Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 27.02.17 in Vol 5, No 2 (2017): February

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Works citing "Critique of: “Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions”"

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/mhealth.6860):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

  1. Dominick GM, Winfree KN, Pohlig RT, Papas MA. Authors’ Reply to: Critique of “Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions” – Does Location of the Device Matter?. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2017;5(2):e13
    CrossRef
  2. Mikkelsen MK, Berg-Beckhoff G, Frederiksen P, Horgan G, O’Driscoll R, Palmeira AL, Scott SE, Stubbs J, Heitmann BL, Larsen SC, Bergman P. Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X. PLOS ONE 2020;15(6):e0234426
    CrossRef