This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Wearable Devices and Sensors (825) Fitness Trackers and Smart Pedometers/Accelerometers (543) Focus Groups and Qualitative Research for Human Factors Research (781) Usability of Apps and User Perceptions of mHealth (902) mHealth in a Clinical Setting (582) mHealth for Wellness, Behavior Change and Prevention (2754)

Published on in Vol 9, No 8 (2021): August

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/23896, first published .
General Practitioners' Perceptions of the Use of Wearable Electronic Health Monitoring Devices: Qualitative Analysis of Risks and Benefits

General Practitioners' Perceptions of the Use of Wearable Electronic Health Monitoring Devices: Qualitative Analysis of Risks and Benefits

General Practitioners' Perceptions of the Use of Wearable Electronic Health Monitoring Devices: Qualitative Analysis of Risks and Benefits

Authors of this article:

Lucia Volpato1 Author Orcid Image ;   María del Río Carral1 Author Orcid Image ;   Nicolas Senn2 Author Orcid Image ;   Marie Santiago Delefosse1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (13) Tweetations (3) Metrics

Journals

  1. Faheem F, Zafar Z, Razzak A, Kalia J. Implementing Virtual Care in Neurology - Challenges and Pitfalls. Journal of Central Nervous System Disease 2022;14:117957352211097 View
  2. Nazir T, Mushhood Ur Rehman M, Asghar M, Kalia J. Artificial intelligence assisted acute patient journey. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 2022;5 View
  3. Yen H, Huang W. The efficacy of commercial smartwatches with a blood pressure‐monitoring feature: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2022;54(3):324 View
  4. Bajaj R, Meiring R, Beltran F. Co-Design, Development, and Evaluation of a Health Monitoring Tool Using Smartwatch Data: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Future Internet 2023;15(3):111 View
  5. Yao Y, Li Z, He Y, Zhang Y, Guo Z, Lei Y, Zhao Q, Li D, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Liao X. Factors affecting wearable ECG device adoption by general practitioners for atrial fibrillation screening: cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Public Health 2023;11 View
  6. Kim H, Cho B, Jung J, Kim J. Attitudes and perspectives of nurses and physicians in South Korea towards the clinical use of person-generated health data. DIGITAL HEALTH 2023;9 View
  7. Nourse R, Dingler T, Kelly J, Kwasnicka D, Maddison R. The Role of a Smart Health Ecosystem in Transforming the Management of Chronic Health Conditions. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e44265 View
  8. Alsulami S, Konstantinidis S, Wharrad H. Use of wearables among Multiple Sclerosis patients and healthcare Professionals: A scoping review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2024;184:105376 View
  9. Weik L, Fehring L, Mortsiefer A, Meister S. Understanding inherent influencing factors to digital health adoption in general practices through a mixed-methods analysis. npj Digital Medicine 2024;7(1) View
  10. Hou S, Wang X, Zhao Z, Ma Y, Liu J, Zhang Z, Ma J. A Scale for Measuring Electronic Patient Engagement Behaviors: Development and Validation. Patient Preference and Adherence 2024;Volume 18:917 View
  11. Le Roux E, Ursino M, Milovanovic I, Picq P, Haignere J, Rault G, Pougheon Bertrand D, Alberti C. Homebased connected devices combined with statistical process control for the early detection of respiratory exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis: a pilot study (Preprint). JMIR Formative Research 2023 View
  12. Sharifi-Heris Z, Fortier M, Rahmani A, Sharifiheris H, Bender M, Axelin A. Feasibility of continuous smart health monitoring in pregnant population: A mixed-method approach. PLOS Digital Health 2024;3(6):e0000517 View
  13. Cui J. Measuring the adoption of internet and communication technologies among practitioners in routine disability services: a stepped inclusive approach. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2024:1 View