JMIR mHealth and uHealth

View query in Help articles search

Field

e.g. mhealth

Operator

Field

Criteria

e.g. John Smith or 0000-0001-6479-5330

Exact Match for Criteria

Yes No

Search Results (1 to 10 of 52 Results)

Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS

Sort by:

Health Care Professionals’ Perspectives on Using eHealth Tools in Advanced Home Care: Qualitative Interview Study

Eric Vincent Rivas, Ulf Lesley, Nadia Davoody

JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e60582

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Evaluating the Efficacy of a Serious Game to Deliver Health Education About Invasive Meningococcal Disease: Clustered Randomized Controlled Equivalence Trial

Lauren Bloomfield, Julie Boston, Martin Masek, Lesley Andrew, Donna Barwood, Amanda Devine

JMIR Serious Games 2025;13:e60755

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Video Remote Sign Language Interpreting in Health Communication for Deaf People: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Minerva Rivas Velarde, Laura Catalina Izquierdo Martinez, Jyoti Dalal, Angela Martinez-R, Danna Lesley Cruz Reyes, Jess Cuculick, Alexie Vallejo-Silva, Jonathan Irreño-Sotomonte, Nora Groce

JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e64590

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Adapting a Telehealth Physical Activity and Diet Intervention to a Co-Designed Website for Self-Management After Stroke: Tutorial

Dina Pogrebnoy, Lee Ashton, Brian A Beh, Meredith Burke, Richard Cullen, Jude Czerenkowski, Julie Davey, Amy M Dennett, Kevin English, Erin Godecke, Nicole Harper, Elizabeth Lynch, Lesley MacDonald-Wicks, Amanda Patterson, Emily Ramage, Ben Schelfhaut, Dawn B Simpson, Karly Zacharia, Coralie English

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e58419

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Cost Evaluation of the Ontario Virtual Urgent Care Pilot Program: Population-Based, Matched Cohort Study

Remote Evidence-Based Programs for Health Promotion to Support Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: Mixed Methods Outcome Evaluation

Response choices were created from open-ended responses to an earlier Evidence-Based Leadership Collaborative remote EBP web-based survey in 2020 (L, Steinman, personal communication, December 2020). The 6-month follow-up participant survey included open-ended items about program acceptability and unintended consequences or impacts. Participants who completed the follow-up survey over the telephone were also asked 2 additional qualitative questions about participating in the evaluation.

Lesley Steinman, Kelly Chadwick, Erica Chavez Santos, Sruthi Sravanam, Selisha Snowy Johnson, Elspeth Rensema, Caitlin Mayotte, Paige Denison, Kate Lorig