This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

mHealth for Wellness, Behavior Change and Prevention (2922) Innovations and Technology for Healthy Eating Education (425) Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) (321)

Published on in Vol 7, No 11 (2019): November

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/12298, first published .
Effects of a Smartphone-Based Approach-Avoidance Intervention on Chocolate Craving and Consumption: Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of a Smartphone-Based Approach-Avoidance Intervention on Chocolate Craving and Consumption: Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of a Smartphone-Based Approach-Avoidance Intervention on Chocolate Craving and Consumption: Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors of this article:

Adrian Meule1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Anna Richard1 Author Orcid Image ;   Radomir Dinic3 Author Orcid Image ;   Jens Blechert4 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (11) Tweetations (4) Metrics

Journals

  1. Mehl N, Morys F, Villringer A, Horstmann A. Unhealthy yet Avoidable—How Cognitive Bias Modification Alters Behavioral and Brain Responses to Food Cues in Individuals with Obesity. Nutrients 2019;11(4):874 View
  2. Kahveci S, Meule A, Lender A, Blechert J. Food approach bias is moderated by the desire to eat specific foods. Appetite 2020;154:104758 View
  3. Meule A. Twenty Years of the Food Cravings Questionnaires: a Comprehensive Review. Current Addiction Reports 2020;7(1):30 View
  4. Moore H, White M, Finlayson G, King N. Exploring acute and non-specific effects of mobile app-based response inhibition training on food evaluation and intake. Appetite 2022;178:106181 View
  5. Houben K, Aulbach M. Is there a difference between stopping and avoiding? A review of the mechanisms underlying Go/No-Go and Approach-Avoidance training for food choice. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 2023;49:101245 View
  6. Navas J, Verdejo‐García A, Vadillo M. The evidential value of research on cognitive training to change food‐related biases and unhealthy eating behavior: A systematic review and p‐curve analysis. Obesity Reviews 2021;22(12) View
  7. König L, Van Emmenis M, Nurmi J, Kassavou A, Sutton S. Characteristics of smartphone-based dietary assessment tools: a systematic review. Health Psychology Review 2022;16(4):526 View
  8. Aulbach M, van Alebeek H, Kahveci S, Blechert J. Testing the effectiveness of a mobile approach avoidance intervention and measuring approach biases in an ecological momentary assessment context: study protocol for a randomised-controlled trial. BMJ Open 2023;13(4):e070443 View
  9. Moore H, White M, Finlayson G, King N. Can smartphone‐based response inhibition training elicit sustained changes in appetite, preference, and cravings for energy‐dense foods? A free‐living randomized controlled trial. British Journal of Health Psychology 2024;29(1):165 View
  10. Kahveci S, van Alebeek H, Blechert J. The dual-feature approach-avoidance task: validity, training efficacy, and the role of contingency awareness in changing food preference. Cognition and Emotion 2024:1 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Eiler T, Forneberg T, Grünewald A, Machulska A, Klucken T, Jahn K, Niehaves B, Gethmann C, Brück R. Information Technology in Biomedicine. View