Published on in Vol 7, No 2 (2019): February

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/10995, first published .
Evaluation of Electronic and Paper-Pen Data Capturing Tools for Data Quality in a Public Health Survey in a Health and Demographic Surveillance Site, Ethiopia: Randomized Controlled Crossover Health Care Information Technology Evaluation

Evaluation of Electronic and Paper-Pen Data Capturing Tools for Data Quality in a Public Health Survey in a Health and Demographic Surveillance Site, Ethiopia: Randomized Controlled Crossover Health Care Information Technology Evaluation

Evaluation of Electronic and Paper-Pen Data Capturing Tools for Data Quality in a Public Health Survey in a Health and Demographic Surveillance Site, Ethiopia: Randomized Controlled Crossover Health Care Information Technology Evaluation

New in JMIR mhealth: Evaluation of Electronic and Paper-Pen Data Capturing Tools for Data Quality in a Public… https://t.co/iQvXJ40AtT

3:55 PM · Feb 11, 2019

3
2

Evaluation of Electronic and Paper-Pen Data Capturing Tools for Data Quality in a Public Health Survey in a Health… https://t.co/OXBgtAHuCX

4:14 PM · Feb 11, 2019

4
1

RT @AtinkutZeleke: Evaluation of Electronic and Paper-Pen Data Capturing Tools for Data Quality in a Public Health Survey in a Health and D…

5:07 PM · Feb 11, 2019

4
1

RT @jmirpub: New in JMIR mhealth: Evaluation of Electronic and Paper-Pen Data Capturing Tools for Data Quality in a Public #Health Survey i…

6:46 PM · Feb 11, 2019

3
2

Excellent job brother! This study has an important implication for uniform application of #CASI system during surve… https://t.co/WFqaDGRnz3

8:37 PM · Feb 11, 2019

1
0

RT @jmirpub: New in JMIR mhealth: Evaluation of Electronic and Paper-Pen Data Capturing Tools for Data Quality in a Public #Health Survey i…

6:39 AM · Feb 12, 2019

3
2

Evaluation of Electronic and Paper-Pen Data Capturing Tools for Data Quality in a Public Health Survey in a Health… https://t.co/ATBGiym7WY

10:06 AM · Feb 12, 2019

1
0

In a randomized controlled crossover evaluation from @AtinkutZeleke, @OpenDataKit had "significantly better data qu… https://t.co/xqtD5Pj8Ln

10:00 AM · Feb 27, 2019

17
10

RT @OpenDataKit: In a randomized controlled crossover evaluation from @AtinkutZeleke, @OpenDataKit had "significantly better data quality a…

10:12 AM · Feb 27, 2019

17
10

RT @OpenDataKit: In a randomized controlled crossover evaluation from @AtinkutZeleke, @OpenDataKit had "significantly better data quality a…

11:46 AM · Feb 27, 2019

17
10

RT @OpenDataKit: In a randomized controlled crossover evaluation from @AtinkutZeleke, @OpenDataKit had "significantly better data quality a…

12:19 PM · Feb 27, 2019

17
10

RT @OpenDataKit: In a randomized controlled crossover evaluation from @AtinkutZeleke, @OpenDataKit had "significantly better data quality a…

12:48 PM · Feb 27, 2019

17
10

RT @OpenDataKit: In a randomized controlled crossover evaluation from @AtinkutZeleke, @OpenDataKit had "significantly better data quality a…

2:52 PM · Feb 27, 2019

17
10

Evaluation of Electronic and Paper-Pen Data Capturing Tools for Data Quality in a Public Health Survey in a Health… https://t.co/fV3aQ1zVcv

3:48 PM · Mar 20, 2019

1
0