Published on in Vol 8, No 10 (2020): October

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/20482, first published .
Assessing the Food and Drug Administration’s Risk-Based Framework for Software Precertification With Top Health Apps in the United States: Quality Improvement Study

Assessing the Food and Drug Administration’s Risk-Based Framework for Software Precertification With Top Health Apps in the United States: Quality Improvement Study

Assessing the Food and Drug Administration’s Risk-Based Framework for Software Precertification With Top Health Apps in the United States: Quality Improvement Study

Authors of this article:

Noy Alon1 Author Orcid Image ;   Ariel Dora Stern2 Author Orcid Image ;   John Torous1 Author Orcid Image

Journals

  1. Bulaj G, Clark J, Ebrahimi M, Bald E. From Precision Metapharmacology to Patient Empowerment: Delivery of Self-Care Practices for Epilepsy, Pain, Depression and Cancer Using Digital Health Technologies. Frontiers in Pharmacology 2021;12 View
  2. Singh S, Sagar R. Time to Have Effective Regulation of the Mental Health Apps Market: Maximize Gains and Minimize Harms. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine 2022;44(4):399 View
  3. Torous J, Bucci S, Bell I, Kessing L, Faurholt‐Jepsen M, Whelan P, Carvalho A, Keshavan M, Linardon J, Firth J. The growing field of digital psychiatry: current evidence and the future of apps, social media, chatbots, and virtual reality. World Psychiatry 2021;20(3):318 View
  4. Marbouh D, Simsekler M, Salah K, Jayaraman R, Ellahham S. A Blockchain-Based Regulatory Framework for mHealth. Data 2022;7(12):177 View
  5. Torous J, Stern A, Bourgeois F. Regulatory considerations to keep pace with innovation in digital health products. npj Digital Medicine 2022;5(1) View
  6. Camacho E, Cohen A, Torous J. Assessment of Mental Health Services Available Through Smartphone Apps. JAMA Network Open 2022;5(12):e2248784 View
  7. Hassanaly P, Dufour J. Analysis of the Regulatory, Legal, and Medical Conditions for the Prescription of Mobile Health Applications in the United States, The European Union, and France. Medical Devices: Evidence and Research 2021;Volume 14:389 View
  8. Manko B. How digital marketing can use a smart phone app to improve any business’s bottom line. Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases 2022;12(2):244 View
  9. Jacob C, Lindeque J, Klein A, Ivory C, Heuss S, Peter M. Assessing the Quality and Impact of eHealth Tools: Systematic Literature Review and Narrative Synthesis. JMIR Human Factors 2023;10:e45143 View
  10. Zhang X, Lewis S, Chen X, Berry N, Bucci S. Mental health professionals views and the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on implementing digital mental health in China: A nationwide survey study. Internet Interventions 2022;30:100576 View
  11. Seiferth C, Vogel L, Aas B, Brandhorst I, Carlbring P, Conzelmann A, Esfandiari N, Finkbeiner M, Hollmann K, Lautenbacher H, Meinzinger E, Newbold A, Opitz A, Renner T, Sander L, Santangelo P, Schoedel R, Schuller B, Stachl C, Terhorst Y, Torous J, Wac K, Werner-Seidler A, Wolf S, Löchner J. How to e-mental health: a guideline for researchers and practitioners using digital technology in the context of mental health. Nature Mental Health 2023;1(8):542 View
  12. Jacob C, Lindeque J, Müller R, Klein A, Metcalfe T, Connolly S, Koerber F, Maguire R, Denis F, Heuss S, Peter M. A sociotechnical framework to assess patient-facing eHealth tools: results of a modified Delphi process. npj Digital Medicine 2023;6(1) View
  13. Chen S, Lobo B. Regulatory and Implementation Considerations for Artificial Intelligence. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 2024 View