This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

mHealth for Telemedicine and Homecare (418) Telehealth and Telemonitoring (1713) Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Medicine (235) Pregnancy Information, Education and Lifestyle Interventions (304)

Published on in Vol 7, No 1 (2019): January

Women’s Attitudes Toward Self-Monitoring of Their Pregnancy Using Noninvasive Electronic Devices: Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study

Women’s Attitudes Toward Self-Monitoring of Their Pregnancy Using Noninvasive Electronic Devices: Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study

Women’s Attitudes Toward Self-Monitoring of Their Pregnancy Using Noninvasive Electronic Devices: Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study

Authors of this article:

Katharina Schramm1 Author Orcid Image ;   Niklas Grassl1 Author Orcid Image ;   Juliane Nees1 Author Orcid Image ;   Janine Hoffmann2 Author Orcid Image ;   Holger Stepan2 Author Orcid Image ;   Thomas Bruckner3 Author Orcid Image ;   Markus W Haun4 Author Orcid Image ;   Imad Maatouk4 Author Orcid Image ;   Markus Haist5 Author Orcid Image ;   Timm C Schott6 Author Orcid Image ;   Christof Sohn1 Author Orcid Image ;   Sarah Schott1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (17) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Schramm K, Nees J, Hoffmann J, Bruckner T, Haun M, Maatouk I, Stepan H, Schott S. Emergency consultations in obstetrics: identification of decisive, contributing and associated factors. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2020;302(4):821 View
  2. Niela‐Vilen H, Rahmani A, Liljeberg P, Axelin A. Being ‘A Google Mom’ or securely monitored at home: Perceptions of remote monitoring in maternity care. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2020;76(1):243 View
  3. Bossung V, Kast K. Smart Sensorik in der Schwangerschaft: Narratives Review über die Verlagerung der Schwangerschaftsvorsorge in den Smart Home Bereich. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 2021;164:35 View
  4. Segers S, Mertes H, Pennings G. An ethical exploration of pregnancy related mHealth: does it deliver?. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2021;24(4):677 View
  5. Widiasih R, Hidayat D, Zakaria H, Utama D, Komariah M, Maryam N, Arifin H, Agustina H, Nelson K. Self-Fetal Wellbeing Monitoring and Ante-Natal Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Descriptive Study among Pregnant Women in Indonesia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(21):11672 View
  6. Shouman S, Emara T, Saber H, Allam M. Awareness and attitude of primary healthcare patients towards telehealth in Cairo, Egypt. Current Medical Research and Opinion 2022;38(6):993 View
  7. Li S, Yang Q, Niu S, Liu Y. Effectiveness of Remote Fetal Monitoring on Maternal-Fetal Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2023;11:e41508 View
  8. Fernandes B, Alves B, Matosinhos A, Calácio e Silva B, Dias R, Hasparyk U, Damásio J, Bastos F, Simões e Silva A. The use and role of telemedicine in maternal fetal medicine around the world: an up-to-date. Health and Technology 2023;13(3):365 View
  9. Bruno B, Mercer M, Hizlan S, Peskin J, Ford P, Farrell R, Rose S. Virtual prenatal visits associated with high measures of patient experience and satisfaction among average-risk patients: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2023;23(1) View
  10. Pontones C, Titzmann A, Huebner H, Danzberger N, Ruebner M, Häberle L, Eskofier B, Nissen M, Kehl S, Faschingbauer F, Beckmann M, Fasching P, Schneider M. Feasibility and Acceptance of Self-Guided Mobile Ultrasound among Pregnant Women in Routine Prenatal Care. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2023;12(13):4224 View
  11. Maugeri A, Barchitta M, Agodi A. How Wearable Sensors Can Support the Research on Foetal and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Scoping Review. Journal of Personalized Medicine 2023;13(2):218 View
  12. Aasbø G, Staff A, Blix E, Pay A, Waldum Å, Rivedal S, Solbrække K. Expectations related to home‐based telemonitoring of high‐risk pregnancies: A qualitative study addressing healthcare providers' and users' views in Norway. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2024;103(2):276 View
  13. Nissen M, Perez C, Jaeger K, Bleher H, Flaucher M, Huebner H, Danzberger N, Titzmann A, Pontones C, Fasching P, Beckmann M, Eskofier B, Leutheuser H. Usability and Perception of a Wearable-Integrated Digital Maternity Record App in Germany: User Study. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting 2023;6:e50765 View
  14. Tretter M. Mitigating Health-Related Uncertainties During Pregnancy: The Role of Smart Health Monitoring Technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e48493 View
  15. Tingström J, Öst E, Bergman G, Burström Å. Home monitoring of fetal heart rhythm: Lived experiences of women with anti-SSA/Ro52 autoantibodies and their co-parents. Lupus 2024;33(7):685 View
  16. Dave S, Rathore M, Campbell P, Edgar D, Crabb D, Callaghan T, Jones P. Views and opinions of patients with glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration on vision home-monitoring: a UK-based focus group study. BMJ Open 2024;14(7):e080619 View
  17. Smith G, Jones M, Akel M, Barrera L, Heffernan M, Seed P, Macy M, Fisher S, Mithal L. Parental Perceptions of Early Childhood In-Home Research with Monitoring: A Qualitative Study. The Journal of Pediatrics 2024:114437 View