Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 11.08.17 in Vol 5, No 8 (2017): August

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Works citing "How Accurate Is Your Activity Tracker? A Comparative Study of Step Counts in Low-Intensity Physical Activities"

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/mhealth.6321):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

  1. Lynn R, Pfitzer R, Rogers RR, Ballmann CG, Williams TD, Marshall MR. Step-Counting Validity of Wrist-Worn Activity Monitors During Activities With Fixed Upper Extremities. Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour 2020;:1
    CrossRef
  2. Schwab M, Brindl N, Studier-Fischer A, Tu T, Gsenger J, Pilgrim M, Friedrich M, Frey P, Achilles C, Leuck A, Bürgel T, Feisst M, Klose C, Tenckhoff S, Dörr-Harim C, Mihaljevic AL. Postoperative complications and mobilisation following major abdominal surgery with vs. without fitness tracker-based feedback (EXPELLIARMUS): study protocol for a student-led multicentre randomised controlled trial (CHIR-Net SIGMA study group). Trials 2020;21(1)
    CrossRef
  3. Shahrokni A, Alexander K. What will perioperative geriatric assessment for older cancer patients look like in 2025? Advantages and limitations of new technologies in geriatric assessment. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2020;46(3):305
    CrossRef
  4. Attig C, Franke T. Abandonment of personal quantification: A review and empirical study investigating reasons for wearable activity tracking attrition. Computers in Human Behavior 2020;102:223
    CrossRef
  5. Fuller D, Colwell E, Low J, Orychock K, Tobin MA, Simango B, Buote R, Van Heerden D, Luan H, Cullen K, Slade L, Taylor NGA. Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: A Systematic Review (Preprint). JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;
    CrossRef
  6. Nanda S, Hurt RT, Croghan IT, Mundi MS, Gifford SL, Schroeder DR, Fischer KM, Bonnes SL. Improving Physical Activity and Body Composition in a Medical Workplace Using Brief Goal Setting. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes 2019;3(4):495
    CrossRef
  7. Yilmaz T, Foster R, Hao Y. Radio-Frequency and Microwave Techniques for Non-Invasive Measurement of Blood Glucose Levels. Diagnostics 2019;9(1):6
    CrossRef
  8. Shin G, Jarrahi MH, Fei Y, Karami A, Gafinowitz N, Byun A, Lu X. Wearable activity trackers, accuracy, adoption, acceptance and health impact: A systematic literature review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2019;93:103153
    CrossRef
  9. Grym K, Niela-Vilén H, Ekholm E, Hamari L, Azimi I, Rahmani A, Liljeberg P, Löyttyniemi E, Axelin A. Feasibility of smart wristbands for continuous monitoring during pregnancy and one month after birth. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2019;19(1)
    CrossRef
  10. Budig M, Höltke V, Keiner M. Accuracy of optical heart rate measurement and distance measurement of a fitness tracker and their consequential use in sports. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research 2019;49(4):402
    CrossRef
  11. Massouh F, Martin R, Chan B, Ma J, Patel V, Geary MP, Laffey JG, Wijeysundera DN, Abdallah FW. Is Activity Tracker–Measured Ambulation an Accurate and Reliable Determinant of Postoperative Quality of Recovery? A Prospective Cohort Validation Study. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2019;129(4):1144
    CrossRef
  12. Tedesco S, Sica M, Ancillao A, Timmons S, Barton J, O’Flynn B, Najafi B. Accuracy of consumer-level and research-grade activity trackers in ambulatory settings in older adults. PLOS ONE 2019;14(5):e0216891
    CrossRef
  13. Rauwerdink A, Jansen M, de Borgie CAJM, Bemelman WA, Daams F, Schijven MP, Buskens CJ. Improving enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS): ERAS APPtimize study protocol, a randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of a patient-centred mobile application on patient participation in colorectal surgery. BMC Surgery 2019;19(1)
    CrossRef
  14. Kamišalić A, Fister I, Turkanović M, Karakatič S. Sensors and Functionalities of Non-Invasive Wrist-Wearable Devices: A Review. Sensors 2018;18(6):1714
    CrossRef
  15. Henriksen A, Haugen Mikalsen M, Woldaregay AZ, Muzny M, Hartvigsen G, Hopstock LA, Grimsgaard S. Using Fitness Trackers and Smartwatches to Measure Physical Activity in Research: Analysis of Consumer Wrist-Worn Wearables. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(3):e110
    CrossRef
  16. Van der Walt N, Salmon LJ, Gooden B, Lyons MC, O'Sullivan M, Martina K, Pinczewski LA, Roe JP. Feedback From Activity Trackers Improves Daily Step Count After Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of Arthroplasty 2018;33(11):3422
    CrossRef
  17. Shahrokni A, Maggiore RJ, Ghassemzadeh H. New technologies in geriatric oncology care. Journal of Geriatric Oncology 2018;9(6):687
    CrossRef
  18. Modena BD, Bellahsen O, Nikzad N, Chieh A, Parikh N, Dufek DM, Ebner G, Topol EJ, Steinhubl S. Advanced and Accurate Mobile Health Tracking Devices Record New Cardiac Vital Signs. Hypertension 2018;72(2):503
    CrossRef
  19. Poojary J, Arora E, Britto A, Polen Z, Arena R, Babu AS. Validity of Mobile-Based Technology vs Direct Observation in Measuring Number of Steps and Distance Walked in 6 Minutes. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2018;93(12):1873
    CrossRef