This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

mHealth in a Clinical Setting (582) Clinical Information and Decision Making (1340) Knowledge Translation and Implementation Science (375) Quality Evaluation and Descriptive Analysis/Reviews of Multiple Existing Mobile Apps (363)

Published on in Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Oct-Dec

Breadth of Coverage, Ease of Use, and Quality of Mobile Point-of-Care Tool Information Summaries: An Evaluation

Breadth of Coverage, Ease of Use, and Quality of Mobile Point-of-Care Tool Information Summaries: An Evaluation

Breadth of Coverage, Ease of Use, and Quality of Mobile Point-of-Care Tool Information Summaries: An Evaluation

Authors of this article:

Emily Johnson1 Author Orcid Image ;   Vamsi K Emani2 Author Orcid Image ;   Jinma Ren3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (11) Tweetations (8) Metrics

Journals

  1. Koletsi D, Solmi M, Pandis N, Fleming P, Correll C, Ioannidis J. Most recommended medical interventions reach P < 0.005 for their primary outcomes in meta-analyses. International Journal of Epidemiology 2020;49(3):885 View
  2. Sims M, Hodges Shaw M, Gilbertson S, Storch J, Halterman M. Legal and ethical issues surrounding the use of crowdsourcing among healthcare providers. Health Informatics Journal 2019;25(4):1618 View
  3. Park S, Purnell M, Freeman M, Reese R, Varga S. Preference and Frequency of Mobile Phone App Use for Drug Information Among Student Pharmacists. Journal of Pharmacy Technology 2017;33(3):87 View
  4. Ahmed S, Zimba O, Gasparyan A. Moving towards online rheumatology education in the era of COVID-19. Clinical Rheumatology 2020;39(11):3215 View
  5. Doshi A, Connally L, Johnson A, Skrzypek A. Creating a centralized social media recruitment service for research teams at the University of Michigan. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 2021;5(1) View
  6. Gyawali B, Darrow J, Kesselheim A. Integrating New Effectiveness Data Into US Food and Drug Administration–Approved Drug Labeling. JAMA Internal Medicine 2021;181(7):897 View
  7. Baxter S, Lander L, Clay B, Bell J, Hansen K, Walker A, Tai-Seale M. Comparing the Use of DynaMed and UpToDate by Physician Trainees in Clinical Decision-Making: A Randomized Crossover Trial. Applied Clinical Informatics 2022;13(01):139 View
  8. Lee M, Lin X, Chai J, Lee E, Smith H, Tudor Car L. Smartphone apps for point-of-care information summaries: systematic assessment of the quality and content. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine 2023;28(5):320 View
  9. Ribaut J, DeVito Dabbs A, Dobbels F, Teynor A, Mess E, Hoffmann T, De Geest S. Developing a Comprehensive List of Criteria to Evaluate the Characteristics and Quality of eHealth Smartphone Apps: Systematic Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2024;12:e48625 View
  10. Antonello V, Cunegatto M, Rosin E, Castilhos J, Beduschi F, Bumaguin D, Antonello I, Jimenez M. The Use of Mobile Educational Tools to Improve Antimicrobial Prescription for the Treatment of Acute Pyelonephritis in Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia / RBGO Gynecology and Obstetrics 2019;41(02):097 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Pan A, Zhao F. Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction in Context. View