TY  - JOUR
AU  - van der Haar, Sandra
AU  - Raaijmakers, Ireen
AU  - Verain, Muriel C D
AU  - Meijboom, Saskia
PY  - 2023
DA  - 2023/6/20
TI  - Incorporating Consumers’ Needs in Nutrition Apps to Promote and Maintain Use: Mixed Methods Study
JO  - JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
SP  - e39515
VL  - 11
KW  - mobile health
KW  - mHealth
KW  - mHealth apps
KW  - nutrition apps
KW  - diet apps
KW  - consumer needs
KW  - app
KW  - use
KW  - nutrition
KW  - tool
KW  - consumer
KW  - eating
KW  - habit
KW  - users
KW  - dietary behavior
KW  - reliable
KW  - food
KW  - database
KW  - time
KW  - developers
KW  - mobile phone
AB  - Background: Nutrition apps seem to be promising tools for supporting consumers toward healthier eating habits. There is a wide variety of nutrition apps available; however, users often discontinue app use at an early stage before a permanent change in dietary behavior can be achieved. Objective: The main objective of this study was to identify, from both a user and nonuser perspective, which functionalities should be included in nutrition apps to increase intentions to start and maintain use of these apps. A secondary objective was to gain insight into reasons to quit using nutrition apps at an early stage. Methods: This study used a mixed methods approach and included a qualitative and a quantitative study. The qualitative study (n=40) consisted of a home-use test with 6 commercially available nutrition apps, followed by 6 focus group discussions (FGDs) to investigate user experiences. The quantitative study was a large-scale survey (n=1420), which was performed in a representative sample of the Dutch population to quantify the FGDs’ results. In the survey, several app functionalities were rated on 7-point Likert scales ranging from 1 (very unimportant) to 7 (very important). Results: A total of 3 different phases of app use, subdivided into 10 user-centric app aspects and 46 associated app functionalities, were identified as relevant nutrition app elements in the FGDs. Relevance was confirmed in the survey, as all user-centric aspects and almost all app functionalities were rated as important to include in a nutrition app. In the starting phase, a clear introduction (mean 5.45, SD 1.32), purpose (mean 5.40, SD 1.40), and flexible food tracking options (mean 5.33, SD 1.45) were the most important functionalities. In the use phase, a complete and reliable food product database (mean 5.58, SD 1.41), easy navigation (mean 5.56, SD 1.36), and limited advertisements (mean 5.53, SD 1.51) were the most important functionalities. In the end phase, the possibility of setting realistic goals (mean 5.23, SD 1.44), new personal goals (mean 5.13, SD 1.45), and continuously offering new information (mean 4.88, SD 1.44) were the most important functionalities. No large differences between users, former users, and nonusers were found. The main reason for quitting a nutrition app in the survey was the high time investment (14/38, 37%). This was also identified as a barrier in the FGDs. Conclusions: Nutrition apps should be supportive in all 3 phases of use (start, use, and end) to increase consumers’ intentions to start and maintain the use of these apps and achieve a change in dietary behavior. Each phase includes several key app functionalities that require specific attention from app developers. High time investment is an important reason to quit nutrition app use at an early stage. 
SN  - 2291-5222
UR  - https://mhealth.jmir.org/2023/1/e39515
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2196/39515
UR  - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37338978
DO  - 10.2196/39515
ID  - info:doi/10.2196/39515
ER  -