Accessibility settings

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Fitness Trackers and Smart Pedometers/Accelerometers (777) mHealth for Data Collection and Research (1670) Wearable Devices and Sensors (1519) Innovations and Technology for Physical Activity Education (1047) Pulmonology, COPD (229) Validity, Reliability, and Bias (129)

Published on in Vol 12 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/56027, first published .
Person in a green hoodie checks a smartwatch, outdoors.

Validity of a Consumer-Based Wearable to Measure Clinical Parameters in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Healthy Controls: Observational Study

Validity of a Consumer-Based Wearable to Measure Clinical Parameters in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Healthy Controls: Observational Study

Authors of this article:

Fien Hermans1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Eva Arents1 Author Orcid Image ;   Astrid Blondeel2 Author Orcid Image ;   Wim Janssens3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Nina Cardinaels5 Author Orcid Image ;   Patrick Calders1 Author Orcid Image ;   Thierry Troosters2 Author Orcid Image ;   Eric Derom5 Author Orcid Image ;   Heleen Demeyer1, 2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (11) Tweetations (8) Metrics

Journals

  1. de Leon M, Camic C, Herring M, Hill C. Validity and Inter-Device Reliability of the OTBeat BurnTM Monitor to Estimate Heart Rate During Exercise. Sports 2025;13(2):49 View
  2. Jiménez-Gómez M, Sayas Catalan J. Smart steps forward: the role of wearables in long-term rehabilitation after lung transplantation. Thorax 2025;80(10):681 View
  3. Bourgeois N. Commentary on Farid et al.. Physiotherapy Canada 2025;77(3):370 View
  4. Zhang C, Zhang C, Jin Z, Yu K, Wei S, Zhang M, Jin Z, Liao J, Wang G. The value of cough sound monitoring via an audio-enabled smartwatch for OSA screening in COPD patients: a cross-sectional exploratory study. Frontiers in Medicine 2025;12 View
  5. Flores-Castañeda R, Olaya-Cotera S, Iparraguirre-Villanueva O. Exploring wearable technologies for health monitoring: a systematic review of applications, advantages and disadvantages. Neural Computing and Applications 2025;37(33):27957 View
  6. Nasr A, Behbehani K, Wang J, Pierson C, Jarrett R, Greer T, Zafereo J. Agreement between Fitbit Versa 4 and a reference standard on time-domain nocturnal heart rate variability: A pilot study. DIGITAL HEALTH 2025;11 View
  7. Park J. Pulmonary Rehabilitation Using Digital Technology: Innovative Approaches. Annals of CardioPulmonary Rehabilitation 2025;5(2):38 View
  8. Sicbaldi M, Bartoli L, Albites-Sanabria J, D’Ascanio I, Silvani A, Chiari L, Camon A, Palmerini L. Is my smartwatch a valid witness? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Forensic Science International 2026;384:112901 View
  9. Kolukisa Birgec B, Toprak B, Mullen A. Assessment of Respiratory Rate and Simulated Apnea Utilizing the PneumoWave Biosensor: In Vitro and In Vivo Validation. Biosensors 2026;16(5):256 View
  10. Momand Z, Mongkolnam P, Pal D, Yamsaengsung S. Combining Subjective Perceptions and Objective Behavioral Metrics With the Elderly Digital Twin System: Quantitative Usability Study. JMIR Aging 2026;9:e91873 View
  11. Schipper R, Oumar Djibrillah F, Roosink M, Winkens L, John A, Hazebroek E, Witteveen A, Berendsen A. The representation of different populations in studies assessing the validity of consumer wearable PPG-based measurements: scoping review (Preprint). JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2025 View