e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 15 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 4 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 4 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 3 JMIR Formative Research
- 1 Iproceedings
- 1 JMIR Cardio
- 1 JMIR Human Factors
- 1 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

In healthy populations, wearable devices such as smartwatches are frequently used as motivational and self-monitoring tools for physical activity [11-14]. These wearable physical activity tracker devices offer considerable advantages in health care and personalized physical activity management in populations with chronic disease [15]. The gait of these patients can be different than those of healthy persons and may therefore influence the wearable device’s accuracy [16-19].
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e58964
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

(2) What are the characteristics of the smartwatches and activity trackers being used for health-related applications with children aged 5 to 11 years (eg, device type and features included)? (3) What is the feasibility and acceptability of using smartwatches and activity trackers for health-related applications with children aged 5 to 11 years?
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e62944
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

A significant development is Germany’s recent legislation, which allows patients to transfer health data collected by smartwatches directly into their health records [7].
Numerous studies explore the integration of smartwatches into health care [8-14]. Yet, many studies concentrate on particular facets or stand-alone applications of smartwatches, often lacking a comprehensive framework that encompasses the diverse challenges and opportunities these devices present.
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e58936
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Using a Smartwatch App to Understand Young Adult Substance Use: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study
Moreover, smartwatches offer extensive health-sensing features that allow individuals to track and understand health behaviors. Thus, in recent years, there has been wide adoption of smartwatches: globally, approximately 202 million individuals own smartwatches [17], with 1 in 5 Americans using a smartwatch or fitness tracker [18]. This uptake of smartwatches by consumers has propelled researchers to investigate how smartwatches can be used as instruments of behavioral health studies.
JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e50795
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Reference 33: Accuracy of commercially available smartwatches in assessing energy expenditure duringsmartwatches
JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e52312
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Wearable devices, such as smartwatches and fitness trackers, have emerged as a promising tool for detecting mental health conditions. Several studies have investigated wearables data in combination with machine learning algorithms to detect various mental health conditions, such as depression, anxiety, and bipolar disorder, by analyzing physiological data, such as heart rate and sleep patterns [29,30].
JMIR Res Protoc 2023;12:e48210
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

In one meta-analysis that included 5 observational studies of smartwatches, the sensitivity and specificity were 93% and 94%, respectively, and PPG provided slightly better diagnostic accuracy than single-lead ECG, although there was heterogeneity among the studies [5]. Another review of 18 studies, nearly all of which used PPG, estimated that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of smartwatches for the detection of cardiac arrhythmias were 100%, 95%, and 97%, respectively [37].
JMIR Cardio 2023;7:e47292
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section