This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

mHealth for Wellness, Behavior Change and Prevention (2871) Registered Report (560) Mobile Health (mhealth) (2939) Fitness Trackers and Smart Pedometers/Accelerometers (561) Mobile Apps for Cancer Care and Cancer Prevention and Screening (206) Nutrition, Physical Activity, Healthy Lifestyle for Cancer Patients and Survivors (138) Text-messaging (SMS, WeChat etc)-Based Interventions (650) Cancer Survivorship (258)

Published on in Vol 9, No 2 (2021): February

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/18288, first published .
Acceptability of a Mobile Health Behavior Change Intervention for Cancer Survivors With Obesity or Overweight: Nested Mixed Methods Study Within a Randomized Controlled Trial

Acceptability of a Mobile Health Behavior Change Intervention for Cancer Survivors With Obesity or Overweight: Nested Mixed Methods Study Within a Randomized Controlled Trial

Acceptability of a Mobile Health Behavior Change Intervention for Cancer Survivors With Obesity or Overweight: Nested Mixed Methods Study Within a Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors of this article:

Jenny M Groarke1 Author Orcid Image ;   Janice Richmond2 Author Orcid Image ;   Jenny Mc Sharry3 Author Orcid Image ;   AnnMarie Groarke3 Author Orcid Image ;   Owen M Harney3 Author Orcid Image ;   Mary Grace Kelly2 Author Orcid Image ;   Jane C Walsh3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (14) Tweetations (28) Metrics

Journals

  1. Walsh J, Richmond J, Mc Sharry J, Groarke A, Glynn L, Kelly M, Harney O, Groarke J. Examining the Impact of an mHealth Behavior Change Intervention With a Brief In-Person Component for Cancer Survivors With Overweight or Obesity: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2021;9(7):e24915 View
  2. Springer F, Mehnert-Theuerkauf A. Content features and its implementation in novel app-based psycho-oncological interventions for cancer survivors: a narrative review. Current Opinion in Oncology 2022;34(4):313 View
  3. Martin S, Parlier-Ahmad A, Eglovitch M, Ondersma S, Svikis D, Martin C. Project BETTER: Preliminary Feasibility and Acceptability of a Technology-Delivered Educational Program for Pregnant and Postpartum People with Opioid Use Disorder. Women's Health Reports 2022;3(1):834 View
  4. Bergevi J, Andermo S, Woldamanuel Y, Johansson U, Hagströmer M, Rossen J. User Perceptions of eHealth and mHealth Services Promoting Physical Activity and Healthy Diets: Systematic Review. JMIR Human Factors 2022;9(2):e34278 View
  5. Delestre F, Picon E, Mourah F, Gicquel A, Gounan V, Goujon G, Ouzaid I, Bresset A, Kadouch D, Roussel R, Hansel B. Intérêt d’un programme d’accompagnement en ligne associant conseils nutritionnels et pratiques d’une activité physique en post-cancer : étude pilote ONCOlife. Cahiers de Nutrition et de Diététique 2022;57(4):284 View
  6. Keats M, Yu X, Sweeney Magee M, Forbes C, Grandy S, Sweeney E, Dummer T. Use of Wearable Activity-Monitoring Technologies to Promote Physical Activity in Cancer Survivors: Challenges and Opportunities for Improved Cancer Care. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2023;20(6):4784 View
  7. Agnew H, Kitson S, Crosbie E. Interventions for weight reduction in obesity to improve survival in women with endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2023;2023(3) View
  8. Hægermark E, Kongshaug N, Raj S, Hofsli E, Faxvaag A. Design, Development, and Evaluation of an mHealth App for Reporting of Side Effects During Cytostatic Treatment: Usability Test and Interview Study. JMIR Formative Research 2023;7:e47374 View
  9. Delestre F, Debailly R, Galiby L, Hansel B. Determinants of motivation and adherence to a web application for health behaviour change: A qualitative study with cancer survivors. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 2023;36(5):1701 View
  10. Paynter C, McDonald C, Story D, Francis J. Application of the theoretical framework of acceptability in a surgical setting: Theoretical and methodological insights. British Journal of Health Psychology 2023;28(4):1153 View
  11. Cloß K, Verket M, Müller-Wieland D, Marx N, Schuett K, Jost E, Crysandt M, Beier F, Brümmendorf T, Kobbe G, Brandts J, Jacobsen M. Application of wearables for remote monitoring of oncology patients: A scoping review. DIGITAL HEALTH 2024;10 View
  12. Lazarou I, Krooupa A, Nikolopoulos S, Apostolidis L, Sarris N, Papadopoulos S, Kompatsiaris I. Cancer Patients’ Perspectives and Requirements of Digital Health Technologies: A Scoping Literature Review. Cancers 2024;16(13):2293 View
  13. Haywood D, Baughman F, Dauer E, Haywood J, Rossell S, Hart N. It’s about time: mitigating cancer-related cognitive impairments through findings from computational models of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task. BMC Cancer 2024;24(1) View
  14. Deribe L, Girma E, Lindström N, Gidey A, Teferra S, Addissie A. Parent Education and Counseling (PairEd-C) Intervention to Improve Family-Centered Care: Protocol for a Prospective Acceptability Study Using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. JMIR Research Protocols 2024;13:e54914 View