Published on in Vol 6, No 4 (2018): April

Counting Steps in Activities of Daily Living in People With a Chronic Disease Using Nine Commercially Available Fitness Trackers: Cross-Sectional Validity Study

Counting Steps in Activities of Daily Living in People With a Chronic Disease Using Nine Commercially Available Fitness Trackers: Cross-Sectional Validity Study

Counting Steps in Activities of Daily Living in People With a Chronic Disease Using Nine Commercially Available Fitness Trackers: Cross-Sectional Validity Study

Journals

  1. Ummels D, Beekman E, Moser A, Braun S, Beurskens A. Patients’ experiences with commercially available activity trackers embedded in physiotherapy treatment: a qualitative study. Disability and Rehabilitation 2020;42(23):3284 View
  2. Shahrokni A, Maggiore R, Ghassemzadeh H. New technologies in geriatric oncology care. Journal of Geriatric Oncology 2018;9(6):687 View
  3. Kamei T, Kanamori T, Yamamoto Y, Edirippulige S. The use of wearable devices in chronic disease management to enhance adherence and improve telehealth outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2020:1357633X2093757 View
  4. Golbus J, Nallamothu B. Loss‐Framed Financial Incentives With a Wearable Device for Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Heart Disease: Stepping Up to the Challenge?. Journal of the American Heart Association 2018;7(12) View
  5. Fuller D, Colwell E, Low J, Orychock K, Tobin M, Simango B, Buote R, Van Heerden D, Luan H, Cullen K, Slade L, Taylor N. Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(9):e18694 View
  6. Hermanns M, Haas B, Lisk J. Engaging Older Adults With Parkinson’s Disease in Physical Activity Using Technology: A Feasibility Study. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine 2019;5:233372141984267 View
  7. Gorzelitz J, Farber C, Gangnon R, Cadmus-Bertram L. Accuracy of Wearable Trackers for Measuring Moderate- to Vigorous-Intensity Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour 2020;3(4):346 View
  8. Carlin T, Vuillerme N. Step and Distance Measurement From a Low-Cost Consumer-Based Hip and Wrist Activity Monitor: Protocol for a Validity and Reliability Assessment. JMIR Research Protocols 2021;10(1):e21262 View
  9. Ummels D, Beekman E, Braun S, Beurskens A. Using an Activity Tracker in Healthcare: Experiences of Healthcare Professionals and Patients. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(10):5147 View
  10. Chen W, Karmakar R, Liao Y, Lu Y. Development of a Highly Sensitive Wearable Tactile Sensor on Fabric by Using Conductive Inks Based on Electrical Contact Resistance (ECR) Change Mechanism. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 2021:2100130 View
  11. Lunney M, Wiebe N, Kusi-Appiah E, Tonelli A, Lewis R, Ferber R, Tonelli M. Wearable Fitness Trackers to Predict Clinical Deterioration in Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Prospective Cohort Feasibility Study. Kidney Medicine 2021 View
  12. Jourdan T, Debs N, Frindel C. The Contribution of Machine Learning in the Validation of Commercial Wearable Sensors for Gait Monitoring in Patients: A Systematic Review. Sensors 2021;21(14):4808 View
  13. Figueroa C, Luo T, Aguilera A, Lyles C. The need for feminist intersectionality in digital health. The Lancet Digital Health 2021;3(8):e526 View