies, 15% (3/19) were population comparison studies, and 5% (1/19) assessed the impact of sleep disorders in the clinic. The samples were heterogeneous in size, ranging from 1 to 15,839 patients. Our review shows that mobile-health (mHealth) wearable–based sleep monitoring is feasible. However, we identified some major limitations to the reliability of wearable-based monitoring methods compared with polysomnography. Conclusions: This review showed that wearables provide acceptable sleep monitoring but with poor reliability. However, wearable mHealth devices appear to be promising tools for ecological monitoring. 
%M 32234707
%R 10.2196/10733
%U https://mhealth.jmir.org/2020/4/e10733
%U https://doi.org/10.2196/10733
%U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32234707