This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Evaluation and Research Methodology for mHealth (221) Electronic/Mobile Data Capture, Internet-based Survey & Research Methodology (924) Research Instruments, Questionnaires, and Tools (672) mHealth for Data Collection and Research (1098) Quality Improvement (280) Health Care Quality and Health Services Research (296) mHealth for Health Administration (175)

Published on in Vol 5, No 12 (2017): December

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/9061, first published .
The Swedish Web Version of the Quality of Recovery Scale Adapted for Use in a Mobile App: Prospective Psychometric Evaluation Study

The Swedish Web Version of the Quality of Recovery Scale Adapted for Use in a Mobile App: Prospective Psychometric Evaluation Study

The Swedish Web Version of the Quality of Recovery Scale Adapted for Use in a Mobile App: Prospective Psychometric Evaluation Study

Authors of this article:

Ulrica Nilsson1 Author Orcid Image ;   Karuna Dahlberg1 Author Orcid Image ;   Maria Jaensson1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (20) Tweetations (8) Metrics

Journals

  1. Dahlberg K, Jaensson M, Nilsson U. “Let the patient decide” – Person-centered postoperative follow-up contacts, initiated via a phone app after day surgery: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Surgery 2019;61:33 View
  2. Jaensson M, Dahlberg K, Nilsson U. Sex Similarities in Postoperative Recovery and Health Care Contacts Within 14 Days With mHealth Follow-Up: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Perioperative Medicine 2018;1(1):e2 View
  3. Nilsson U, Liander K, Rooyackers O, Eriksson L. Patients’ experiences of early postoperative cognition and its relation to cognitive decline and inflammatory responses: a protocol for a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open 2019;9(12):e032650 View
  4. Hälleberg Nyman M, Nilsson U, Dahlberg K, Jaensson M. Association Between Functional Health Literacy and Postoperative Recovery, Health Care Contacts, and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients Undergoing Day Surgery. JAMA Surgery 2018;153(8):738 View
  5. Myles P. Measuring quality of recovery in perioperative clinical trials. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology 2018;31(4):396 View
  6. Cornejo-Palma D, Urbach D. Virtual postoperative clinic: can we push virtual postoperative care further upstream?. BMJ Quality & Safety 2019;28(1):7 View
  7. Bowyer A, Royse C. The future of recovery – Integrated, digitalised and in real time. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology 2018;32(3-4):295 View
  8. Dahlberg K, Jaensson M, Nilsson U, Eriksson M, Odencrants S. Holding It Together—Patients' Perspectives on Postoperative Recovery When Using an e-Assessed Follow-Up: Qualitative Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2018;6(5):e10387 View
  9. Nilsson U, Dahlberg K, Jaensson M. Low Preoperative Mental and Physical Health is Associated with Poorer Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing Day Surgery: A Secondary Analysis from a Randomized Controlled Study. World Journal of Surgery 2019;43(8):1949 View
  10. Nilsson U, Jaensson M, Dahlberg K, Hugelius K. Postoperative Recovery After General and Regional Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Day Surgery: A Mixed Methods Study. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing 2019;34(3):517 View
  11. Myles P. More than just morbidity and mortality – quality of recovery and long‐term functional recovery after surgery. Anaesthesia 2020;75(S1) View
  12. Patel B, Thind A. Usability of Mobile Health Apps for Postoperative Care: Systematic Review. JMIR Perioperative Medicine 2020;3(2):e19099 View
  13. Nilsson U, Dahlberg K, Jaensson M. Swedish Web Version of the Quality of Recovery Scale Adapted for Patients Undergoing Local Anesthesia and Peripheral Nerve Blockade (SwQoR-LA): Prospective Psychometric Evaluation Study. JMIR Perioperative Medicine 2021;4(1):e23090 View
  14. Ragheb S, Chudyk A, Kent D, Dave M, Hiebert B, Schultz A, Duhamel T, Arora R, Mulvaney S. Use of a mobile health application by adult non-congenital cardiac surgery patients: A feasibility study. PLOS Digital Health 2022;1(6):e0000055 View
  15. Amirpour A, Bergman L, Liander K, Eriksson L, Eckerblad J, Nilsson U. Is the analogue cognitive test from the ISPOCD equivalent to the digital cognitive test Mindmore? A protocol for a randomised cross-over study including qualitative interviews with self-reported healthy seniors. BMJ Open 2022;12(9):e062007 View
  16. Pillai A, Guzzi J, Treggiari M, Yanez N, Hyman J. Comparison of electronic versus phone-based administration of the Quality of Recovery-40 survey after ambulatory surgery. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2023;86:111054 View
  17. Amirpour A, Eckerblad J, Thorell A, Bergman L, Nilsson U. Usability and feasibility of a digital cognitive screening tool measuring older adults’ early postoperative neurocognitive recovery: a protocol for a pilot study. BMJ Open 2023;13(7):e070404 View
  18. Amirpour A, Eckerblad J, Bergman L, Nilsson U. Comparing analog and digital neurocognitive tests with older adults: a study of the ISPOCD battery vs. a digital test battery from Mindmore. BMC Geriatrics 2024;24(1) View
  19. Amirpour A, Bergman L, Markovic G, Liander K, Nilsson U, Eckerblad J. Understanding neurocognitive recovery in older adults after total hip arthroplasty—neurocognitive assessment, blood biomarkers and patient experiences: a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open 2025;15(1):e093872 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Bowyer A, Royse C. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery. View