This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Wearable Devices and Sensors (1016) Adoption and Change Management of eHealth Systems (816) mHealth for Wellness, Behavior Change and Prevention (3128) Security and Privacy of mHealth and uHealth (144) Fitness Trackers and Smart Pedometers/Accelerometers (620)

Published on in Vol 6, No 12 (2018): December

Technology Adoption, Motivational Aspects, and Privacy Concerns of Wearables in the German Running Community: Field Study

Technology Adoption, Motivational Aspects, and Privacy Concerns of Wearables in the German Running Community: Field Study

Technology Adoption, Motivational Aspects, and Privacy Concerns of Wearables in the German Running Community: Field Study

Authors of this article:

Martin Wiesner1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Richard Zowalla1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Julian Suleder2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Maximilian Westers1 Author Orcid Image ;   Monika Pobiruchin2, 4 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (31) Tweetations (52) Metrics

Journals

  1. Gilgen-Ammann R, Schweizer T, Wyss T. Accuracy of Distance Recordings in Eight Positioning-Enabled Sport Watches: Instrument Validation Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(6):e17118 View
  2. Adebesin F, Mwalugha R. The Mediating Role of Organizational Reputation and Trust in the Intention to Use Wearable Health Devices: Cross-Country Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(6):e16721 View
  3. Jin D, Halvari H, Maehle N, Olafsen A. Self-tracking behaviour in physical activity: a systematic review of drivers and outcomes of fitness tracking. Behaviour & Information Technology 2022;41(2):242 View
  4. Soliño-Fernandez D, Ding A, Bayro-Kaiser E, Ding E. Willingness to adopt wearable devices with behavioral and economic incentives by health insurance wellness programs: results of a US cross-sectional survey with multiple consumer health vignettes. BMC Public Health 2019;19(1) View
  5. Heidel A, Hagist C. Potential Benefits and Risks Resulting From the Introduction of Health Apps and Wearables Into the German Statutory Health Care System: Scoping Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(9):e16444 View
  6. Strotbaum V, Pobiruchin M, Schreiweis B, Wiesner M, Strahwald B. Your data is gold – Data donation for better healthcare?. it - Information Technology 2019;61(5-6):219 View
  7. Attig C, Franke T. Why Do People Abandon Activity Trackers? The Role of User Diversity in Discontinued Use. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 2023;39(8):1662 View
  8. Ho M, Mantello P, Ghotbi N, Nguyen M, Nguyen H, Vuong Q. Rethinking technological acceptance in the age of emotional AI: Surveying Gen Z (Zoomer) attitudes toward non-conscious data collection. Technology in Society 2022;70:102011 View
  9. Mishra A, Baker-Eveleth L, Gala P, Stachofsky J. Factors influencing actual usage of fitness tracking devices: Empirical evidence from the UTAUT model. Health Marketing Quarterly 2023;40(1):19 View
  10. Mayne R, Bleakley C, Matthews M. Use of monitoring technology and injury incidence among recreational runners: a cross-sectional study. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation 2021;13(1) View
  11. Neumann D, Tiberius V, Biendarra F. Adopting wearables to customize health insurance contributions: a ranking-type Delphi. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2022;22(1) View
  12. Chan Z, Peeters R, Cheing G, Ferber R, Cheung R. Evaluation of COVID-19 Restrictions on Distance Runners' Training Habits Using Wearable Trackers. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living 2022;3 View
  13. Schroeder T, Haug M, Gewald H. Data Privacy Concerns Using mHealth Apps and Smart Speakers: Comparative Interview Study Among Mature Adults. JMIR Formative Research 2022;6(6):e28025 View
  14. Chang V, Doan L, Ariel Xu Q, Hall K, Anna Wang Y, Mustafa Kamal M. Digitalization in omnichannel healthcare supply chain businesses: The role of smart wearable devices. Journal of Business Research 2023;156:113369 View
  15. Pretlove L, Cox A, Sbaffi L, Hopfgartner F. Using a 360° camera as a mobile data collection method towards understanding information types and use in running. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2020;57(1) View
  16. Ogbanufe O, Gerhart N. Exploring smart wearables through the lens of reactance theory: Linking values, social influence, and status quo. Computers in Human Behavior 2022;127:107044 View
  17. Low M, Ramayah T. It Isn't enough to be easy and useful! Combined use of SEM and necessary condition analysis for a better understanding of consumers' acceptance of medical wearable devices. Smart Health 2023;27:100370 View
  18. Lacey A, Whyte E, O’Keeffe S, O’Connor S, Moran K, Mourot L. A qualitative examination of the factors affecting the adoption of injury focused wearable technologies in recreational runners. PLOS ONE 2022;17(7):e0265475 View
  19. Liu C, Wang W, Gao G, Agarwal R. The Virtualization of Experiential Events: Effects on Platform Users. SSRN Electronic Journal 2020 View
  20. Palsa L, Mertala P. Contextualizing Everyday Data Literacies: The Case of Recreational Runners. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 2024;40(19):5845 View
  21. Methlagl M, Michlmayr F, Perillo V. Technological Trust Perceptions in Wearable Fitness Technology: A Person-Centred Approach. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science 2023;8(4):392 View
  22. Liu C, Wang W, Gao G, Agarwal R. The Value of Virtual Engagement: Evidence from a Running Platform. Management Science 2023 View
  23. Methlagl M, Mairhofer S, Michlmayr F. Exploring technology acceptance patterns of users of the mixed-reality sport technology Zwift: antecedents and consequences of technology acceptance. Universal Access in the Information Society 2025;24(1):721 View
  24. Chowdhary K, Crockett Z, Chua J, Soo Hoo J. Exploring the Relationship between Running-Related Technology Use and Running-Related Injuries: A Cross-Sectional Study of Recreational and Elite Long-Distance Runners. Healthcare 2024;12(6):642 View
  25. Tóth K, Takács P, Balatoni I. Users’ Expectations of Smart Devices during Physical Activity—A Literature Review. Applied Sciences 2024;14(8):3518 View
  26. Bourgeus A, Vandercruysse L, Verhulst N. Understanding contextual expectations for sharing wearables' data: Insights from a vignette study. Computers in Human Behavior Reports 2024;15:100443 View
  27. Wettstein R, Sedaghat-Hamedani F, Heinze O, Amr A, Reich C, Betz T, Kayvanpour E, Merzweiler A, Büsch C, Mohr I, Friedmann-Bette B, Frey N, Dugas M, Meder B. A Remote Patient Monitoring System With Feedback Mechanisms Using a Smartwatch: Concept, Implementation, and Evaluation Based on the activeDCM Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2024;12:e58441 View
  28. Alam P, Bolio A, Lin L, Larson H, Ayatollahi H. Stakeholders’ perceptions of personal health data sharing: A scoping review. PLOS Digital Health 2024;3(11):e0000652 View
  29. Walker K, Phillips N, Sheeran L. Exploring the use of digital technology for injury prevention and self-management among recreational runners. Physical Therapy in Sport 2025;71:85 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Choukou M. Digital Health. View

Conference Proceedings

  1. Ebert N, Ackermann K, Heinrich P. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Does Context in Privacy Communication Really Matter? — A Survey on Consumer Concerns and Preferences View