e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 6 of 6 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 2 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 1 JMIR Human Factors
- 1 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 1 JMIR Research Protocols
- 1 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
A recent qualitative systematic review on stakeholder perspectives of clinical AI implementation identified the following key stakeholder groups influencing implementation: patients, carers, and the public; health care professionals; health care managers and leaders; regulators and policy makers; and developers [44].
JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e50568
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Stakeholders included: patients with prediabetes and their support network (eg, caregivers and partners), primary care providers, health technologists, programmers and computer scientists, behavioral change theorists and subject matter experts, the research administrative team, and d DPP product developers and coaches.
JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e52885
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Developers’ concerns regarding violation of privacy focused on the sharing of sensitive health information not germane to a developer’s task (participant P30).
The primary harm to groups mentioned by developers was the possibility of systematic bias in an algorithm’s outcomes leading to medically unjustified differences in treatments among certain sociopolitical groups.
J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e47609
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Incorporating Consumers’ Needs in Nutrition Apps to Promote and Maintain Use: Mixed Methods Study
Therefore, nutrition app developers should pay particular attention to a complete and trustworthy food database and the user-friendliness of the app.
Finally, in our qualitative study, we found that nutrition apps can be specifically helpful for new users and that the learning curve is steepest in the beginning. A recent study by Samoggia et al [42] shows that a nutrition-information app is indeed mostly effective among consumers with limited knowledge.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2023;11:e39515
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Challenges With Developing Secure Mobile Health Applications: Systematic Review
Our review’s objective was to identify and codify the challenges that hinder m Health app developers from developing secure apps. This review’s findings would enable us to identify the potential gaps that need to be further investigated based on the developers’ perspectives.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(6):e15654
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The State of Open Source Electronic Health Record Projects: A Software Anthropology Study
The core success of the open source movement depends on developers who contribute their knowledge and effort for free to the community. Developers are either unpaid volunteers, hobbyists [20], or employees who are paid to write code. A study of mainstream F/OSS projects categorized developers’ contribution into eight different roles: project leader, core member, active developers, peripheral developer, bug fixer, bug reporter, reader, and passive user [4].
JMIR Med Inform 2017;5(1):e6
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS