Accuracy of Consumer Wearable Heart Rate Measurement During an Ecologically Valid 24-Hour Period: Intraindividual Validation Study

Readers: No access to all 28 journals. We recommend accessing our articles via PubMed Central
Authors: No access to the submission form or your user account.
Reviewers: No access to your user account. Please download manuscripts you are reviewing for offline reading before Monday, March 11, 2019 at 4:00 PM .
Editors: No access to your user account to assign reviewers or make decisions.
Copyeditors: No access to user account. Please download manuscripts you are copyediting before Monday, March 11, 2019 at 4:00 PM .

Works citing "Accuracy of Consumer Wearable Heart Rate Measurement During an Ecologically Valid 24-Hour Period: Intraindividual Validation Study"

Benjamin W Nelson, Nicholas B Allen

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019 (Mar 11); 7(3):e10828

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/10828):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

Bent B, Goldstein BA, Kibbe WA, Dunn JP. Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors. npj Digital Medicine 2020;3(1)
CrossRef
Müller AM, Wang NX, Yao J, Tan CS, Low ICC, Lim N, Tan J, Tan A, Müller-Riemenschneider F. Heart Rate Measures From Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in a Laboratory and Free-Living Setting: Validation Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2019;7(10):e14120
CrossRef
O’Driscoll R, Turicchi J, Hopkins M, Gibbons C, Larsen SC, Palmeira AL, Heitmann BL, Horgan GW, Finlayson G, Stubbs RJ. The validity of two widely used commercial and research-grade activity monitors, during resting, household and activity behaviours. Health and Technology 2019;
CrossRef