This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Fitness Trackers and Smart Pedometers/Accelerometers (610) mHealth for Wellness, Behavior Change and Prevention (3093)

Published on in Vol 6, No 4 (2018): April

Counting Steps in Activities of Daily Living in People With a Chronic Disease Using Nine Commercially Available Fitness Trackers: Cross-Sectional Validity Study

Counting Steps in Activities of Daily Living in People With a Chronic Disease Using Nine Commercially Available Fitness Trackers: Cross-Sectional Validity Study

Counting Steps in Activities of Daily Living in People With a Chronic Disease Using Nine Commercially Available Fitness Trackers: Cross-Sectional Validity Study

Authors of this article:

Darcy Ummels1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Emmylou Beekman1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Kyra Theunissen1 Author Orcid Image ;   Susy Braun4, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Anna J Beurskens1, 3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (30) Tweetations (11) Metrics

Journals

  1. Ummels D, Beekman E, Moser A, Braun S, Beurskens A. Patients’ experiences with commercially available activity trackers embedded in physiotherapy treatment: a qualitative study. Disability and Rehabilitation 2020;42(23):3284 View
  2. Shahrokni A, Maggiore R, Ghassemzadeh H. New technologies in geriatric oncology care. Journal of Geriatric Oncology 2018;9(6):687 View
  3. Kamei T, Kanamori T, Yamamoto Y, Edirippulige S. The use of wearable devices in chronic disease management to enhance adherence and improve telehealth outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2022;28(5):342 View
  4. Golbus J, Nallamothu B. Loss‐Framed Financial Incentives With a Wearable Device for Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Heart Disease: Stepping Up to the Challenge?. Journal of the American Heart Association 2018;7(12) View
  5. Fuller D, Colwell E, Low J, Orychock K, Tobin M, Simango B, Buote R, Van Heerden D, Luan H, Cullen K, Slade L, Taylor N. Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(9):e18694 View
  6. Hermanns M, Haas B, Lisk J. Engaging Older Adults With Parkinson’s Disease in Physical Activity Using Technology: A Feasibility Study. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine 2019;5 View
  7. Gorzelitz J, Farber C, Gangnon R, Cadmus-Bertram L. Accuracy of Wearable Trackers for Measuring Moderate- to Vigorous-Intensity Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour 2020;3(4):346 View
  8. Carlin T, Vuillerme N. Step and Distance Measurement From a Low-Cost Consumer-Based Hip and Wrist Activity Monitor: Protocol for a Validity and Reliability Assessment. JMIR Research Protocols 2021;10(1):e21262 View
  9. Ummels D, Beekman E, Braun S, Beurskens A. Using an Activity Tracker in Healthcare: Experiences of Healthcare Professionals and Patients. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(10):5147 View
  10. Chen W, Karmakar R, Liao Y, Lu Y. Retracted: Development of a Highly Sensitive Wearable Tactile Sensor on Fabric by Using Conductive Inks Based on Electrical Contact Resistance (ECR) Change Mechanism. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 2021;306(8) View
  11. Lunney M, Wiebe N, Kusi-Appiah E, Tonelli A, Lewis R, Ferber R, Tonelli M. Wearable Fitness Trackers to Predict Clinical Deterioration in Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Prospective Cohort Feasibility Study. Kidney Medicine 2021;3(5):768 View
  12. Jourdan T, Debs N, Frindel C. The Contribution of Machine Learning in the Validation of Commercial Wearable Sensors for Gait Monitoring in Patients: A Systematic Review. Sensors 2021;21(14):4808 View
  13. Figueroa C, Luo T, Aguilera A, Lyles C. The need for feminist intersectionality in digital health. The Lancet Digital Health 2021;3(8):e526 View
  14. Holubová A, Malá E, Hoidekrová K, Pětioký J, Ďuriš A, Mužík J. The Accuracy of Commercially Available Fitness Trackers in Patients after Stroke. Sensors 2022;22(19):7392 View
  15. Nelson R, Hasanaj K, Connolly G, Millen L, Muench J, Bidolli N, Preston M, Montoye A. Comparison of Wrist- and Hip-Worn Activity Monitors When Meeting Step Guidelines. Preventing Chronic Disease 2022;19 View
  16. Mattison G, Canfell O, Forrester D, Dobbins C, Smith D, Töyräs J, Sullivan C. The Influence of Wearables on Health Care Outcomes in Chronic Disease: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(7):e36690 View
  17. Tommasini F, Marques-Vidal P, Kayser B, Tasheva P, Ionescu A, Méan M. Steps parameters of elderly patients hospitalised for an acute medical illness in a Swiss University Hospital: an observational pilot study. Swiss Medical Weekly 2022;152(4950):40012 View
  18. Chib A, Lin S, Li C. Wearables for Health Promotion: An Interdisciplinary Review. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022 View
  19. Sands D. Beyond the EHR: How Digital Health Tools Foster Participatory Health and Self-Care for Patients with Diabetes. American Journal of Medicine Open 2023;10:100043 View
  20. Brandenbarg P, Hoekstra F, Barakou I, Seves B, Hettinga F, Hoekstra T, van der Woude L, Dekker R, Krops L. Measurement properties of device-based physical activity instruments in ambulatory adults with physical disabilities and/or chronic diseases: a scoping review. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation 2023;15(1) View
  21. Filippou V, Backhouse M, Redmond A, Wong D. Person-Specific Template Matching Using a Dynamic Time Warping Step-Count Algorithm for Multiple Walking Activities. Sensors 2023;23(22):9061 View
  22. Willingham T, Stowell J, Collier G, Backus D. Leveraging Emerging Technologies to Expand Accessibility and Improve Precision in Rehabilitation and Exercise for People with Disabilities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2024;21(1):79 View
  23. Blondeel A, Devoogdt N, Asnong A, Geraerts I, De Groef A, Heroes A, Van Calster C, Troosters T, Demeyer H, Ginis P, De Vrieze T, Sadek I. Accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers to measure and coach patients with lower limb lymphoedema. PLOS ONE 2024;19(7):e0305768 View
  24. Ummels D, Bijnens W, Aarts J, Meijer K, Beurskens A, Beekman E. The Validation of a Pocket Worn Activity Tracker for Step Count and Physical Behavior in Older Adults during Simulated Activities of Daily Living. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine 2020;6 View
  25. Ummels D, Bols E, Frantzen R, Frantzen T, Robeerts L, Beekman E. Activity Trackers in Physical Therapy for People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the Netherlands: Cross-Sectional Study on Current Use and Implementation Determinants. JMIR Formative Research 2025;9:e59533 View

Conference Proceedings

  1. An Y, Chen S, Locantore N, Allinder M, Mohan D, Bowler R. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM). The Utility of Shapelets for Analyzing Physical Activity of COPD Patients and non-COPD controls View
  2. Vavasour G, Giggins O, Moran O, Doyle J, Kelly D. 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC). Quantifying Steps During a Timed Up and Go Test Using a Wearable Sensor System: A Laboratory-Based Validation Study in Healthy Young and Older Volunteers View
  3. Paymal L, Homewood S. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Good Days, Bad Days: Understanding the Trajectories of Technology Use During Chronic Fatigue Syndrome View
  4. Homewood S, Okholm Just K, Bramm Johansson O. Designing Interactive Systems Conference. The Unanticipated Use of Fitness Tracking Technologies During Post-COVID Syndrome View
  5. Moreno S, Damas M, Rojas I, Amezcua V, Gutierrez-Pastor P, Banos O. UCAmI 2018. Ubiquitous Assessment of the Recovery of Cancer Patients Using Consumer-Level Activity Trackers View