Published on in Vol 5, No 8 (2017): August

How Accurate Is Your Activity Tracker? A Comparative Study of Step Counts in Low-Intensity Physical Activities

How Accurate Is Your Activity Tracker? A Comparative Study of Step Counts in Low-Intensity Physical Activities

How Accurate Is Your Activity Tracker? A Comparative Study of Step Counts in Low-Intensity Physical Activities

Journals

  1. Bahadori S, Collard S, Williams J, Swain I. A review of current use of commercial wearable technology and smartphone apps with application in monitoring individuals following total hip replacement surgery. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology 2020;44(6):324 View
  2. Poojary J, Arora E, Britto A, Polen Z, Arena R, Babu A. Validity of Mobile-Based Technology vs Direct Observation in Measuring Number of Steps and Distance Walked in 6 Minutes. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2018;93(12):1873 View
  3. Kamišalić A, Fister I, Turkanović M, Karakatič S. Sensors and Functionalities of Non-Invasive Wrist-Wearable Devices: A Review. Sensors 2018;18(6):1714 View
  4. Rauwerdink A, Jansen M, de Borgie C, Bemelman W, Daams F, Schijven M, Buskens C. Improving enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS): ERAS APPtimize study protocol, a randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of a patient-centred mobile application on patient participation in colorectal surgery. BMC Surgery 2019;19(1) View
  5. Schwab M, Brindl N, Studier-Fischer A, Tu T, Gsenger J, Pilgrim M, Friedrich M, Frey P, Achilles C, Leuck A, Bürgel T, Feisst M, Klose C, Tenckhoff S, Dörr-Harim C, Mihaljevic A. Postoperative complications and mobilisation following major abdominal surgery with vs. without fitness tracker-based feedback (EXPELLIARMUS): study protocol for a student-led multicentre randomised controlled trial (CHIR-Net SIGMA study group). Trials 2020;21(1) View
  6. Modena B, Bellahsen O, Nikzad N, Chieh A, Parikh N, Dufek D, Ebner G, Topol E, Steinhubl S. Advanced and Accurate Mobile Health Tracking Devices Record New Cardiac Vital Signs. Hypertension 2018;72(2):503 View
  7. Tedesco S, Sica M, Ancillao A, Timmons S, Barton J, O’Flynn B, Najafi B. Accuracy of consumer-level and research-grade activity trackers in ambulatory settings in older adults. PLOS ONE 2019;14(5):e0216891 View
  8. Attig C, Franke T. Abandonment of personal quantification: A review and empirical study investigating reasons for wearable activity tracking attrition. Computers in Human Behavior 2020;102:223 View
  9. Massouh F, Martin R, Chan B, Ma J, Patel V, Geary M, Laffey J, Wijeysundera D, Abdallah F. Is Activity Tracker–Measured Ambulation an Accurate and Reliable Determinant of Postoperative Quality of Recovery? A Prospective Cohort Validation Study. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2019;129(4):1144 View
  10. Fuller D, Colwell E, Low J, Orychock K, Tobin M, Simango B, Buote R, Van Heerden D, Luan H, Cullen K, Slade L, Taylor N. Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(9):e18694 View
  11. Budig M, Höltke V, Keiner M. Accuracy of optical heart rate measurement and distance measurement of a fitness tracker and their consequential use in sports. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research 2019;49(4):402 View
  12. Yilmaz T, Foster R, Hao Y. Radio-Frequency and Microwave Techniques for Non-Invasive Measurement of Blood Glucose Levels. Diagnostics 2019;9(1):6 View
  13. Grym K, Niela-Vilén H, Ekholm E, Hamari L, Azimi I, Rahmani A, Liljeberg P, Löyttyniemi E, Axelin A. Feasibility of smart wristbands for continuous monitoring during pregnancy and one month after birth. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2019;19(1) View
  14. Henriksen A, Haugen Mikalsen M, Woldaregay A, Muzny M, Hartvigsen G, Hopstock L, Grimsgaard S. Using Fitness Trackers and Smartwatches to Measure Physical Activity in Research: Analysis of Consumer Wrist-Worn Wearables. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(3):e110 View
  15. Van der Walt N, Salmon L, Gooden B, Lyons M, O'Sullivan M, Martina K, Pinczewski L, Roe J. Feedback From Activity Trackers Improves Daily Step Count After Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of Arthroplasty 2018;33(11):3422 View
  16. Fellger A, Sprint G, Weeks D, Crooks E, Cook D. Wearable Device-Independent Next Day Activity and Next Night Sleep Prediction for Rehabilitation Populations. IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine 2020;8:1 View
  17. Shahrokni A, Maggiore R, Ghassemzadeh H. New technologies in geriatric oncology care. Journal of Geriatric Oncology 2018;9(6):687 View
  18. Shin G, Jarrahi M, Fei Y, Karami A, Gafinowitz N, Byun A, Lu X. Wearable activity trackers, accuracy, adoption, acceptance and health impact: A systematic literature review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2019;93:103153 View
  19. Shahrokni A, Alexander K. What will perioperative geriatric assessment for older cancer patients look like in 2025? Advantages and limitations of new technologies in geriatric assessment. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2020;46(3):305 View
  20. Mohammadi R, Atif M, Centi A, Agboola S, Jethwani K, Kvedar J, Kamarthi S. Neural Network–Based Algorithm for Adjusting Activity Targets to Sustain Exercise Engagement Among People Using Activity Trackers: Retrospective Observation and Algorithm Development Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(9):e18142 View
  21. Lynn R, Pfitzer R, Rogers R, Ballmann C, Williams T, Marshall M. Step-Counting Validity of Wrist-Worn Activity Monitors During Activities With Fixed Upper Extremities. Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour 2020;3(3):197 View
  22. Nanda S, Hurt R, Croghan I, Mundi M, Gifford S, Schroeder D, Fischer K, Bonnes S. Improving Physical Activity and Body Composition in a Medical Workplace Using Brief Goal Setting. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes 2019;3(4):495 View
  23. Alinia P, Fallahzadeh R, Connolly C, Ghasemzadeh H. ParaLabel: Autonomous Parameter Learning for Cross-Domain Step Counting in Wearable Sensors. IEEE Sensors Journal 2020;20(23):13867 View
  24. Johnston W, Judice P, Molina García P, Mühlen J, Lykke Skovgaard E, Stang J, Schumann M, Cheng S, Bloch W, Brønd J, Ekelund U, Grøntved A, Caulfield B, Ortega F, Sardinha L. Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable and smartphone step count: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE network. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2021;55(14):780 View
  25. Merlin M, de Oliveira H, Passos M, Momesso C, dos Santos de Oliveira L, Santana J, Levada-Pires A, Hatanaka E, Massao-Hirabara S, Guaré R, Cury-Boaventura M, Pithon-Curi T, Gorjão R. Relationship between children physical activity, inflammatory mediators and lymphocyte activation: possible impact of social isolation (COVID-19). Sport Sciences for Health 2021;17(2):431 View
  26. Weisberg A, Campelo A, Bhaidani T, Katz L. Physical Activity Tracking Wristbands for Use in Research With Older Adults: An Overview and Recommendations. Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour 2020;3(4):265 View
  27. Jung S, Michaud M, Oudre L, Dorveaux E, Gorintin L, Vayatis N, Ricard D. The Use of Inertial Measurement Units for the Study of Free Living Environment Activity Assessment: A Literature Review. Sensors 2020;20(19):5625 View
  28. Hartung V, Sarshar M, Karle V, Shammas L, Rashid A, Roullier P, Eilers C, Mäurer M, Flachenecker P, Pfeifer K, Tallner A. Validity of Consumer Activity Monitors and an Algorithm Using Smartphone Data for Measuring Steps during Different Activity Types. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020;17(24):9314 View
  29. Carlin T, Vuillerme N. Step and Distance Measurement From a Low-Cost Consumer-Based Hip and Wrist Activity Monitor: Protocol for a Validity and Reliability Assessment. JMIR Research Protocols 2021;10(1):e21262 View
  30. Kelly R, Jones S, Price B, Katz D, McCormick C, Pearce O. Measuring Daily Compliance With Physical Activity Tracking in Ambulatory Surgery Patients: Comparative Analysis of Five Compliance Criteria. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2021;9(1):e22846 View
  31. Chung W, De Vos-Jakobs S, Rivadeneira F, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Waarsing J. The association of BMI and physical activity on acetabular dysplasia in children. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2021;29(1):50 View
  32. Bai Y, Tompkins C, Gell N, Dione D, Zhang T, Byun W, Bergman P. Comprehensive comparison of Apple Watch and Fitbit monitors in a free-living setting. PLOS ONE 2021;16(5):e0251975 View
  33. Nelson B, Flannery J, Flournoy J, Duell N, Prinstein M, Telzer E. Concurrent and prospective associations between fitbit wearable‐derived RDoC arousal and regulatory constructs and adolescent internalizing symptoms. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2022;63(3):282 View
  34. van der Linden M, Nahar van Venrooij L, Verdaasdonk E. Personal Devices to Monitor Physical Activity and Nutritional Intake After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Feasibility Study. JMIR Perioperative Medicine 2022;5(1):e40352 View
  35. Jovanovic M, Mitrov G, Zdravevski E, Lameski P, Colantonio S, Kampel M, Tellioglu H, Florez-Revuelta F. Ambient Assisted Living: Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence Models, Domains, Technology, and Concerns. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(11):e36553 View
  36. Ahmed A, Aziz S, Qidwai U, Farooq F, Shan J, Subramanian M, Chouchane L, EINatour R, Abd-Alrazaq A, Pandas S, Sheikh J. Wearable Artificial Intelligence for Assessing Physical Activity in High School Children. Sustainability 2022;15(1):638 View
  37. Van Laerhoven K, Hoelzemann A, Pahmeier I, Teti A, Gabrys L. Validation of an open-source ambulatory assessment system in support of replicable activity studies. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research 2022;52(2):262 View
  38. Babaei N, Hannani N, Dabanloo N, Bahadori S. A Systematic Review of the Use of Commercial Wearable Activity Trackers for Monitoring Recovery in Individuals Undergoing Total Hip Replacement Surgery. Cyborg and Bionic Systems 2022;2022 View
  39. Marmor M, Grimm B, Hanflik A, Richter P, Sivananthan S, Yarboro S, Braun B. Use of Wearable Technology to Measure Activity in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics 2022;56(7):1112 View
  40. Milne S, Kim S, Murphy A, Larkindale J, Farmer J, Malapira R, Danoudis M, Shaw J, Ramakrishnan T, Rasouli F, Yiu E, Georgiou-Karistianis N, Tai G, Zesiewicz T, Delatycki M, Corben L. The Responsiveness of Gait and Balance Outcomes to Disease Progression in Friedreich Ataxia. The Cerebellum 2021;21(6):963 View
  41. Holubová A, Malá E, Hoidekrová K, Pětioký J, Ďuriš A, Mužík J. The Accuracy of Commercially Available Fitness Trackers in Patients after Stroke. Sensors 2022;22(19):7392 View
  42. Attig C, Franke T. Why Do People Abandon Activity Trackers? The Role of User Diversity in Discontinued Use. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 2023;39(8):1662 View
  43. Park S, Marcotte R, Toth L, Paulus P, Lauricella L, Kim A, Crouter S, Springer C, Staudenmayer J, Bassett D. Free-Living Validation and Harmonization of 10 Wearable Step Count Monitors. Translational Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine 2021;6(4) View
  44. Parikh R, Ferrell W, Wakim J, Williamson J, Khan N, Kopinsky M, Balachandran M, Gabriel P, Zhang Y, Schuchter L, Shulman L, Chen J, Patel M, Manz C. Patient and clinician nudges to improve symptom management in advanced cancer using patient-generated health data: study protocol for the PROStep randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2022;12(5):e054675 View
  45. De Groef A, Asnong A, Blondeel A, Ginis P, Nieuwboer A, De Vrieze T, Devoogdt N, Troosters T, Demeyer H, Geraerts I. Accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers as measuring tool and coaching device in breast and colorectal cancer survivors. Supportive Care in Cancer 2023;31(10) View
  46. Meier M, Holz C. BMAR. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2023;7(2):1 View
  47. Miljanovic Damjanovic V, Obradovic Salcin L, Ostojic D, Ostojic L, Gilic B, Geets Kesic M, Uzicanin E, Sekulic D. Exploring Factors Associated with Physical Activity in the Elderly: A Cross-Sectional Study during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Behavioral Sciences 2024;14(1):62 View