e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 15 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 7 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 4 JMIR Formative Research
- 1 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 1 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 1 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 1 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
The outcome variables for this study were likes and shares, which represent the primary engagement metrics for Tik Tok posts. Likes captured the number of times users expressed approval of a post, and shares indicated how often a post was redistributed by users to others on the platform. To address outliers in these engagement metrics, we applied a log transformation to both likes and shares.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e67515
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Metrics for Evaluating Telemedicine in Randomized Controlled Trials: Scoping Review
To identify the metrics that should be used in future RCTs, it is essential to first understand the actual use of general metrics in past RCTs.
In this study, we conducted a scoping review of articles comparing telemedicine with in-person care in RCTs and summarized the metrics used to understand their usefulness.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e67929
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In response to this need, we have developed enhanced surveillance metrics that capture the dynamic nature of a pandemic and provide insights into imminent growth. Crucially, these metrics indicate where a particular country stands on the epidemiological outbreak curve. In addition, we incorporate dynamic metrics that measure the pace of the pandemic at the province, territory, and national level.
JMIR Public Health Surveill 2024;10:e53218
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
However, these studies have not investigated the impact of deviations from missing data in common CGM metrics on clinical decisions for individual patients [12,22,23]. Furthermore, previous research has determined that at least 14-15 days of CGM data provide a good estimation of CGM metrics compared to monitoring every 3 months or Hb A1c [21,24].
Interact J Med Res 2024;13:e50849
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
We investigated the following two isolated aspects: (1) SC data and algorithm quality using adjusted accuracy metrics and (2) SC symptom comprehension.
The Royal College of General Practitioners in the United Kingdom produced 139 vignettes to evaluate an SC in a benchmarking study conducted by the Self-Care Academic Research Unit of Imperial College London [20].
JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e49907
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In Basket metrics refer to performance indicators that assess the efficiency and effectiveness of managing tasks, web-based messages, or alerts within the EHR system. These metrics assess various aspects of workflow management and communication within the EHR environment.
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e53122
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In addition, 35% (6/17) of the studies proposed metrics that allow for characterizing the standards. These metrics did not entirely represent a specific standard or certification, but rather they supported the evaluation of data control in telemedicine (study 2), the certification of EHRs (study 3), reliability in health-based mobile apps (studies 11, 15, and 17), and data management in medical platforms (study 16).
J Med Internet Res 2022;24(3):e26577
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
The key quantitative outcome measures for the e-forum were metrics data for each of the public social media platforms, as detailed in Textbox 1. The response rates for research-related posts were calculated for the private and invisible Facebook groups.
“Reach is the total number of people who see your content. Impressions are the number of times your content is displayed no matter if it was clicked or not” [19].
JMIR Pediatr Parent 2021;4(4):e18483
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
For articles published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, Eysenbach found relatively strong article-level correlations between these metrics (number of tweets, adjusted by time and journal factors) and future citations and highlighted the importance of using social media–based impact measures to complement traditional citation metrics [10].
J Med Internet Res 2021;23(5):e28859
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS