This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Wearables and MHealth Reviews (277) Wearable Devices and Sensors (905) Sleep Monitoring, Sleep Quality, Sleep Disorders (192) Fitness Trackers and Smart Pedometers/Accelerometers (571) Wearable Devices and Sensors (905) mHealth for Data Collection and Research (982) mHealth for Data Collection and Research (982) Fitness Trackers and Smart Pedometers/Accelerometers (571) Sleep Monitoring, Sleep Quality, Sleep Disorders (192)

Published on in Vol 12 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/52192, first published .
Accuracy of Fitbit Charge 4, Garmin Vivosmart 4, and WHOOP Versus Polysomnography: Systematic Review

Accuracy of Fitbit Charge 4, Garmin Vivosmart 4, and WHOOP Versus Polysomnography: Systematic Review

Accuracy of Fitbit Charge 4, Garmin Vivosmart 4, and WHOOP Versus Polysomnography: Systematic Review

Authors of this article:

An-Marie Schyvens1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Nina Catharina Van Oost3 Author Orcid Image ;   Jean-Marie Aerts3 Author Orcid Image ;   Federica Masci3 Author Orcid Image ;   Brent Peters4 Author Orcid Image ;   An Neven4 Author Orcid Image ;   Hélène Dirix4 Author Orcid Image ;   Geert Wets4 Author Orcid Image ;   Veerle Ross4, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Johan Verbraecken1, 2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (6) Tweetations (18) Metrics
All Time | Last Month | Last Six Months | Last Year
There are currently no tweets available for this article within the specified range.