This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Quality Evaluation and Descriptive Analysis/Reviews of Multiple Existing Mobile Apps (374) Military Medicine (35) mHealth for Rehabilitation (263)

Published on in Vol 8, No 8 (2020): August

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/19807, first published .
Quality of Psychoeducational Apps for Military Members With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: An Evaluation Utilizing the Mobile Application Rating Scale

Quality of Psychoeducational Apps for Military Members With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: An Evaluation Utilizing the Mobile Application Rating Scale

Quality of Psychoeducational Apps for Military Members With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: An Evaluation Utilizing the Mobile Application Rating Scale

Authors of this article:

Chelsea Jones1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Kaitlin O'Toole1 Author Orcid Image ;   Kevin Jones3 Author Orcid Image ;   Suzette Brémault-Phillips1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (11) Tweetations (4) Metrics

Journals

  1. McDarby M, Llaneza D, George L, Kozlov E. Mobile Applications for Advance Care Planning: A Comprehensive Review of Features, Quality, Content, and Readability. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine® 2021;38(8):983 View
  2. Gimpel H, Manner-Romberg T, Schmied F, Winkler T. Understanding the evaluation of mHealth app features based on a cross-country Kano analysis. Electronic Markets 2021;31(4):765 View
  3. Jones C, Miguel-Cruz A, Brémault-Phillips S. Technology Acceptance and Usability of the BrainFx SCREEN in Canadian Military Members and Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Mixed Methods UTAUT Study. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies 2021;8(2):e26078 View
  4. Woulfe F, Fadahunsi K, Smith S, Chirambo G, Larsson E, Henn P, Mawkin M, O’ Donoghue J. Identification and Evaluation of Methodologies to Assess the Quality of Mobile Health Apps in High-, Low-, and Middle-Income Countries: Rapid Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2021;9(10):e28384 View
  5. Downing M, Hicks A, Braaf S, Myles D, Gabbe B, Ponsford J. “It’s been a long hard road”: challenges faced in the first three years following traumatic brain injury. Disability and Rehabilitation 2022;44(24):7439 View
  6. Jones C, Miguel Cruz A, Smith-MacDonald L, Brown M, Vermetten E, Brémault-Phillips S. Technology Acceptance and Usability of a Virtual Reality Intervention for Military Members and Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Mixed Methods Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Study. JMIR Formative Research 2022;6(4):e33681 View
  7. Voth M, Chisholm S, Sollid H, Jones C, Smith-MacDonald L, Brémault-Phillips S. Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Quality of Resilience-Building Mobile Health Apps for Military, Veteran, and Public Safety Personnel Populations: Scoping Literature Review and App Evaluation. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2022;10(1):e26453 View
  8. Mollica A, Dey A, Cairncross M, Silverberg N, Burke M. Neuropsychiatric Treatment for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Nonpharmacological Approaches. Seminars in Neurology 2022;42(02):168 View
  9. Erhardt D, Bunyi J, Dodge-Rice Z, Neary M, Schueller S. Digitized thought records: a practitioner-focused review of cognitive restructuring apps. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist 2022;15 View
  10. Lu H, Gevirtz R, Yang C, Hauson A. Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized-Controlled Study. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback 2023;48(4):405 View
  11. Ki E, Jang J, Kang D. Evaluating mobile mental health apps using the mobile application rating scale (MARS) in the U.S.. Advances in Mental Health 2024:1 View