Published on in Vol 5, No 3 (2017): March

Remote Monitoring of Hypertension Diseases in Pregnancy: A Pilot Study

Remote Monitoring of Hypertension Diseases in Pregnancy: A Pilot Study

Remote Monitoring of Hypertension Diseases in Pregnancy: A Pilot Study

Journals

  1. Perry H, Sheehan E, Thilaganathan B, Khalil A. Home blood‐pressure monitoring in a hypertensive pregnant population. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 2018;51(4):524 View
  2. Vandenberk T, Lanssens D, Storms V, Thijs I, Bamelis L, Grieten L, Gyselaers W, Tang E, Luyten P. Relationship Between Adherence to Remote Monitoring and Patient Characteristics: Observational Study in Women With Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2019;7(8):e12574 View
  3. DeNicola N, Grossman D, Marko K, Sonalkar S, Butler Tobah Y, Ganju N, Witkop C, Henderson J, Butler J, Lowery C. Telehealth Interventions to Improve Obstetric and Gynecologic Health Outcomes. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2020;135(2):371 View
  4. Lanssens D, Vandenberk T, Smeets C, De Cannière H, Vonck S, Claessens J, Heyrman Y, Vandijck D, Storms V, Thijs I, Grieten L, Gyselaers W. Prenatal Remote Monitoring of Women With Gestational Hypertensive Diseases: Cost Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(3):e102 View
  5. Vandenberk T, Storms V, Lanssens D, De Cannière H, Smeets C, Thijs I, Batool T, Vanrompay Y, Vandervoort P, Grieten L. A Vendor-Independent Mobile Health Monitoring Platform for Digital Health Studies: Development and Usability Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2019;7(10):e12586 View
  6. Cairns A, Tucker K, Leeson P, Mackillop L, Santos M, Velardo C, Salvi D, Mort S, Mollison J, Tarassenko L, McManus R. Self-Management of Postnatal Hypertension. Hypertension 2018;72(2):425 View
  7. Lanssens D, Vandenberk T, Lodewijckx J, Peeters T, Storms V, Thijs I, Grieten L, Gyselaers W. Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(4):e10887 View
  8. Vonck S, Staelens A, Lanssens D, Tomsin K, Oben J, Bruckers L, Gyselaers W. Development of a biophysical screening model for gestational hypertensive diseases. Journal of Biomedical Science 2019;26(1) View
  9. Lanssens D, Vonck S, Vandenberk T, Schraepen C, Storms V, Thijs I, Grieten L, Gyselaers W. A Prenatal Remote Monitoring Program in Pregnancies Complicated with Gestational Hypertensive Disorders: What Are the Contributors to the Cost Savings?. Telemedicine and e-Health 2019;25(8):686 View
  10. Mendez D, Sanders S, Karimi H, Gharani P, Rathbun S, Gary-Webb T, Wallace M, Gianakas J, Burke L, Davis E. Understanding Pregnancy and Postpartum Health Using Ecological Momentary Assessment and Mobile Technology: Protocol for the Postpartum Mothers Mobile Study. JMIR Research Protocols 2019;8(6):e13569 View
  11. Niela‐Vilen H, Rahmani A, Liljeberg P, Axelin A. Being ‘A Google Mom’ or securely monitored at home: Perceptions of remote monitoring in maternity care. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2020;76(1):243 View
  12. Xydopoulos G, Perry H, Sheehan E, Thilaganathan B, Fordham R, Khalil A. Home blood‐pressure monitoring in a hypertensive pregnant population: cost‐minimization study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 2019;53(4):496 View
  13. Payakachat N, Rhoads S, McCoy H, Dajani N, Eswaran H, Lowery C. Using mHealth in postpartum women with pre‐eclampsia: Lessons learned from a qualitative study. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2020;149(3):339 View
  14. Gyselaers W, Lanssens D, Perry H, Khalil A. Mobile Health Applications for Prenatal Assessment and Monitoring. Current Pharmaceutical Design 2019;25(5):615 View
  15. Khalil A, Perry H, Lanssens D, Gyselaers W. Telemonitoring for hypertensive disease in pregnancy. Expert Review of Medical Devices 2019;16(8):653 View
  16. Lanssens D, Vonck S, Storms V, Thijs I, Grieten L, Gyselaers W. The impact of a remote monitoring program on the prenatal follow-up of women with gestational hypertensive disorders. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2018;223:72 View
  17. Haddad S, Souza R, Cecatti J. Mobile technology in health (mHealth) and antenatal care–Searching for apps and available solutions: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2019;127:1 View
  18. Aquino M, Munce S, Griffith J, Pakosh M, Munnery M, Seto E. Exploring the Use of Telemonitoring for Patients at High Risk for Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy in the Antepartum and Postpartum Periods: Scoping Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(4):e15095 View
  19. van den Heuvel J, Groenhof T, Veerbeek J, van Solinge W, Lely A, Franx A, Bekker M. eHealth as the Next-Generation Perinatal Care: An Overview of the Literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(6):e202 View
  20. Pealing L, Tucker K, Mackillop L, Crawford C, Wilson H, Nickless A, Temple E, Chappell L, McManus R. A randomised controlled trial of blood pressure self-monitoring in the management of hypertensive pregnancy. OPTIMUM-BP: A feasibility trial. Pregnancy Hypertension 2019;18:141 View
  21. Feroz A, Saleem S, Seto E. Exploring perspectives, preferences and needs of a telemonitoring program for women at high risk for preeclampsia in a tertiary health facility of Karachi: a qualitative study protocol. Reproductive Health 2020;17(1) View
  22. Lanssens D, Thijs I, Gyselaers W, Lanssens D, De Jonge E, Van Holsbeke C, Mesens T, Jacquemyn Y, Mannaerts D, Devlieger R, Van Calsteren K, Logghe H, Lebbe B. Design of the Pregnancy REmote MOnitoring II study (PREMOM II): a multicenter, randomized controlled trial of remote monitoring for gestational hypertensive disorders. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2020;20(1) View
  23. Runkle J, Sugg M, McCrory S, Coulson C. Examining the Feasibility of Smart Blood Pressure Home Monitoring: Advancing Remote Prenatal Care in Rural Appalachia. Telemedicine Reports 2021;2(1):125 View
  24. Bossung V, Kast K. Smart Sensorik in der Schwangerschaft: Narratives Review über die Verlagerung der Schwangerschaftsvorsorge in den Smart Home Bereich. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 2021;164:35 View
  25. Cantor A, Jungbauer R, Totten A, Tilden E, Holmes R, Ahmed A, Wagner J, Hermesch A, McDonagh M. Telehealth Strategies for the Delivery of Maternal Health Care. Annals of Internal Medicine 2022;175(9):1285 View
  26. Bekker M, Koster M, Keusters W, Ganzevoort W, de Haan-Jebbink J, Deurloo K, Seeber L, van der Ham D, Zuithoff N, Frederix G, van den Heuvel J, Franx A. Home telemonitoring versus hospital care in complicated pregnancies in the Netherlands: a randomised, controlled non-inferiority trial (HoTeL). The Lancet Digital Health 2023;5(3):e116 View
  27. Zielinska A, Mullins E, Lees C. The feasibility of multimodality remote monitoring of maternal physiology during pregnancy. Medicine 2022;101(26):e29566 View
  28. LANSSENS D, THIJS I, GYSELAERS W, II-CONSORTIUM P. Pregnancy REmote MOnitoring: de toegevoegde waarde van telemonitoring in de prenatale opvolging van door gestationele hypertensieve aandoeningen gecompliceerde zwangerschappen. Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 2021 View
  29. Mhajna M, Sadeh B, Yagel S, Sohn C, Schwartz N, Warsof S, Zahar Y, Reches A. A Novel, Cardiac-Derived Algorithm for Uterine Activity Monitoring in a Wearable Remote Device. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2022;10 View
  30. Bhalla A, Bhalla R, Ganta S. Working remotely: a perspective on telemedicine in delivery of obstetrics and gynaecology health care. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2021;23(4):237 View
  31. Muehlmann M, Tomczyk S. Mobile Apps for Sexual and Reproductive Health Education: a Systematic Review and Quality Assessment. Current Sexual Health Reports 2023;15(2):77 View
  32. Vican I, Kreković G, Jambrošić K. Improved Fetal Heartbeat Detection Using Pitch Shifting and Psychoacoustics. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022 View
  33. Lanssens D, Vandenberk T, Storms V, Thijs I, Grieten L, Bamelis L, Gyselaers W, Tang E, Luyten P. Changes in Intrapersonal Factors of Participants in the Pregnancy Remote Monitoring Study Who Are at Risk for Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension: Descriptive Quantitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e42686 View
  34. Vican I, Kreković G, Jambrošić K. Improved fetal heartbeat detection using pitch shifting and psychoacoustics. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 2024;90:105850 View
  35. Jones R, Peng C, Jones C, Long B, Helton V, Eswaran H. Cellular-Enabled Remote Patient Monitoring for Pregnancies Complicated by Hypertension. Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal 2024;5(3):156 View
  36. Gerits M, Bielen S, Lanssens D, Luyten J, Gyselaers W. Experience Counts: Unveiling Patients’ Willingness to Pay for Remote Monitoring and Patient Self-Measurement. Value in Health 2024;27(9):1270 View
  37. Gerits M, Bielen S, Lanssens D, Luyten J. Door de ogen van de patiënt: tele- en zelfmonitoring voor zwangere vrouwen met een verhoogd risico op hypertensie. Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 2024 View
  38. Abdalla Elsheikh N, Abdelgadir Elhabeeb S, M Osman H, M Alhajri A, S Alsaqoor S, M Alwadai N. Effectiveness of Telehealth in Obstetric and Gynecologic Care: A Systematic Review of Health Outcomes. Cureus 2024 View
  39. Rajkumar T, Hennessy A, Makris A. Remote blood pressure monitoring in women at risk of or with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2024 View