This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Corrigenda and Addenda (44)

Published on in Vol 6, No 3 (2018): March

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/10159, first published .
Acknowledgement Correction: Face-to-Face Versus Mobile Versus Blended Weight Loss Program: Randomized Clinical Trial

Acknowledgement Correction: Face-to-Face Versus Mobile Versus Blended Weight Loss Program: Randomized Clinical Trial

Acknowledgement Correction: Face-to-Face Versus Mobile Versus Blended Weight Loss Program: Randomized Clinical Trial

Authors of this article:

Emalie Hurkmans1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Christophe Matthys3, 4, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   An Bogaerts6 Author Orcid Image ;   Leonie Scheys4, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Karlien Devloo1 Author Orcid Image ;   Jan Seghers1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (2) Tweetations (1) Metrics

Journals

  1. Claes J, Cornelissen V, McDermott C, Moyna N, Pattyn N, Cornelis N, Gallagher A, McCormack C, Newton H, Gillain A, Budts W, Goetschalckx K, Woods C, Moran K, Buys R. PATHway-I: Feasibility, acceptability and clinical effectiveness of a technology enabled cardiac rehabilitation platform. A randomized controlled trial. (Preprint). Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019 View
  2. Metzendorf M, Wieland L, Richter B. Mobile health (m-health) smartphone interventions for adolescents and adults with overweight or obesity. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2024;2024(2) View