This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Fitness Trackers and Smart Pedometers/Accelerometers (561) Innovations and Technology for Physical Activity Education (742) Wearable Devices and Sensors (888) Parent and Child Education on Physical Activity (136)

Published on in Vol 7, No 11 (2019): November

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/13858, first published .
Parental Perspectives of a Wearable Activity Tracker for Children Younger Than 13 Years: Acceptability and Usability Study

Parental Perspectives of a Wearable Activity Tracker for Children Younger Than 13 Years: Acceptability and Usability Study

Parental Perspectives of a Wearable Activity Tracker for Children Younger Than 13 Years: Acceptability and Usability Study

Authors of this article:

Kelly A Mackintosh1 Author Orcid Image ;   Stephanie E Chappel2 Author Orcid Image ;   Jo Salmon2 Author Orcid Image ;   Anna Timperio2 Author Orcid Image ;   Kylie Ball2 Author Orcid Image ;   Helen Brown2 Author Orcid Image ;   Susie Macfarlane3 Author Orcid Image ;   Nicola D Ridgers2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (47) Tweetations (26) Metrics

Journals

  1. Gaffar S, Gearhart A, Chang A. The Next Frontier in Pediatric Cardiology. Pediatric Clinics of North America 2020;67(5):995 View
  2. Garcia J, Leahy N, Brazendale K, Quelly S, Lawrence S. Implementation of a school-based Fitbit program for youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A feasibility study. Disability and Health Journal 2021;14(2):100990 View
  3. Ng K, Kokko S, Tammelin T, Kallio J, Belton S, O'Brien W, Murphy M, Powell C, Woods C. Clusters of Adolescent Physical Activity Tracker Patterns and Their Associations With Physical Activity Behaviors in Finland and Ireland: Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(9):e18509 View
  4. Hsiao P, Chiu C, Lin K, Hu F, Tsai P, Wu C, Pang Y, Lin Y, Kuo M, Chen K, Wu Y, Wu H, Chang Y, Chang Y, Cheng C, Chuu C, Lin F, Chang C, Li Y, Chan J, Chu C. Usability of Wearable Devices With a Novel Cardiac Force Index for Estimating the Dynamic Cardiac Function: Observational Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(7):e15331 View
  5. Lu L, Zhang J, Xie Y, Gao F, Xu S, Wu X, Ye Z. Wearable Health Devices in Health Care: Narrative Systematic Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(11):e18907 View
  6. Drehlich M, Naraine M, Rowe K, Lai S, Salmon J, Brown H, Koorts H, Macfarlane S, Ridgers N. Using the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore Adolescents’ Perspectives on Combining Technologies for Physical Activity Promotion Within an Intervention: Usability Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(3):e15552 View
  7. Collazo C, González Santos J, González Bernal J, Cubo E. Estado sobre la situación del uso y utilidades potenciales de las nuevas tecnologías para medir actividad física. Revisión sistemática de la literatura. Atención Primaria Práctica 2020;2(6):100064 View
  8. Kruizinga M, Heide N, Moll A, Zhuparris A, Yavuz Y, Kam M, Stuurman F, Cohen A, Driessen G, Harezlak J. Towards remote monitoring in pediatric care and clinical trials—Tolerability, repeatability and reference values of candidate digital endpoints derived from physical activity, heart rate and sleep in healthy children. PLOS ONE 2021;16(1):e0244877 View
  9. Webster E, Kracht C, Newton Jr R, Beyl R, Staiano A. Intervention to Improve Preschool Children’s Fundamental Motor Skills: Protocol for a Parent-Focused, Mobile App–Based Comparative Effectiveness Trial. JMIR Research Protocols 2020;9(10):e19943 View
  10. Lupton D. Young People’s Use of Digital Health Technologies in the Global North: Narrative Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(1):e18286 View
  11. Hilty D, Armstrong C, Edwards-Stewart A, Gentry M, Luxton D, Krupinski E. Sensor, Wearable, and Remote Patient Monitoring Competencies for Clinical Care and Training: Scoping Review. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science 2021;6(2):252 View
  12. Restrepo M, Huffenberger A, Hanson C, Draugelis M, Laudanski K. Remote Monitoring of Critically-Ill Post-Surgical Patients: Lessons from a Biosensor Implementation Trial. Healthcare 2021;9(3):343 View
  13. Mauldin K, Gieng J, Saarony D, Hu C. Performing nutrition assessment remotely via telehealth. Nutrition in Clinical Practice 2021;36(4):751 View
  14. Creaser A, Clemes S, Costa S, Hall J, Ridgers N, Barber S, Bingham D. The Acceptability, Feasibility, and Effectiveness of Wearable Activity Trackers for Increasing Physical Activity in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(12):6211 View
  15. Orsolini L, Pompili S, Salvi V, Volpe U. A Systematic Review on TeleMental Health in Youth Mental Health: Focus on Anxiety, Depression and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Medicina 2021;57(8):793 View
  16. Schoeppe S, Waters K, Salmon J, Williams S, Power D, Alley S, Rebar A, Hayman M, Duncan M, Vandelanotte C. Experience and Satisfaction with a Family-Based Physical Activity Intervention Using Activity Trackers and Apps: A Qualitative Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2023;20(4):3327 View
  17. Rhee J, Ma J, Seo J, Cha S. Review of applications and user perceptions of smart home technology for health and environmental monitoring. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering 2022;9(3):857 View
  18. Foster C, Schinasi D, Kan K, Macy M, Wheeler D, Curfman A. Remote Monitoring of Patient- and Family-Generated Health Data in Pediatrics. Pediatrics 2022;149(2) View
  19. Morris A, Telesia L, Wickersham A, Epstein S, Matcham F, Sonuga-Barke E, Downs J. Examining the acceptability of actigraphic devices in children using qualitative and quantitative approaches: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2023;13(3):e070597 View
  20. Butler S, Sculley D, Santos D, Fellas A, Gironès X, Singh-Grewal D, Coda A. Effectiveness of eHealth and mHealth Interventions Supporting Children and Young People Living With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(2):e30457 View
  21. Wang W, Cheng J, Song W, Shen Y. The Effectiveness of Wearable Devices as Physical Activity Interventions for Preventing and Treating Obesity in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2022;10(4):e32435 View
  22. Rast F, Herren S, Labruyère R. Acceptability of wearable inertial sensors, completeness of data, and day-to-day variability of everyday life motor activities in children and adolescents with neuromotor impairments. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences 2022;3 View
  23. Chan A, Chan D, Lee H, Ng C, Yeo A. Reporting adherence, validity and physical activity measures of wearable activity trackers in medical research: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2022;160:104696 View
  24. Rast F, Labruyère R. Sensor-based outcomes to monitor everyday life motor activities of children and adolescents with neuromotor impairments: A survey with health professionals. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences 2022;3 View
  25. Creaser A, Hall J, Costa S, Bingham D, Clemes S. Exploring Families’ Acceptance of Wearable Activity Trackers: A Mixed-Methods Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022;19(6):3472 View
  26. Agesilaou A, Kyza E. Whose data are they? Elementary school students’ conceptualization of data ownership and privacy of personal digital data. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 2022;33:100462 View
  27. Creaser A, Bingham D, Bennett H, Costa S, Clemes S. The development of a family-based wearable intervention using behaviour change and co-design approaches: move and connect. Public Health 2023;217:54 View
  28. Wing D, Godino J, Baker F, Yang R, Chevance G, Thompson W, Reuter C, Bartsch H, Wilbur A, Straub L, Castro N, Higgins M, Colrain I, de Zambotti M, Wade N, Lisdahl K, Squeglia L, Ortigara J, Fuemmeler B, Patrick K, Mason M, Tapert S, Bagot K. Recommendations for Identifying Valid Wear for Consumer-Level Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers and Acceptability of Extended Device Deployment in Children. Sensors 2022;22(23):9189 View
  29. Jenssen B, Thayer J, Nekrasova E, Grundmeier R, Fiks A. Innovation in the pediatric electronic health record to realize a more effective platform. Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care 2022;52(1):101109 View
  30. Visier-Alfonso M, Sánchez-López M, Rodríguez-Martín B, Ruiz-Hermosa A, Bartolomé-Gutiérrez R, Sequí-Domínguez I, Martínez-Vizcaíno V. Parents’ Perceptions of Children’s and Adolescents’ Use of Electronic Devices to Promote Physical Activity: Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2023;11:e44753 View
  31. Jayasinghe S, Hills A. Strategies to Improve Physical Activity and Nutrition Behaviours in Children and Adolescents: A Review. Nutrients 2023;15(15):3370 View
  32. Worlanyo J, Adams C, Adedugbe B, Lokoyi O, Moses M. Knowledge, usability, and impact of wearable fitness devices among community exercisers in Ghana. BMC Digital Health 2023;1(1) View
  33. Romanowicz M, Croarkin K, Elmaghraby R, Skime M, Croarkin P, Vande Voort J, Shekunov J, Athreya A. Machine Learning Identifies Smartwatch-Based Physiological Biomarker for Predicting Disruptive Behavior in Children: A Feasibility Study. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology 2023;33(9):387 View
  34. Sabeti S, Morris N, Shoghli O. Mixed-method usability investigation of ARROWS: augmented reality for roadway work zone safety. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 2024;30(1):292 View
  35. Kopp P, Möhler E, Gröpel P. Physical activity and mental health in school-aged children: a prospective two-wave study during the easing of the COVID-19 restrictions. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health 2024;18(1) View
  36. Di J, Tuttle P, Adamowicz L, Lin W, Zhang H, Psaltos D, Selig J, Bai J, Karahanoglu F, Sheriff P, Seelam V, Williams B, Ghafoor S, Demanuele C, Santamaria M, Cai X. Monitoring Activity and Gait in Children (MAGIC) using digital health technologies. Pediatric Research 2024;96(3):750 View
  37. Knight R, Chalabaev A, Mackintosh K, McNarry M, Hudson J, Lawless M. Moving together: Increasing physical activity in older adults with an intergenerational technology-based intervention. A feasibility study. PLOS ONE 2024;19(3):e0301279 View
  38. Swain T, McNarry M, Mackintosh K. Assessing and Enhancing Movement Quality Using Wearables and Consumer Technologies: Thematic Analysis of Expert Perspectives. JMIR Formative Research 2024;8:e56784 View
  39. Zhang W, Xiong K, Zhu C, Evans R, Zhou L, Podrini C. Promoting child and adolescent health through wearable technology: A systematic review. DIGITAL HEALTH 2024;10 View
  40. Tandon A, Cobb B, Centra J, Izmailova E, Manyakov N, McClenahan S, Patel S, Sezgin E, Vairavan S, Vrijens B, Bakker J. Human Factors, Human-Centered Design, and Usability of Sensor-Based Digital Health Technologies: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e57628 View
  41. Asimakopoulos G, Asimakopoulos S, Spillers F. “It tracks me!”: An analysis of apple watch nudging and user adoption mechanisms. Health Informatics Journal 2024;30(4) View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Ridgers N, Drehlich M. Digital Health. View
  2. Ovchinnikova M, Ostnes D, Garshi A, Jakobsen M, Nyborg-Christensen J, Slavkovik M. Handbook on Intelligent Techniques in the Educational Process. View
  3. Ferreira R, Santos R, Sousa A. Exploring the Convergence of Computer and Medical Science Through Cloud Healthcare. View