This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Letters to the Editor (12)

Published on in Vol 5, No 2 (2017): February

Authors’ Reply to: Critique of “Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions” – Does Location of the Device Matter?

Authors’ Reply to: Critique of “Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions” – Does Location of the Device Matter?

Authors’ Reply to: Critique of “Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions” – Does Location of the Device Matter?

Authors of this article:

Gregory M. Dominick1 Author Orcid Image ;   Kyle N. Winfree2 Author Orcid Image ;   Ryan T. Pohlig3 Author Orcid Image ;   Mia A. Papas1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (1) Tweetations (7) Metrics

Journals

  1. Mikkelsen M, Berg-Beckhoff G, Frederiksen P, Horgan G, O’Driscoll R, Palmeira A, Scott S, Stubbs J, Heitmann B, Larsen S, Bergman P. Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X. PLOS ONE 2020;15(6):e0234426 View