This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Usability of Apps and User Perceptions of mHealth (974) Innovations and Technology in Cancer Care (423)

Published on in Vol 8, No 11 (2020): November

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/20224, first published .
Mobile Health App for Prostate Cancer Patients on Androgen Deprivation Therapy: Qualitative Usability Study

Mobile Health App for Prostate Cancer Patients on Androgen Deprivation Therapy: Qualitative Usability Study

Mobile Health App for Prostate Cancer Patients on Androgen Deprivation Therapy: Qualitative Usability Study

Authors of this article:

Junaid Nabi1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Eugene B Cone1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Anjali Vasavada1 Author Orcid Image ;   Maxine Sun1 Author Orcid Image ;   Kerry L Kilbridge3 Author Orcid Image ;   Adam S Kibel1 Author Orcid Image ;   Donna L Berry4 Author Orcid Image ;   Quoc-Dien Trinh1, 2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (13) Tweetations (4) Metrics

Journals

  1. Alzahrani A, Gay V, Alturki R, AlGhamdi M, Dogra A. Towards Understanding the Usability Attributes of AI-Enabled eHealth Mobile Applications. Journal of Healthcare Engineering 2021;2021:1 View
  2. Yeo S, Oh J, Yu H, Sinn D, Hwang J. The effect of mHealth-based exercise on Insulin Sensitivity for patients with Hepatocellular carcinoma and insulin resistance (mISH): protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2022;23(1) View
  3. Briggs L, Labban M, Alkhatib K, Nguyen D, Cole A, Trinh Q. Digital technologies in cancer care: a review from the clinician's perspective. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research 2022;11(7):533 View
  4. Jacob C, Sezgin E, Sanchez-Vazquez A, Ivory C. Sociotechnical Factors Affecting Patients’ Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: Systematic Literature Review and Narrative Synthesis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2022;10(5):e36284 View
  5. Labban M, Alkassis M, Alkhatib K, Briggs L, Cole A, Kibel A, Trinh Q. Hormone Treatment of Prostate Cancer:. Urologic Clinics of North America 2022;49(2):309 View
  6. Xu Q, Hou X, Xiao T, Zhao W. Factors Affecting Medical Students’ Continuance Intention to Use Mobile Health Applications. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare 2022;Volume 15:471 View
  7. Corbel A, Leroy V, Vesval Q, Rébillard A, Mathieu R. Outils connectés d’APA et cancer de la prostate : revue de la littérature et retour d’expérience. Progrès en Urologie 2022;32(13):880 View
  8. Ogunsanya M, Sifat M, Bamidele O, Ezenwankwo E, Clifton S, Ton C, Knight J, Odedina F, Greer J, Dwyer K, Kendzor D. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions in prostate cancer survivorship: a scoping review. Journal of Cancer Survivorship 2023;17(3):557 View
  9. Wang S, Chiou C, Su C, Wu C, Tsai S, Lin T, Hsu C. Measuring Mobile Phone Application Usability for Anticoagulation from the Perspective of Patients, Caregivers, and Healthcare Professionals. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022;19(16):10136 View
  10. Naranjo-Rojas A, Perula-de Torres L, Cruz-Mosquera F, Molina-Recio G. Usability of a mobile application for the clinical follow-up of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and home oxygen therapy. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2023;175:105089 View
  11. Zhang R, Sun J, Zheng X, Liu M, Wang H, Wang X, Guan J. Prostate cancer patients' experiences and preferences for web‐based physical activity applications: A qualitative meta‐synthesis. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2023;32(19-20):6998 View
  12. Bouarroudj K, Kitouni I, Lechekhab A, Leghelimi Z, Kara I. Quality evaluation of commercially available healthcare applications for prostate cancer management. Multimedia Tools and Applications 2023;82(20):31793 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Hospodková P, Klubarská I, Mašek M, Budil M. 9th European Medical and Biological Engineering Conference. View