Search Results (1 to 10 of 1604 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 429 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 295 JMIR Research Protocols
- 146 JMIR Formative Research
- 142 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 103 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 78 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 60 JMIR Dermatology
- 56 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 51 JMIR Human Factors
- 39 JMIR Mental Health
- 25 JMIR Cancer
- 20 JMIR Aging
- 20 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 19 JMIR Medical Education
- 16 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 14 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 14 JMIR Serious Games
- 11 JMIR Cardio
- 11 JMIR Diabetes
- 10 Iproceedings
- 9 JMIR AI
- 8 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 7 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 4 JMIR Infodemiology
- 4 JMIR Nursing
- 4 JMIRx Med
- 2 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 2 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 1 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 1 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 1 JMIR Data
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
We observed stability in BMI across days (r>0.95; P
The Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) 17.0 D [83] was selected due to previous evidence of good discriminant validity [84-87], IRR (0.83 to 0.99) [88,89], and good internal consistency of the restraint and body image subscales (Cronbach α>0.70) [90].
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e66554
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Effect estimates, 95% CIs, and descriptive P values will be reported whenever possible, along with corresponding graphs.
A post hoc analysis will attempt to identify variables of interest using the appropriate global linear model.
Since the intervention is considered low risk, no interim analysis is planned. In case of missing primary outcome data, patients will be withdrawn from the analysis. Patients missing secondary outcome data will remain in the study but be excluded from those specific analyses.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e62659
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Compared to baseline, average PG-SGA malnutrition scores saw a decrease of 6 points (P=.01), with a corresponding reduction in patients with high malnutrition risk (P=.03; Table 4). Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—General scores increased by an average of 20.5 points (P=.002), and Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Treatment—Anorexia/Cachexia Scale scores increased by an average of 7.4 points (P=.03), indicating an improvement in participants’ health-related quality of life.
JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e67108
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Statistical significance was defined as P
Of the 3684 participants screened for eligibility, 633 participants were excluded (346 declined participation and 287 did not meet eligibility criteria; Figure 2). The program started with 3051 participants, of which 2367 participants completed it, translating into a completion rate of 77.6%.
Study flowchart.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e68242
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
P values for the chi-square test are given.
a EV: embryonic volume.
b Not applicable.
c GA: gestational age.
d HV: head volume.
For the HV, a total of 475 ultrasound scans of 326 participants were included. The data were divided over similar subsets. The development set contained 383 ultrasound scans of 261 participants acquired before 2020. The test set contained 92 ultrasound scans of 65 participants acquired before 2020. The future test set contained 80 ultrasound scans of 58 participants acquired in 2020.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e60887
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The scoping review protocol has been registered on the Open Science Framework Registries [30] and was guided by and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) [31]. The completed PRISMA-P checklist can be found in Multimedia Appendix 1. The results of the scoping review will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-Sc R) checklist [32].
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e65733
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS