e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 2 of 2 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 2 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Assessing the Quality of Mobile Health-Related Apps: Interrater Reliability Study of Two Guides
Tables 3 and 4 show the interrater reliability scores for each mobile app assessed using the MAG and MARS guides. As can be seen, none of the scores complied with the criteria overall or in any category. Nevertheless, the highest interrater reliability scores were for the MAG guide.
A comparison of the interrater reliability between MAG and MARS is shown in Table 5. Additional supplementary information is also provided on the interrater reliability scores for each item (see Multimedia Appendix 1).
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(4):e26471
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The Mobile App Development and Assessment Guide (MAG): Delphi-Based Validity Study
The key finding from this study is that the MAG [28] is a valid tool to help guide the development of health-related mobile apps and assess their quality. The findings also indicate the items that are important to a health-related mobile app (the MAG is provided with this article; see Multimedia Appendix 2).
The data showed that 48 items on the MAG were considered to be of high importance (ie, they were rated with at least a 9 on a 0-10 numerical rating scale by at least 75% of the participants).
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(7):e17760
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS