Published on in Vol 13 (2025)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/75445, first published .
Improvement in Quality of Life After Early Interactive Human Coaching via a Mobile App in Postgastrectomy Patients With Gastric Cancer: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Improvement in Quality of Life After Early Interactive Human Coaching via a Mobile App in Postgastrectomy Patients With Gastric Cancer: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Improvement in Quality of Life After Early Interactive Human Coaching via a Mobile App in Postgastrectomy Patients With Gastric Cancer: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Original Paper

1Center for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea

2Department of Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul Metropolitan Government -Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea

3Department of Clinical Nutrition, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea

Corresponding Author:

Keun Won Ryu, MD, PhD

Center for Gastric Cancer

National Cancer Center

323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu

Goyang, 10408

Republic of Korea

Phone: 82 31 920 1628

Email: docryu@ncc.re.kr


Background: Patients undergoing gastrectomy usually experience postgastrectomy syndrome and face difficulties adapting to a regular diet. Human health coaching via a mobile app has recently been applied to patients with chronic metabolic diseases, with significant improvements being observed in clinical outcomes.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the quality of life and nutritional outcomes of human health coaching via a mobile app with those of conventional face-to-face counseling in postgastrectomy patients with gastric cancer.

Methods: This was a prospective randomized controlled trial, and patients were enrolled between May 2020 and August 2022. The mobile coaching group received health coaching that provides personalized advice based on self-recorded health data via a mobile app from assigned coaches for 3 months after discharge, and the conventional counseling group underwent dietary consultations with a clinical dietitian 1 and 3 months postoperatively. The primary end point for sample size calculation was the eating restriction score on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire gastric cancer module 1 month postoperatively. Secondary end points included changes in other subscales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 and gastric cancer module, as well as nutritional outcomes assessed preoperatively and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

Results: Data from 88.9% (160/180) of enrolled patients were analyzed after excluding dropouts. In the mobile coaching group (n=76), 66% (n=50) of patients who used the mobile app for ≥8 weeks were classified as active users. No significant difference in eating restriction 1 month postoperatively was found between the mobile coaching and conventional counseling groups. However, the mobile coaching group reported less dyspnea during the entire period (P=.01), less eating restriction at 6 months (P=.045), and less negative body image 3 months postoperatively (P=.04) than the conventional counseling group (n=84). Exploratory subgroup analyses based on age, sex, and operation type indicated that younger patients (<60 years), female patients, and those who underwent distal gastrectomy had better quality of life from mobile coaching. In the mobile coaching group, exploratory subgroup analyses based on mobile activity showed that active users had a better global health status than inactive users (P=.005). However, no significant differences in body composition or nutritional parameters were observed between the mobile coaching and conventional counseling groups or between active and inactive users in the mobile coaching group.

Conclusions: Although this trial did not show a significant difference in eating restriction 1 month postoperatively, human coaching via a mobile app was associated with fewer symptoms in some scales compared to conventional counseling in postgastrectomy patients with gastric cancer. The intervention might help patients manage their symptoms and adapt to their diet.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04394585; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04394585

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e75445

doi:10.2196/75445

Keywords



Radical gastrectomy with lymph node dissection is the standard treatment for localized gastric cancer [1]. This procedure offers curative potential and achieves the most desirable outcome. Despite this benefit, patients usually undergo significant lifestyle changes after gastrectomy, with many experiencing postgastrectomy syndrome—a condition characterized by early satiety, abdominal fullness, indigestion, and dumping syndrome. Therefore, eating and postgastrectomy syndrome management are key aspects of postoperative care for these patients.

Patients receive in-hospital education on dietary progression, starting from sips of water to a soft-blend diet, before encountering these challenges. The most effective strategy for preventing postgastrectomy symptoms is to consume small amounts several times daily. Patients are encouraged to practice eating slowly and gradually increasing the amount of food. However, no detailed guidelines exist for transitioning from a soft-blend diet to a regular diet after discharge. Given that each patient has different eating habits, food preferences, digestive abilities, and home environments, applying a uniform guideline is inappropriate. Consequently, dietary adaptation must be tailored to each patient’s situation. Personalized coaching and education may help patients navigate this transition more effectively and reduce the burden of trial and error.

Human health coaching is a patient-centered educational intervention that uses a relational approach to promote sensemaking in health information and support goal setting for health behavior changes [2]. Interpersonal relationships have been shown to play a significant role in achieving specific goals by enhancing self-esteem and self-control [3-5]. Human health coaching has been proven effective in various chronic diseases. However, only a few studies have evaluated its impact in postgastrectomy patients [6].

Therefore, this study aimed to compare the quality of life (QoL) and nutritional outcomes of postgastrectomy patients with gastric cancer undergoing human health coaching via a mobile app with those of patients undergoing conventional face-to-face counseling. Regarding QoL, the primary end point, we hypothesized that the mobile coaching group would experience fewer eating restriction symptoms than the conventional counseling group 1 month postoperatively, which formed the basis for the sample size calculation.


Study Design and Patients

This investigator-initiated prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at the National Cancer Center in the Republic of Korea. Patients who met the following inclusion criteria were recruited for this study: (1) age ≥19 years, (2) diagnosis of clinical stage 1 gastric cancer based on preoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy and computed tomography, (3) being scheduled for distal or total gastrectomy, (4) ability to access a mobile app via a smartphone or residence with a caregiver who can access the mobile app, and (5) cognitive capability to communicate with an assigned coach. The dropout criteria were (1) patients whose planned gastrectomy was not performed, (2) patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy for pathological stage 2 or 3 gastric cancer, (3) patients with a hospital stay of ≥3 weeks due to postoperative complications, and (4) patients who requested to withdraw from the study.

Ethical Considerations

The institutional review board of the National Cancer Center approved the protocol of this randomized controlled trial (NCC2019-0137). The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committees and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before recruitment, and they were informed of their right to withdraw from the study at any time without consequence. No financial compensation was provided for participation. Patients were assigned a study number after registration, and data analyses were performed using an anonymized dataset to ensure participant privacy and confidentiality. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04394585).

Randomization

Enrolled patients were registered at the Clinical Research Coordination Center through a web-based clinical trial management system (myTrial; BethesdaSoft Co, Ltd). Randomization was performed using myTrial, allocating patients to either the mobile coaching or conventional counseling group (parallel) in a 1:1 ratio. The stratification factor was based on the extent of gastrectomy (distal vs total).

Procedures

Patients underwent curative distal or total gastrectomy with D1+ or D2 lymphadenectomy depending on the tumor location and clinical stage [1]. They received standard postoperative management during their hospital stay.

Before discharge, patients assigned to the mobile coaching group were instructed to download Noom Coach (Noom Inc) on their smartphones and were guided on how to use it. Thereafter, they received comprehensive human health coaching via the Noom app for 3 months after discharge. Noom Coach is a commercial mobile app that connects a patient with a coach (dietitian) for advice, instruction, and encouragement. Patients were encouraged by a matched coach to log their daily food intake, exercise, and body weight. The app allowed users to record the type and quantity of food consumed, automatically calculating and displaying the total caloric intake (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Screenshots of the Noom app for the participants.

Exercise was also tracked through manual logging, with patients setting and reporting exercise intensity based on distance and time. The mobile app has a pedometer function that automatically counts the number of steps while it is in use. Informative in-app articles (12 on nutritional or diet-related information, 7 on postgastrectomy syndrome, and 7 on physical activities and mindfulness) were provided 2 or 3 times weekly according to the planned schedule. Coaches monitored patients’ log-in records and whether they had read the articles. They also communicated with patients using an in-app messenger system at least 2 times weekly to encourage them to follow the dietary guidelines, providing individualized feedback based on each patient’s life log. Patients could submit questions related to nutritional and symptomatic issues at any time via the mobile app, and the assigned coach responded as promptly as possible no later than the following morning.

All patients assigned to the conventional counseling group received face-to-face consultations with a hospital-based dietitian 1 and 3 months postoperatively during their routine outpatient visits for regular checkups. During these sessions, patients asked questions regarding their diet, and the dietitian suggested appropriate solutions. Dietitians also provided useful information and brochures when necessary.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was the eating restriction scale of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) gastric cancer module (EORTC QLQ STO22) 1 month postoperatively. In a previous pilot study involving 20 postgastrectomy patients who used Noom Coach, the eating restriction scale showed the greatest change in score postoperatively, with a significant persisting score difference.

Secondary outcomes were changes in QoL over time as assessed using the EORTC QLQ Core 30 (C30) and EORTC QLQ-STO22. The EORTC QLQ Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-item questionnaire that evaluates the general QoL of patients with cancer and comprises 6 functions, 9 symptoms, and global health status. The EORTC QLQ-STO22 is a 22-item, gastric cancer–specific questionnaire comprising 9 symptom scales, each scored from 0 to 100. A higher score on the functional and global health status scales indicates better functional capacity and QoL, whereas a higher score on symptom scales reflects more severe symptoms and poorer QoL [7].

Other secondary outcomes included nutritional parameters such as body weight, BMI, body composition (muscle mass, fat mass, body fat percentage, and basal metabolism), and nutrition-related laboratory values (hemoglobin, serum protein, albumin, and total cholesterol). Body composition was estimated at the outpatient clinic using a bioelectrical impedance analyzer (InBody). The patients completed the questionnaires and assessed their nutritional parameters preoperatively and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

App activity was also analyzed over 3 months as measured via the patients’ frequency of self-reported food intake and body weight, as well as the number of times they read the articles and messaged their coach. If any data were recorded by the patient in a given week, the mobile app was considered “active” for that week. Patients with app activity for ≥8 and <8 weeks were defined as “active users” and “inactive users,” respectively. The frequency of each app activity was assessed, and the primary and secondary outcomes of the active and inactive user groups were compared.

Statistical Analyses

The sample size was calculated based on the results of a pilot study [8]. In the pilot study, the eating restriction scale score on the EORTC QLQ-STO22 showed the most significant change—30 points—1 month postoperatively. We assumed the superiority of the mobile coaching group, expecting a 5-point difference with an SD of 10 in the eating restriction scale 1 month postoperatively [8,9]. On the basis of an effect size of 0.5, a type 1 error of 0.05, statistical power of 80%, and a 1:1 allocation ratio, a total of 126 participants were required for analysis using a 2-tailed t test. Allowing for a 30% dropout rate, we planned to recruit 180 participants (90 per group).

Normal distribution of continuous variables was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Descriptive statistics were presented as means and SDs for continuous variables and as frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. Intergroup differences were tested using a t test or Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and the chi-square or Fisher exact test for categorical variables.

Intergroup comparisons were performed using linear mixed models with repeated measures to analyze the changes in QoL and nutritional parameters over time. Fixed effects included groups, time, and the interaction between group and time. Between-group differences in QoL scores and nutritional values were estimated using the least squares means. Post hoc analyses were performed using the Bonferroni correction when the significance of the interaction between group and time was determined. This process identified significant between-group differences at any given time point. Graphs were constructed to illustrate the mean values over time for the QoL subscale scores and nutritional parameters.

The relationship between the mobile app activities (meal input, exercise input, sending messages, reading articles, and body weight input) and outcomes (QoL and nutritional parameters) was assessed using Pearson correlation analyses. We explored which mobile app activities were most closely associated with improvements in QoL and nutritional outcomes.

Data analyses and visualization were conducted using SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute) and Stata (version 18.0; StataCorp), respectively. Statistical significance was set at P<.05.


Patients

A total of 196 patients were assessed for eligibility between May 2020 and August 2022. Of these 196 patients, 180 (91.8%) were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to either the mobile coaching (n=89, 49.4%) or conventional counseling (n=91, 50.6%) group (Figure 2). Twenty patients were excluded because they were receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (n=17, 85%) or withdrew informed consent (n=3, 15%). Ultimately, 160 patients were included in the final analysis.

Figure 2. CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) diagram.

Patients’ clinicopathological characteristics, including age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, pathological factors, and operation type, did not differ significantly between the conventional counseling and mobile coaching groups (Table 1). The mean ages were 58.7 (SD 9.7) and 60.8 (SD 9.5) years in the conventional counseling and mobile coaching groups, respectively.

Table 1. Patient clinicopathological characteristics.

Conventional counseling group (n=84)Mobile coaching group (n=76)P value
Age (years), mean (SD)58.7 (9.7)60.8 (9.5).18
Sex, n (%).27

Male47 (56)49 (64.5)

Female37 (44)27 (35.5)
BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD)23.7 (4.5)23.9 (3.4).73
Overall comorbidity, n (%).31

Absent53 (63.1)42 (55.3)

Present31 (36.9)34 (44.7)
Detailed comorbidity, n (%)

Hypertension8 (9.5)3 (3.9).16

Hyperlipidemia13 (15.5)13 (17.1).78

Diabetes mellitus8 (9.5)17 (22.4).03

Endocrine disease4 (4.8)1 (1.3).37a

Liver disease4 (4.8)1 (1.3).37a

Pulmonary disease1 (1.2)1 (1.3)>.99a

Urinary disease3 (3.6)3 (3.9)>.99a

Cardiovascular disease3 (3.6)8 (10.5).08

Cerebrovascular disease2 (2.4)1 (1.3)>.99a

Others2 (2.4)1 (1.3)>.99a
Location of tumor, n (%).95

Lower one-third29 (34.5)28 (36.8)

Middle one-third46 (54.8)40 (52.6)

Upper one-third9 (10.7)8 (10.5)
Pathological stage, n (%).48a

IA67 (79.8)54 (71.1)

IB16 (19)21 (27.6)

IIIA1 (1.2)1 (1.3)
Operation type, n (%).95

Distal76 (90.5)69 (90.8)

Total8 (9.5)7 (9.2)
Anastomosis, n (%).95

Billroth I8 (9.5)8 (10.5)

Billroth II68 (81)60 (78.9)

Roux-en-Y8 (9.5)8 (10.5)
Duration of hospital stay (d), median (IQR)7 (7-7)7 (6-7).91b
Complications, n (%)>.99a

Absent81 (96.4)73 (96.1)

Present3 (3.6)3 (3.9)

aAnalyzed using the Fisher exact test.

bAnalyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

App Activity in the Mobile Coaching Group

A total of 66% (50/76) and 34% (26/76) of the patients in the mobile coaching group were classified as active and inactive users, respectively (Table 2). There were no significant differences in mean age, sex, mean BMI, comorbidity, pathological stage, operation type, and duration of hospital stay between the 2 groups. Only the complication rate was higher in the inactive user group than in the active user group (3/26, 12% vs 0%; P=.04).

Table 2. Clinicopathological characteristics of the mobile coaching group.

Inactive users (n=26)Active users (n=50)P value
Age (years), mean (SD)62.5 (10.6)59.9 (8.9).26
Sex, n (%).91

Male17 (65.4)32 (64)

Female9 (34.6)18 (36)
BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD)24.3 (4.4)23.7 (2.9).54
Overall comorbidity, n (%).51

Absent13 (50)29 (58)

Present13 (50)21 (42)
Detailed comorbidity, n (%)

Hypertension2 (7.7)1 (2).27a

Hyperlipidemia4 (15.4)9 (18)>.99a

Diabetes mellitus8 (30.8)9 (18).21

Endocrine disease1 (3.8)0 (0).34a

Liver disease0 (0)1 (2)>.99a

Pulmonary disease0 (0)1 (2)>.99a

Urinary disease3 (11.5)0 (0).04a

Cardiovascular disease2 (7.7)6 (12).71a

Cerebrovascular disease1 (3.8)0 (0).34a

Others1 (3.8)0 (0).34a
Location of tumor, n (%).84

Lower10 (38.5)18 (36)

Middle14 (53.8)26 (52)

Upper2 (7.7)6 (12)
Pathological stage, n (%)>.99a

IA19 (73.1)35 (70)

IB7 (26.9)14 (28)

IIIA0 (0)1 (2)
Operation type, n (%)>.99a

Distal24 (92.3)45 (90)

Total2 (7.7)5 (10)
Anastomosis, n (%).68a

Billroth I4 (15.4)4 (8)

Billroth II20 (76.9)40 (80)

Roux-en-Y2 (7.7)6 (12)
Duration of hospital stay (days), median (IQR)7 (7-7)7 (6-7).67b
Complications, n (%).04a

Absent23 (88.5)50 (100)

Present3 (11.5)0 (0)

aAnalyzed using the Fisher exact test.

bAnalyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

The most frequently performed activities in both groups were meal input, followed by sending messages to coaches, body weight input, exercise input, and reading articles (Figure 3). In the active and inactive user groups, the median number of total activities for 3 months was 487.5 (IQR 234.5-629.3) in the active user group and 16 (IQR 2.8-82.5) in the inactive user group.

Figure 3. Frequency of input in active and inactive users in the mobile coaching group.

Figure 4 shows the number of total activities per week over time. The active user group had ≥40 log records per week during the first month and maintained ≥30 log records until the last week. In contrast, the inactive user group had <20 log records per week in the first week and no records logged after week 7.

Figure 4. Changes in total app activity per week over time in active and inactive users.

Eating Restriction Scale and Changes in QoL

The mean eating restriction scale score 1 month postoperatively was 28.2 (SD 19.3) and 27.9 (SD 20.4) in the conventional counseling and mobile coaching groups, respectively (P=.89), indicating no significant between-group differences.

Figure 5 illustrates the overall changes in postoperative QoL. Compared to the conventional counseling group, the mobile coaching group demonstrated significantly less dyspnea throughout the study period (P=.01), reduced eating restriction at 6 months (P=.045), and less negative body image 3 months postoperatively (P=.04). No significant differences were observed in the remaining functional and symptom scales assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-STO22 (Multimedia Appendices 1-3).

Figure 5. Significant mean changes in postoperative quality of life (QoL).

Furthermore, exploratory subgroup analyses based on age, sex, and operation type revealed that the younger age group (<60 years), female individuals, and patients undergoing distal gastrectomy showed a significant association with better QoL from mobile coaching (Tables S1-S3 in Multimedia Appendix 4). The mobile coaching group had less fatigue (P=.01) and dyspnea (P=.004) and improved body image (P=.02) among younger patients; better emotional function (P=.03) and less general pain (P=.04), dysphagia (P=.04), gastric pain (P=.04), and dry mouth (P=.02) in female individuals; and less fatigue (P=.02) and dyspnea (P=.001) in patients who underwent distal gastrectomy than the conventional counseling group.

Changes in Body Composition and Nutritional Parameters

Patients in both groups experienced a postoperative body weight loss of approximately 5 kg, which continued for 1 year postoperatively (Multimedia Appendix 5). No significant differences were observed in any of the body composition parameters, including skeletal muscle mass, body fat mass, body fat percentage, BMI, or basal metabolic rate, between the 2 groups. Similarly, no significant between-group differences were found in changes in nutritional parameters, including hemoglobin, albumin, protein, and total cholesterol levels (Multimedia Appendix 6).

Exploratory subgroup analyses based on age, sex, and operation type also showed no significant benefit from mobile coaching in any of the subgroups (data not shown).

Outcomes According to App Activity in the Mobile Coaching Group

Exploratory subgroup analyses based on app activity were conducted in the mobile coaching group. The active user group had a significantly better global health status than the inactive user group (P=.005; Figure 4). No significant between-group differences were noted in the other functional and symptom scales (Multimedia Appendices 7-9).

Correlations between app activities and changes in QoL were also assessed to identify which activities contributed most to outcomes (Tables S1 and S2 in Multimedia Appendix 10). Weekly engagement with each activity was correlated with QoL subscales, yielding correlation coefficients (r) ranging from −0.3 to 0.4. The activity of sending messages exhibited a relatively higher positive correlation with global health status (r=0.366), followed by meal input (r=0.292) and reading articles (r=0.2). Exercise and weight inputs showed very weak correlations with global health status.


Principal Findings

This study represents the first prospective randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of mobile health coaching with that of conventional face-to-face counseling in postgastrectomy patients with gastric cancer. Adherence to the program was considerably high, with approximately two-thirds of the patients (50/76, 66%) actively using the mobile health coaching for 3 months; meal logs were the most frequently entered data. While mobile coaching did not affect patients’ body composition or nutritional parameters, patients in the mobile coaching group reported fewer symptoms, including dyspnea, eating restriction, and negative body image, than the conventional counseling group. In the mobile coaching group, active users were associated with a better global health status compared to inactive users.

Developing Mobile Coaching for Postgastrectomy Patients

Nutritional and lifestyle interventions via mobile app platforms have been used to manage various chronic metabolic diseases, such as obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes. Previous studies have reported significant reductions in body weight, BMI, systolic blood pressure, fasting glucose level, and glycated hemoglobin level in participants who used mobile phone apps [10-13]. The use of mobile platforms has expanded to survivors of cancer, particularly those with obesity-associated cancers such as breast, prostate, and colon cancer [14,15]. Postdiagnosis weight gain is common in patients with breast cancer and has been associated with increased risk of recurrence and mortality [16,17]. Therefore, mobile coaching programs have been applied to support patients with breast cancer and have proven to be useful for promoting weight control and improving QoL [18,19].

Postoperative weight maintenance, rather than weight loss, is required in survivors of gastrointestinal cancer. Most patients experience anorexia, dyspepsia, and weight loss after gastric cancer surgery, and malnutrition has been associated with a poor prognosis [20,21]. Therefore, we developed a different mobile coaching app for postgastrectomy patients and trained dieticians on how to respond to the patients’ symptoms and questions [8]. We ensured that the dietitians’ recommendations did not conflict with the surgeons’ advice by asking all surgeons for their opinions on food restriction and any precautions during the dietary adaptation period.

Adherence to the Mobile App

The applicability of the mobile app in postgastrectomy patients with gastric cancer was an important finding of this study. In previous studies, app activity was evaluated using various parameters, including the mean number of log-ins, median number of days visiting the app, and average time spent on the app, which made it difficult to summarize the results [14]. A recent study on patients with breast cancer revealed that the mobile app was opened a mean of 150 times during a 26-week study period [17]. Another study on weight control in individuals with colorectal polyps showed that 44% of the participants were adherent, which is defined as using a device for more than two-thirds of the follow-up period [22]. In other studies, approximately 59% of patients with pancreatic cancer had app activity for ≥9/12 weeks of follow-up, and 69.4% of patients scheduled for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer used the app for >6/8 weeks [23,24]. Our study demonstrated similar app activity, with 66% (50/76) of patients whose mean age was 60.8 (SD 9.5) years using the mobile app coaching program for ≥8/12 weeks. These app activity data provide a solid foundation for planning further studies, and adherence could increase over time as people become more familiar with mobile apps.

Clinical Effectiveness of Mobile Coaching

The mobile coaching program exhibited some favorable results in patient-reported outcomes in this study. Previous studies on survivors of cancer have shown inconsistent patient-reported outcomes and substantial variability attributed to differences in study population, sample size, intervention duration, protocol, and type of comparison group [14]. The aforementioned study on patients with pancreatic cancer found no significant difference in the mean EORTC QLQ-C30 score but reported a significantly better global health status in mobile app users than in nonusers [23]. In our study, scores on the 3 symptom scales of the EORTC QLQ were significantly lower in the mobile app group than in the conventional counseling group. The advice and support provided by the coaches may have fostered a greater sense of comfort and confidence in patients. This, in turn, may have contributed to the reduction in dyspnea and eating restrictions, as well as helping patients have a positive body image.

However, the mobile coaching program did not affect nutritional outcomes in this study. No differences were observed in any of the nutritional parameters between the mobile coaching and conventional counseling groups or between active and inactive users in the mobile coaching group. The previous study on patients with pancreatic cancer also demonstrated no differences in body weight or BMI between the 2 groups [23]. However, the skeletal muscle mass index was maintained in active users but decreased considerably in non–app users after 2 months. This difference may have been related to the fact that active users input exercise and recorded step counts more frequently than inactive users. In our study, patients received mobile coaching immediately after discharge from gastrectomy, a period when most of them experienced eating difficulty and general weakness. Therefore, patients are likely to be primarily concerned with eating challenges and may not have been motivated to engage in exercise. The intensity and duration of coaches’ interventions may also have been insufficient to have a substantial impact on objective nutritional or body composition outcomes. Thus, exercise input was the least frequent app activity, with only 16 exercise activities recorded even among active users over 3 months. In the future, more proactive and timelier patient-tailored approaches are required to help patients maintain their muscle mass and encourage regular exercise.

Limitations

This study had some limitations. First, the hypothesis for calculating sample size was not met, and the actual statistical power appeared to be lower than expected. Although the primary hypothesis (reduction in eating restriction 1 month postoperatively) was not proven, other scales showed significant differences between the 2 groups. These findings will help formulate a more appropriate hypothesis for a future study. Second, this trial was not designed or powered to assess significance within subgroups, and there is a possible selection bias due to covariate imbalance. Therefore, results from subgroup analyses require careful interpretation. Third, the mobile coaching program was available only for 3 months, and its long-term effects were not studied. If we are more proactive in coaching exercises over the long term, this might result in differences in body composition and additional QoL scales. Fourth, although this study had no age limit, some older patients or patients who had difficulty using smartphones were excluded. Moreover, patients were recruited from a single institution in South Korea, limiting the applicability of these study results to other populations worldwide. Finally, as this trial was not a blinded study, an expectation or reporting bias could have been generated.

Conclusions

This study found that 66% (50/76) of patients who underwent gastrectomy (mean age 60.8, SD 9.5 years) demonstrated good adherence to a mobile coaching program designed for dietary adaptation. A 3-month human health coaching delivered via a mobile app was associated with a reduction in symptoms across several scales when compared to conventional face-to-face counseling. This program has the potential to assist patients in managing their symptoms and facilitating adaptation to their regular diet. Furthermore, with modification, it may be applicable to supporting patients with other cancer types who require dietary or lifestyle coaching.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the study coordinators, Chung Sim Kwon and Hyun Ju Cho, for their assistance in participant recruitment and management. The authors did not use any generative artificial intelligence tools in the preparation of this manuscript. All English-language editing was performed by a professional editing service (Editage).

Data Availability

The datasets generated or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Cancer Center, Republic of Korea (grant 1910242), and by a grant from the Korean Cancer Survivors Healthcare Research and Development Project through the National Cancer Center funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (RS-2023-CC139314). The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Authors' Contributions

BWE and KWR conceptualized the study. BWE, HMY, YWK, SYK, JMO, GAW, and KWR collected the data. MH performed the statistical analysis. BWE wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

Multimedia Appendix 1

Mean changes in global health status and functioning scale scores assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 between the mobile coaching and conventional counseling groups.

PNG File , 291 KB

Multimedia Appendix 2

Mean changes in general symptom scale scores assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 between the mobile coaching and conventional counseling groups.

PNG File , 350 KB

Multimedia Appendix 3

Mean changes in gastric cancer–specific symptom scale scores assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire gastric cancer module between the mobile coaching and conventional counseling groups.

PNG File , 310 KB

Multimedia Appendix 4

Subgroup analyses based on clinical factors for significance of differences in postoperative quality of life between the mobile coaching and conventional counselling groups.

DOCX File , 21 KB

Multimedia Appendix 5

Mean changes in body weight and body composition between the mobile coaching and conventional counseling groups.

PNG File , 291 KB

Multimedia Appendix 6

Mean changes in nutritional parameters between the mobile coaching and conventional counseling groups.

PNG File , 212 KB

Multimedia Appendix 7

Mean changes in global health status and functioning scale scores assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 between the active and inactive user groups.

PNG File , 304 KB

Multimedia Appendix 8

Mean changes in general symptom scale scores assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 between the active and inactive user groups.

PNG File , 355 KB

Multimedia Appendix 9

Mean changes in gastric cancer–specific symptom scale scores assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire gastric cancer module between the active and inactive user groups.

PNG File , 320 KB

Multimedia Appendix 10

Correlations between app activity and quality of life score.

DOCX File , 17 KB

Multimedia Appendix 11

CONSORT-EHEALTH (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials of Electronic and Mobile Health Applications and Online Telehealth; version 1.6) checklist.

PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 680 KB

  1. Kim IH, Kang SJ, Choi W, Seo AN, Eom BW, Kang B, et al. Development Working Group for the Korean Practice Guideline for Gastric Cancer 2024 Task Force Team. Korean practice guidelines for gastric cancer 2024: an evidence-based, multidisciplinary approach (update of 2022 guideline). J Gastric Cancer. Jan 2025;25(1):5-114. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  2. van Ryn M, Heaney CA. Developing effective helping relationships in health education practice. Health Educ Behav. Dec 1997;24(6):683-702. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  3. Kivelä K, Elo S, Kyngäs H, Kääriäinen M. The effects of health coaching on adult patients with chronic diseases: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. Nov 2014;97(2):147-157. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  4. Wolever RQ, Dreusicke M, Fikkan J, Hawkins TV, Yeung S, Wakefield J, et al. Integrative health coaching for patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Educ. 2010;36(4):629-639. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  5. Wolever RQ, Simmons LA, Sforzo GA, Dill D, Kaye M, Bechard EM, et al. A systematic review of the literature on health and wellness coaching: defining a key behavioral intervention in healthcare. Glob Adv Health Med. Jul 2013;2(4):38-57. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  6. Park JH, Lee HJ, Kim J, Cho YS, Lee S, Park S, et al. Development and feasibility assessment of mobile application-based digital therapeutics for postoperative supportive care in gastric cancer patients following gastrectomy. J Gastric Cancer. Oct 2024;24(4):420-435. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  7. EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual. EORTC. 2001. URL: https://www.eortc.org/app/uploads/sites/2/2018/02/SCmanual.pdf [accessed 2025-05-29]
  8. Kim HJ, Yoon HM, Ryu KW, Kim YW, Kim SY, Oh JM, et al. An early interactive human coaching via a mobile application to improve quality of life in patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer: design and protocol of a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2022;17(12):e0278370. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  9. Eom BW, Ryu KW, An JY, Suh Y, Cho I, Kim SG, et al. KOrean QUality of life in Stomach cancer patients Study group (KOQUSS). Detection ability of quality of life changes and responsiveness of the KOQUSS-40 and the EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 in patients who underwent gastrectomy: a prospective comparative study. Cancer Res Treat (Forthcoming). Mar 05, 2025. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  10. Islam MM, Poly TN, Walther BA, Jack Li YC. Use of mobile phone app interventions to promote weight loss: meta-analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. Jul 22, 2020;8(7):e17039. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  11. Cho SM, Lee JH, Shim J, Yeom H, Lee SJ, Jeon YW, et al. Effect of smartphone-based lifestyle coaching app on community-dwelling population with moderate metabolic abnormalities: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. Oct 09, 2020;22(10):e17435. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  12. Gazit T, Gutman M, Beatty AL. Assessment of hypertension control among adults participating in a mobile technology blood pressure self-management program. JAMA Netw Open. Oct 01, 2021;4(10):e2127008. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  13. Block G, Azar KM, Romanelli RJ, Block TJ, Hopkins D, Carpenter HA, et al. Diabetes prevention and weight loss with a fully automated behavioral intervention by email, web, and mobile phone: a randomized controlled trial among persons with prediabetes. J Med Internet Res. Oct 23, 2015;17(10):e240. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  14. Wang L, Langlais CS, Kenfield SA, Chan JM, Graff RE, Allen IE, et al. mHealth interventions to promote a healthy diet and physical activity among cancer survivors: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Cancers (Basel). Aug 06, 2022;14(15):3816. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  15. May CN, Ho AS, Yang Q, McCallum M, Iyengar NM, Comander A, et al. Comparing outcomes of a digital commercial weight loss program in adult cancer survivors and matched controls with overweight or obesity: retrospective analysis. Nutrients. Aug 24, 2021;13(9):2908. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  16. Ewertz M, Jensen MB, Gunnarsdóttir KÁ, Højris I, Jakobsen EH, Nielsen D, et al. Effect of obesity on prognosis after early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. Jan 01, 2011;29(1):25-31. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  17. Puklin LS, Li F, Cartmel B, Zhao J, Sanft T, Lisevick A, et al. Post-diagnosis weight trajectories and mortality among women with breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. Dec 02, 2023;9(1):98. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  18. Shen S, Salehi E, White C, Chen Y, Iyengar NM. Evaluation of a mobile behavior change program for weight loss in breast cancer survivors. NPJ Breast Cancer. Jun 29, 2024;10(1):53. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  19. Stubbins R, He T, Yu X, Puppala M, Ezeana CF, Chen S, et al. A behavior-modification, clinical-grade mobile application to improve breast cancer survivors' accountability and health outcomes. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. Dec 2018;2:1-11. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  20. Yu W, Seo BY, Chung HY. Postoperative body-weight loss and survival after curative resection for gastric cancer. Br J Surg. Apr 2002;89(4):467-470. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  21. Dunne RF, Crawford J, Smoyer KE, McRae TD, Rossulek MI, Revkin JH, et al. The mortality burden of cachexia or weight loss in patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer: a systematic literature review. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. Oct 2024;15(5):1628-1640. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  22. Lee KW, Kim HB, Lee SH, Ha HK. Changes in weight and health-related behavior using smartphone applications in patients with colorectal polyps. J Nutr Educ Behav. May 2019;51(5):539-546. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  23. Keum J, Chung MJ, Kim Y, Ko H, Sung MJ, Jo JH, et al. Usefulness of smartphone apps for improving nutritional status of pancreatic cancer patients: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. Aug 31, 2021;9(8):e21088. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  24. Yang K, Oh D, Noh JM, Yoon HG, Sun J, Kim HK, et al. Feasibility of an interactive health coaching mobile app to prevent malnutrition and muscle loss in esophageal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy: prospective pilot study. J Med Internet Res. Aug 27, 2021;23(8):e28695. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]


EORTC QLQ: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire
EORTC QLQ-C30: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30
EORTC QLQ-STO22: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire gastric cancer module
QoL: quality of life


Edited by L Buis; submitted 05.Apr.2025; peer-reviewed by S-H Jeong, YS Park; comments to author 16.Jun.2025; revised version received 28.Nov.2025; accepted 01.Dec.2025; published 18.Dec.2025.

Copyright

©Bang Wool Eom, Mira Han, Hong Man Yoon, Young-Woo Kim, So Young Kim, Jin Myoung Oh, Gyung Ah Wie, Keun Won Ryu. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 18.Dec.2025.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.