e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 25 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 16 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 2 JMIR Formative Research
- 2 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 1 JMIR Aging
- 1 JMIR Human Factors
- 1 JMIR Medical Education
- 1 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 1 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Reviewing Mobile Apps for Teaching Human Anatomy: Search and Quality Evaluation Study
In this context, the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) methodology has been used.
JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e64550
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
There were 3 different aspects of usability testing: a paper-based mockup evaluation, followed by an MVP evaluation (>8 weeks later) performed to identify design flaws in the Prehab App using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) [13] and the Trustworthiness Checklist [14,15], and aspects of the Aktionsbündnis für Patientensicherheit (APS; alliance for patient safety) checklist for digital apps [16].
JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e59513
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Nutrition-Related Mobile Apps in the Spanish App Stores: Quality and Content Analysis
The u MARS is an adaptation of the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) developed for end users, while the MARS is used by professionals who require training and expertise in m Health in order to perform the assessment [31]. The u MARS is composed of 4 objective sections, each containing multiple items: engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information. The engagement section (5 items) assesses how entertaining, interesting, customizable, and interactive the app is and whether it fits the target group.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024;12:e52424
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Mobile Apps for Vaccination Services: Content Analysis and Quality Assessment
For independent apps, the exclusion criteria were as follows: apps that were not related to the theme, apps that have not been updated for 1 year, apps that have been downloaded
In this study, MARS was used to complete the evaluation of mobile apps. MARS includes five core components: engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information, and subjective quality. The rating scale was a 5-point scale: inadequate (1), poor (2), acceptable (3), good (4), and excellent (5).
Online J Public Health Inform 2024;16:e50364
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
To assess the quality of the apps more objectively, the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS), a reliable tool for classifying and assessing the quality of m Health apps [39], was used. MARS has been used to assess the quality of different apps, such as mental health [27], nutritional and diet-related [40,41], and chronic disease management [42,43] apps. It consists of 4 objective quality subscales of engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information quality and 1 subjective quality subscale.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024;12:e53805
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Quality Assessment of Smartphone Medication Management Apps in France: Systematic Search
The Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) was used to evaluate the apps. This score was previously validated for the overall quality assessment of an app in the field of m Health [22]. The French version of this score, MARS-F, has also been validated for use with French-language apps [23].
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024;12:e54866
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The quality of the m Health apps was assessed using the validated MARS evaluation tool, which has demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α=.90) [28].
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024;12:e49055
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In detail, the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) was used to evaluate the e Health platform usability. MARS is a self-administered questionnaire with 29 items evaluating the following dimensions: engagement; functionality; aesthetics; quality of the information received; subjective perception of the app quality; impact of the mobile app on knowledge, attitudes, and probability of modifying the target individual behaviors (in this specific case, it refers to behaviors related to pain management).
JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e51021
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
; and MARS technical features (eg, sharing capabilities, password protection, reminder notifications).
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2023;11:e50226
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Technical aspects and quality assessment of the app, based on the Health on the Net Foundation certification of mobile applications (m HONcode) [50] and Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) [51,52], were assessed. The m HONcode evaluates credibility, safety, confidentiality, justifiability, ease of use, financial disclosure, and the use of advertising in apps.
J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e45984
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS