This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

mHealth for Telemedicine and Homecare (263) Telehealth and Telemonitoring (1224) Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Medicine (134) Pregnancy Information, Education and Lifestyle Interventions (222)

Published on in Vol 7 , No 1 (2019) :January

Women’s Attitudes Toward Self-Monitoring of Their Pregnancy Using Noninvasive Electronic Devices: Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study

Women’s Attitudes Toward Self-Monitoring of Their Pregnancy Using Noninvasive Electronic Devices: Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study

Women’s Attitudes Toward Self-Monitoring of Their Pregnancy Using Noninvasive Electronic Devices: Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study

Authors of this article:

Katharina Schramm 1 Author Orcid Image ;   Niklas Grassl 1 Author Orcid Image ;   Juliane Nees 1 Author Orcid Image ;   Janine Hoffmann 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Holger Stepan 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Thomas Bruckner 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Markus W Haun 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Imad Maatouk 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Markus Haist 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Timm C Schott 6 Author Orcid Image ;   Christof Sohn 1 Author Orcid Image ;   Sarah Schott 1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (9) Tweetations (3) Metrics

Journals

  1. Schramm K, Nees J, Hoffmann J, Bruckner T, Haun M, Maatouk I, Stepan H, Schott S. Emergency consultations in obstetrics: identification of decisive, contributing and associated factors. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2020;302(4):821 View
  2. Niela‐Vilen H, Rahmani A, Liljeberg P, Axelin A. Being ‘A Google Mom’ or securely monitored at home: Perceptions of remote monitoring in maternity care. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2020;76(1):243 View
  3. Bossung V, Kast K. Smart Sensorik in der Schwangerschaft: Narratives Review über die Verlagerung der Schwangerschaftsvorsorge in den Smart Home Bereich. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 2021;164:35 View
  4. Segers S, Mertes H, Pennings G. An ethical exploration of pregnancy related mHealth: does it deliver?. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2021;24(4):677 View
  5. Widiasih R, Hidayat D, Zakaria H, Utama D, Komariah M, Maryam N, Arifin H, Agustina H, Nelson K. Self-Fetal Wellbeing Monitoring and Ante-Natal Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Descriptive Study among Pregnant Women in Indonesia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(21):11672 View
  6. Shouman S, Emara T, Saber H, Allam M. Awareness and attitude of primary healthcare patients towards telehealth in Cairo, Egypt. Current Medical Research and Opinion 2022;38(6):993 View
  7. Li S, Yang Q, Niu S, Liu Y. Effectiveness of Remote Fetal Monitoring on Maternal-Fetal Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2023;11:e41508 View
  8. Fernandes B, Alves B, Matosinhos A, Calácio e Silva B, Dias R, Hasparyk U, Damásio J, Bastos F, Simões e Silva A. The use and role of telemedicine in maternal fetal medicine around the world: an up-to-date. Health and Technology 2023 View
  9. Bruno B, Mercer M, Hizlan S, Peskin J, Ford P, Farrell R, Rose S. Virtual prenatal visits associated with high measures of patient experience and satisfaction among average-risk patients: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2023;23(1) View