e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 12 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 5 JMIR Formative Research
- 2 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 1 JMIR Cancer
- 1 JMIR Dermatology
- 1 JMIR Diabetes
- 1 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 1 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Leveraging Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Optimal Dose Selection in Early Phase Cancer Trials
In later phase trials, there is typically enough understanding of the AE profile of the investigational treatment to enable a reliable preselection of items for measurement (eg, using a small subset of PRO-CTCAE items). The same is not true for first in human and other early phase trials.
JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e64611
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A total of 4 PRO measures were selected and programmed in Atom5. The results of the interviews show that most of the people living with the effects of a TBI who took part in the usability study were able to report their symptoms using the Atom5 platform. The number of errors were low (1 critical and 2 noncritical errors) and were due to incompatibility of a device, not knowing what to do after onboarding, or a missing question. Overall, the platform was found to be effective.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e58128
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Digital Health Innovations to Catalyze the Transition to Value-Based Health Care
A patient-reported outcome (PRO) is “an outcome reported directly by patients themselves and not interpreted by an observer.” PROs bring the “patient’s voice” to the care journey and identify conditions or symptoms that matter the most to a patient’s daily life and quality of life [21].
To measure PROs, instruments known as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been developed.
JMIR Med Inform 2025;13:e57385
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
PRO measures (PROMs) are tools used to capture PRO in the form of questionnaires with different constructs and measurement schemes. PROMs have been increasingly used for service evaluation and quality measurement and have been embraced in routine clinical care [4]. The traditional administration method of PROMs in a paper format can be a burden on clinicians and researchers, which makes a remote and automated method of collection potentially beneficial [5].
JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e56370
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In the PRO study (registered on Clinical Trials.gov; NCT03578731), the primary end point investigated the extent to which the self-assessment of the severity of undesirable outcomes between patients with cancer using the Consilium Care app for 90 days and the treating physicians was consistent [17,18]. The occurrence of unplanned (emergency) consultations and hospitalizations among patients with cancer was recorded by the investigators as a secondary end point.
JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e55917
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The Necessity of Interoperability to Uncover the Full Potential of Digital Health Devices
Here, we have focused on the general applicability of semantic terminologies for PRO questionnaires in the 2 comprehensive terminology systems for clinical settings, SNOMED CT and LOINC, from an international perspective.
However, we would also like to point out some other interesting terminologies that allow PRO mapping, such as the NCI Thesaurus or the Med DRA.
JMIR Med Inform 2023;11:e49301
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and PRO measures play a crucial role in this process. PROs refer to any report of the patient’s health status that comes directly from the patient, while patient-reported outcome measures are validated questionnaires that patients complete to self-assess their health status [13]. Patient self-reporting is a critical part of comprehensive pain assessment [14], given pain’s subjective and multidimensional nature.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2023;11:e49677
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Efforts to integrate artificial intelligence into the design of PRO-collecting apps have resulted in improved cancer-related pain control and fewer pain-related hospital admissions [9].
To date, we are aware of no mobile apps focusing on the needs of patients diagnosed with cancer that have used community-partnered participatory research (CPPR) methods in their development.
JMIR Form Res 2022;6(6):e33849
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The study was conducted using the my e PRO app, a patient-reported outcome (PRO) data capture tool that can gather additional data based on individual study requirements (codeveloped by Institut Dr. Schauerte and Bayer and hosted by Institut Dr. Schauerte). The my e PRO app is not a self-care management tool supporting patients in their treatment of T2 DM.
Adult patients who had been prescribed metformin-containing medications were eligible to participate.
JMIR Diabetes 2022;7(2):e31832
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS