This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Wearables and MHealth Reviews (281) Usability of Apps and User Perceptions of mHealth (1070) Mobile Health (mhealth) (3120) Human Factors and Usability Case Studies (879) Digital Health Reviews (1476) Quality Evaluation and Descriptive Analysis/Reviews of Multiple Existing Mobile Apps (391) Evaluation and Research Methodology for mHealth (219)

Published on in Vol 12 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/52179, first published .
Attributes, Methods, and Frameworks Used to Evaluate Wearables and Their Companion mHealth Apps: Scoping Review

Attributes, Methods, and Frameworks Used to Evaluate Wearables and Their Companion mHealth Apps: Scoping Review

Attributes, Methods, and Frameworks Used to Evaluate Wearables and Their Companion mHealth Apps: Scoping Review

Authors of this article:

Preetha Moorthy1 Author Orcid Image ;   Lina Weinert2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Christina Schüttler4 Author Orcid Image ;   Laura Svensson2 Author Orcid Image ;   Brita Sedlmayr5 Author Orcid Image ;   Julia Müller2 Author Orcid Image ;   Till Nagel6 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (3) Tweetations (8) Metrics

Journals

  1. Schnitzbauer A, Detemble C, Faqar-Uz-Zaman S, Dreilich J, Mohr L, Sliwinski S, Zmuc D, Siller M, Fleckenstein J. Usability Testing of a Digitized Interventional Prehabilitation Tool for Health Care Professionals and Patients Before Major Surgeries: Formative and Summative Evaluation. JMIR Formative Research 2024;8:e59513 View
  2. Gubin D, Weinert D, Stefani O, Otsuka K, Borisenkov M, Cornelissen G. Wearables in Chronomedicine and Interpretation of Circadian Health. Diagnostics 2025;15(3):327 View
  3. Chandrasekaran R, Sadiq T M, Moustakas E. Usage Trends and Data Sharing Practices of Healthcare Wearable Devices Among US Adults: Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2025;27:e63879 View