Search Results (1 to 10 of 1889 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 581 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 294 JMIR Research Protocols
- 179 JMIR Formative Research
- 172 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 114 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 88 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 64 JMIR Dermatology
- 62 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 50 JMIR Human Factors
- 38 JMIR Mental Health
- 34 JMIR Aging
- 28 JMIR Medical Education
- 24 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 23 JMIR Cancer
- 23 JMIR Serious Games
- 15 JMIR Diabetes
- 15 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 13 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 12 JMIR AI
- 12 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 11 Iproceedings
- 9 JMIR Cardio
- 7 JMIR Infodemiology
- 6 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 4 JMIR Nursing
- 3 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 2 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 2 JMIRx Med
- 1 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 1 JMIR Data
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
When grouped by year of diagnosis, there was a significant improvement in survival over the years (P
Survival was significantly better in patients diagnosed with NKTL as their initial tumor compared to those who had other types of tumors previously.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e70129
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Results revealed that sample type significantly moderated the ESs at posttest (Qb=8.46, P.10). Results of meta-regression analyses were presented in Table 3. β coefficients represent the estimated change in the effect size (Hedges g) associated with a one-unit increase in the predictor variable. P value represents the significance of the z test. Results indicated that none of the variables (ie, mean age, publication year, sex, and quality criteria) were significant moderators (P>.05).
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e69639
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Those with a positive result were significantly more likely to report that a GHP would be helpful (odds ratio [OR] 10.9, 95% CI 2.2-54.0, P=.003) and that they would use a GHP (compared to true negatives: OR 7.2, 95% CI 2.1-25.0, P=.002). Nonetheless, over 75% (25/33) of those with a VUS or uninformative negative results reported a GHP would be helpful. Another factor associated with likely GHP use was history of prior health care portal use (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-4.4, P=.001).
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e56282
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Stigma Attitudes Toward HIV/AIDS From 2011 Through 2023 in Japan: Retrospective Study in Japan
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e69696
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Digital sleep interventions demonstrated a significant medium effect on sleep efficiency (Hedges g=0.62, 95% CI 0.18-1.05; P=.005; I2=60%), with substantial heterogeneity among studies. However, nonsignificant effects were observed for NWAK (P=.27), TST (P=.07), and WASO (P=.18). The detailed results are provided in Figure 4 [42,45,49,50].
Although sleep parameters are crucial outcomes, the certainty of the evidence ranged from “very low” to “low” (Table S1 in Multimedia Appendix 4).
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e69657
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Calibration was considered optimal when the calibration curve was close to the diagonal line, reflected by an observed-to-expected ratio near 1 [14], and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed a P value greater than .05. The precision-recall curve was also used to compare different models in the highly skewed data set, addressing the optimism of the ROC curve [15].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e67253
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Among stable periods, t tests comparing the SMAPE of these 4 models (Figure 3) showed that the average SMAPE at 11.6% for multivariate TFT was significantly lower than the SMAPE for univariate TFT at 13.2% (P=.01), for VARIMA at 16.4% (P=.002), and for ARIMA at 14.8% (P=.003) of the same data. Univariate TFT also outperformed VARIMA (P=.03), while there was no significant difference between VARIMA and ARIMA.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e67156
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section