Published on in Vol 6, No 8 (2018): August

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/10063, first published .
A Web-Based Survey Assessing the Attitudes of Health Care Professionals in Germany Toward the Use of Telemedicine in Pregnancy Monitoring: Cross-Sectional Study

A Web-Based Survey Assessing the Attitudes of Health Care Professionals in Germany Toward the Use of Telemedicine in Pregnancy Monitoring: Cross-Sectional Study

A Web-Based Survey Assessing the Attitudes of Health Care Professionals in Germany Toward the Use of Telemedicine in Pregnancy Monitoring: Cross-Sectional Study

Journals

  1. Schramm K, Nees J, Hoffmann J, Bruckner T, Haun M, Maatouk I, Stepan H, Schott S. Emergency consultations in obstetrics: identification of decisive, contributing and associated factors. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2020;302(4):821 View
  2. Kasaven L, Saso S, Barcroft J, Yazbek J, Joash K, Stalder C, Ben Nagi J, Smith J, Lees C, Bourne T, Jones B. Implications for the future of Obstetrics and Gynaecology following the COVID‐19 pandemic: a commentary. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2020;127(11):1318 View
  3. Niela‐Vilen H, Rahmani A, Liljeberg P, Axelin A. Being ‘A Google Mom’ or securely monitored at home: Perceptions of remote monitoring in maternity care. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2020;76(1):243 View
  4. Vickery M, van Teijlingen E, Hundley V, Smith G, Way S, Westwood G. Midwives’ views towards women using mHealth and eHealth to self-monitor their pregnancy: A systematic review of the literature. European Journal of Midwifery 2020;4(September):1 View
  5. Schramm K, Grassl N, Nees J, Hoffmann J, Stepan H, Bruckner T, Haun M, Maatouk I, Haist M, Schott T, Sohn C, Schott S. Women’s Attitudes Toward Self-Monitoring of Their Pregnancy Using Noninvasive Electronic Devices: Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2019;7(1):e11458 View
  6. Thapa S, Nielsen J, Aldahmash A, Qadri F, Leppin A. Willingness to Use Digital Health Tools in Patient Care Among Health Care Professionals and Students at a University Hospital in Saudi Arabia: Quantitative Cross-sectional Survey. JMIR Medical Education 2021;7(1):e18590 View
  7. van den Heuvel J, Ayubi S, Franx A, Bekker M. Home-Based Monitoring and Telemonitoring of Complicated Pregnancies: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey of Current Practice in the Netherlands. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(10):e18966 View
  8. Størksen H, Haga S, Slinning K, Drozd F. Health Personnel’s Perceived Usefulness of Internet-Based Interventions for Parents of Children Younger Than 5 Years: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey Study. JMIR Mental Health 2020;7(11):e15149 View
  9. Bossung V, Kast K. Smart Sensorik in der Schwangerschaft: Narratives Review über die Verlagerung der Schwangerschaftsvorsorge in den Smart Home Bereich. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 2021;164:35 View
  10. Trinh T, Schwarze C, Müller M, Goetz M, Hassdenteufel K, Wallwiener M, Wallwiener S. Implementing a Perinatal Depression Screening in Clinical Routine: Exploring the Patientʼs Perspective. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 2022;82(10):1082 View
  11. YALÇIN S, SAYAL H. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Prenatal Care Clinics; Late Diagnosis?. Avrasya Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2022;5(1):77 View
  12. Gemperle M, Grylka-Baeschlin S, Klamroth-Marganska V, Ballmer T, Gantschnig B, Pehlke-Milde J. Midwives’ perception of advantages of health care at a distance during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland. Midwifery 2022;105:103201 View
  13. Carboni C, Wehrens R, van der Veen R, de Bont A. Conceptualizing the digitalization of healthcare work: A metaphor-based Critical Interpretive Synthesis. Social Science & Medicine 2022;292:114572 View
  14. Schäfer F, Quinquis L, Klein M, Escutnaire J, Chavanel F, Chevallier H, Fagherazzi G. Attitudes and Expectations of Clinical Research Participants Toward Digital Health and Mobile Dietary Assessment Tools: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. Frontiers in Digital Health 2022;4 View
  15. Montazeri M, Galavi Z, Ahmadian L. The role of mobile health in prevention, diagnosis, treatment and self-care of COVID-19 from the healthcare professionals’ perspectives. DIGITAL HEALTH 2023;9 View
  16. Størksen H, Nielsen B, Haga S, Drozd F. Internet interventions for parents of young children: A cross-sectional study of health, social, and welfare professionals’ attitudes to their use. Children and Youth Services Review 2023;155:107253 View
  17. Rettinger L, Putz P, Aichinger L, Javorszky S, Widhalm K, Ertelt-Bach V, Huber A, Sargis S, Maul L, Radinger O, Werner F, Kuhn S. Telehealth Education in Allied Health Care and Nursing: Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey of Students’ Perceived Knowledge, Skills, Attitudes, and Experience. JMIR Medical Education 2024;10:e51112 View
  18. Golden B, Elrefaay S, McLemore M, Alspaugh A, Baltzell K, Franck L. Midwives’ experience of telehealth and remote care: a systematic mixed methods review. BMJ Open 2024;14(3):e082060 View
  19. Karim J, Wan R, Tabet R, Chiu D, Talhouk A. Person-Generated Health Data in Women’s Health: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e53327 View
  20. Kabir H, Hasan M, Jamil S, Chowdhury S, Mitra D. Knowledge, perceived benefits, perceived concerns, and predisposition to use telehealth services in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Digital Health 2024;2(1) View
  21. Nielsen J, Jepsen I, Eriksen S, Maimburg R. Development and early implementation of telemonitoring of complicated pregnancies – A qualitative study with the perspectives of health professionals. Midwifery 2024;138:104149 View