Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Monday, March 11, 2019 at 4:00 PM to 4:30 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Advertisement

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 17.04.19 in Vol 7, No 4 (2019): April

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at http://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/13250, first published Dec 28, 2018.

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

    Review

    Application of Mobile Health Technologies Aimed at Salt Reduction: Systematic Review

    1Krieger School of Arts and Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States

    2The George Institute for Global Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China

    3Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    4School of Health Humanities, Peking University, Beijing, China

    5Public Health Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan

    *these authors contributed equally

    Corresponding Author:

    Puhong Zhang, PhD

    The George Institute for Global Health

    Peking University Health Science Center

    Level 18, Tower B, Horizon Tower, No 6 Zhichun Rd Haidian District

    Beijing,

    China

    Phone: 86 10 8280 0577 ext 512

    Fax:86 10 8280 0177

    Email:


    ABSTRACT

    Background: High salt consumption has contributed to the rise of noncommunicable diseases around the world. The application of mobile health (mHealth) technologies has witnessed rapid growth in recent years. However, evidence to support mHealth interventions to confront the challenge of salt reduction has not yet been critically reviewed.

    Objective: The aim of this study was to identify, characterize, and evaluate mHealth interventions aimed at salt reduction across the world.

    Methods: A systematic search of studies in English or Chinese language published from January 1, 1992 to July 31, 2017 was conducted using 4 English databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Global Health, and Cochrane) and 3 Chinese databases (Wanfang, China Science and Technology Journal, and China National Knowledge of Infrastructure). All studies directly using mobile technologies in health care with a primary or secondary objective of reducing dietary salt consumption were included.

    Results: A total of 1609 articles were found using the search strategy, with 11 full articles (8 English and 3 Chinese) being included for data extraction, including 11 interventional studies. Overall, few high-quality interventions were identified. Most interventions were limited by small study population sample sizes, lack of control groups, and short follow-up times, all of which were obstacles in generating long-term scalable approaches. Most interventions employed short message service as a platform for mHealth interventions, whereas some innovative mHealth technologies were also explored. Most interventions had a primary focus of improving awareness of dietary salt consumption. The outcome variables used to measure intervention effectiveness included 24-hour urinary sodium excretion, spot urine sampling, dietary records, and indirect behavior or knowledge indicators targeting salt consumption. Although most interventions displayed positive outcome results, none of them provided reliable evidence to evaluate the effectiveness of salt reduction.

    Conclusions: Salt reduction in mHealth initiatives remains relatively unexplored; however, studies that did intervene on salt-reduction show the potential of mHealth as an effective intervention method. We provide 3 recommendations for future mHealth interventions in salt reduction—(1) increased use of new, innovative, and interactive mHealth technologies; (2) development of mHealth interventions with primary prevention measures and goals of salt reduction; and (3) large-scale, rigorously designed, and object-targeted clinical trials of mHealth interventions with appropriate quantitative outcome variables, in particular 24-hour urine sodium.

    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7(4):e13250

    doi:10.2196/13250

    KEYWORDS



    Introduction

    Salt Consumption and Its Impact on Health

    Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) have become one of the leading causes of disease globally, and their impact on the global health burden has recently surpassed that of infectious diseases [1,2]. In fact, the burden of NCDs in developing countries seems to be worsening, with projections suggesting that by 2020, 7 out of 10 deaths in developing countries will be a result of NCDs [3]. Among the various dietary determinants of detrimental health outcomes, high salt intake has been noted as a key contributing factor for the prevalence of NCDs around the world. High-salt diets are linked to elevated blood pressure, a major risk factor for heart diseases and stroke, which in turn are among the leading causes of death worldwide [4-7]. In fact, salt reduction has been identified as 1 of the 5 priority interventions in response to the global NCD crisis [8]. Developing countries, in particular, have experienced a notable rise of excessive salt intake [9], with Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Thailand, China, and Vietnam among the countries falling within the top 20 highest consumers of salt in 2010 [10].

    Impact of Salt-Reduction Initiatives on Disease Burden of Noncommunicable Diseases

    The millennium development goals have emphasized an urgent need for adequate and equitable health services through the improvement of global health systems [11]. NCDs such as cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have placed an increasing burden on the developing world, with 80% of all CVD-related deaths occurring in low- to middle-income countries [12]. Insufficiencies in health services are also reflected in the notable significance of health equity challenges in low-income countries [13]. Reducing dietary salt intakes is increasingly being foregrounded as a highly effective and implementable measure of reducing the burden of NCDs globally. Research has shown that a 15% reduction in population salt intake could prevent 8.5 million cardiovascular deaths over 10 years in 23 developing countries and result in major cost savings [14]. Following the 2011 Moscow global ministerial conference, the United Nations identified salt reduction as among its 3 key cost-effective priority actions to reduce the risk of NCDs [15]. In 2013, the World Health Organization (WHO) identified a 30% mean reduction of population salt intake as one of its 9 global targets of reducing NCDs [16].

    Salt Reduction Interventions Globally

    Globally, more countries are now conducting various interventions and formulating strategies to reduce population-wide salt intake to prevent and control NCDs. The main implementation strategies for salt reduction are food reformulation, consumer education, front-of-pack labeling, interventions in public institution settings (such as schools, hospitals, and the workplace), and taxation [17]. Almost all countries are multifaceted in their approach to dietary salt reduction, and consumer awareness and education activities are often used in conjunction with other salt-reduction interventions. However, different countries may need different salt-reduction strategies and interventions [17]. For example, in most developed countries, salt reduction can be achieved by reduction in the amount of salt added to food by the food industry. In contrast, in some developing countries such as China, where salt added by consumers during cooking or in sauces plays a bigger role in population salt intake, salt-reduction interventions tend to target settings such as schools, workplaces, or hospitals and focus more on public health campaigns to encourage consumers to use less salt [17]. Although many of the traditional approaches to salt reduction have been evaluated and significant reductions in salt intake observed [18], most of these interventions are resource intensive and limited in population reach. Therefore, with the rapid change of technology, mobile health (mHealth) represents a potential platform that can be used to address some of these challenges.

    Rapid Growth of Mobile Technologies and Development of Mobile Health

    The mobile technologies sector has been a field of great innovation and improvement in recent years. The number of mobile phone users are estimated to have surpassed 5 billion in 2017 [19], and in China alone, there are an estimated 788 million people who access internet via mobile phones (or about 98.3% of the total Chinese internet-using population) as of June 2018 [20]. Given this potential, mobile technologies have played an increasingly significant role in the health sector. mHealth has been defined as “medical and public health practice supported by mobile devices, such as mobile phones, patient monitoring devices, personal digital assistants (PDAs), and other wireless devices” [21]. There are several key functions of mHealth, including health education, data collection, electronic data systems, and clinical decision support systems [22-24].

    Aims and Objectives

    Despite the strong advocacy of mHealth as an innovative tool for improving both quality and access of health care [25-27], there remains a great need of continued systematic academic evaluations of its direct impact on key health outcomes [28-33]. Can mHealth be used as an innovative and effective long-term means of addressing global salt-reduction objectives? Currently there is no systematic review yet to describe the use of mHealth apps for salt-reduction purposes. The specific aims of this systematic review are to (1) characterize mHealth developments aimed at dietary salt reduction across the world, (2) evaluate the impact and effectiveness of mHealth interventions focused on salt reduction, and (3) identify the success factors and gaps in mHealth intervention development and evaluation on salt reduction that need to be addressed in the future.


    Methods

    Database Search

    We followed the methods detailed in a peer-reviewed systematic review protocol that is registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42017075361). A systematic search of the literature in both Chinese and English published from January 1, 1992 to July 31, 2017 was performed following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines [34,35] using 4 English electronic databases—PubMed, MEDLINE, Global Health, and Cochrane; and 3 Chinese databases—Wanfang Database, Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database, and China National Knowledge of Infrastructure. We also searched for registered trials in the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and Clinicaltrial.gov, and some gray literature sources (notably a manual search of reports and government documents). The search equation is built around free-text words referring to mHealth and salt reduction. Keywords used in the English database search strategy include the following: mobile phone, cell phone, mHealth, text message, personal digital assistants, salt consumption, salt reduction, salt management, sodium intake, sodium restriction, and sodium education. Keywords used in the Chinese database search strategy include the following: “Shou Ji” (mobile phone, cell phone), “Yi Dong Jiang Kang” (mHealth), “Yi Dong Yi Liao” (mobile medical), “Yan” (salt), and “Na” (sodium). Multimedia Appendix 1 lists the detailed search strategy for each database.

    Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

    Articles from all countries and with study populations of all ages, genders, and ethnicities were within the scope of this review. A study (with full-text available) was included under the condition that (1) it must include some form of measurement or incorporation of salt education, testing, or consumption data; (2) the study has an mHealth component, with mHealth being defined as “medical and public health practice supported by mobile devices, such as mobile phones, patient monitoring devices, personal digital assistants (PDAs), and other wireless devices” [21]; (3) the types of studies are randomized controlled trials (RCTs), noncontrolled trials, observational studies, qualitative interventional and quasi-experimental (QE) studies, and review studies; (4) it should be written in English or Chinese; and (5) it should be published from 1992 to 2017. A study was excluded if (1) no full-text was available, (2) the full-text was neither in English nor Chinese, (3) it did not include any significant salt-reduction-oriented component, (4) it used exclusively internet of computer or Web-based interventions, (5) it was not conducted on humans, and (6) it focused on biochemistry or microbiology.

    Study Selection

    Using the criteria, 2 independent reviewers conducted the abstract screening process for the English database results, and 2 independent reviewers conducted the abstract screening process for the Chinese database results. Full-text reviews were then conducted based on the results of the abstract screening process using the exclusion criteria; 2 independent reviewers reviewed the results from the English database abstract reviews and 2 independent reviewers reviewed the results from the Chinese database abstract reviews. The determinations made by the independent reviewers were then reconciled into a collective decision; if the 2 reviewers were unable to come to a consensus on the relevance of a particular study, then a third independent reviewer was asked to provide his or her input.

    Data Extraction

    A spreadsheet was developed to extract key data points from the filtered studies. The extraction sheet was pilot-tested on 10 randomly selected records and refined. Information extracted from each study consisted of characteristics of study participants (including age, sex, disease, and setting of the study), study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria (including type of mHealth device used), and relevant outcome measurements (salt-consumption behavior, salt intake, urinary sodium, and usability of the select mHealth device). A meta-analytic statistical comparison was unable to be performed because of the small study sample size and diversity of outcome indicators. All reviewers reached a consensus on all key definitions and interpretations of the data extraction form before the extraction process was commenced. Overall, 2 reviewers independently extracted data from the filtered English studies, and 2 reviewers independently extracted data from the filtered Chinese studies. All extractions were cross-reviewed, and any disagreements were deliberated upon following which, a consensus was reached. If they were unable to reach a consensus, a third reviewer was brought in to provide a definitive input.

    Quality Assessment

    Given the overall low methodological quality of QE studies and lack of mature quality assessment tools, we only conducted quality assessment for RCTs. For RCTs, methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Specifically, the criteria used to evaluate each study included the random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants, personnel and outcome assessors, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting, and other sources of bias. In addition, 2 reviewers independently conducted a quality assessment for each study, and any discrepancies in judgment were discussed and resolved. If discrepancies remained, a third reviewer was invited to make a final judgment.


    Results

    Included Studies

    We retrieved 1609 articles from the Chinese and English search terms (835 through English search terms and 774 through Chinese search terms), 75 of which were collectively selected for full-text review (50 from the English search and 25 from the Chinese search). The 64 articles were excluded for the reasons specified in Figure 1.

    Figure 1. Study flowchart. CNKI: China National Knowledge Infrastructure; CSTJ: China Science and Technology Journal.
    View this figure

    Study Characteristics

    The 11 included studies and their key characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Of these, 6 were RCTs [36-41] and 5 were QE studies [42-46]. Overall, 64% (n=7/11) studies had small sample sizes (had <100 participants), and 73% (8/11) had short follow-up time (<3 months in duration). Although all interventional studies directly evaluated changes in a salt-intake-related variable following an mHealth intervention, only 3 studies had an explicit primary objective of reducing dietary salt intake [36,38,46].

    Table 1. Summary of key characteristics of included studies (n=11).
    View this table

    A summary of the mHealth technologies used across the studies is displayed in Table 2. Short message service (SMS) was the most common form of mHealth intervention (n=6) [36,39,40,41,45,46]. Some studies incorporated a multimethod mHealth intervention approach, including combining SMS with QQ (Tencent) - an instant communication software in China similar to Facebook and Twitter [45] - and combining SMS with educational pamphlets [41]. Interactive mobile phone apps were used by 5 studies [36-38,42,44]. Of the intervention studies, most (n=8) had a primary focus of improving awareness and education on dietary salt consumption. Direct nutritional guidance by medical experts or passive dissemination of specific strategies or background information pertaining to salt-reduction was commonly employed [37,39-41,45,46]. Moreover, 1 study explored a more active form of health promotion by using a mobile phone app to allow consumers to scan packaged foods and beverages for nutritional information as well as low-salt alternatives [36]. Overall, 4 studies focused on disease management or the monitoring of diet trends [37,38,42,44], all of which involved a component of written input of daily consumption information. Moreover, 2 of the studies also involved photographic input of daily consumption information [37,44], 2 studies involved an audio component [37,42], and 1 study involved a video component [37]. For the function of mHealth interventions, 7 studies used mHealth for health education and awareness to patients [36,37,39-41,43,46], 3 studies used apps to monitor behaviors [38,42,44], and 1 study used SMS to provide self-care reminders to patients [45].

    The majority of the studies were conducted in an urban area (n=9) [36-40,42,43,45,46], whereas the other 2 studies did not mention about rural or urban areas. Overall, 5 studies occurred in community settings [36,38,40,42,44], whereas 6 occurred in hospital settings [37,39,41,43,45,46]. The most common disease focus was hypertension (n=3) [37,39,45], whereas other studies centered around heart failure (n=2) [43,46], CVDs (n=1) [36], diabetes (n=1) [44], metabolic syndrome (n=1) [41], and any NCDs (n=1) [40].

    Effectiveness of Mobile Health

    The salt-reduction-related outcome variables employed by the studies with RCT or QE study designs are summarized in Table 3.

    Table 2. Technologies used in the randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies (n=11). A checkmark indicates that the technology was observed in the study, while an em dash indicates that it was not.
    View this table
    Table 3. Primary outcome and outcome variables employed by studies categorized by study design and if with successful salt reduction (n=11).
    View this table
    Table 4. Summary of effectiveness results (among the 11 randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies).
    View this table

    The primary categories examined 24-hour urinary sodium excretion, spot urine sampling, dietary records, and indirect behavior or knowledge indicators targeting salt consumption. The dietary record category included any self-reported measurements of daily salt intake. The behavior or knowledge indicators category reflected study-specific measurements of changes in either behavior or knowledge variables that linked with sodium consumption tendencies. The results of the outcome variables are summarized in Table 4.

    Overall, a majority of the studies (8/11, 73%) showed a positive result in the salt consumption-related outcome indicators examined.

    No RCT or QE study evaluated the effectiveness of salt reduction using the 24-hour urine collection method. Dietary sodium consumption records were measured through 24-hour dietary recalls [42,44] as well as changes in participants reporting daily salt consumption above 10 g per day [41] and below 6 g per day [40,45]. Most studies displayed positive results; self-reported reductions in the frequency of days of high salt consumption (more than 10 g/day) [41] as observed, along with increased self-reporting of salt consumption of less than 6 g per day [40,45]. Moreover, 1 intervention noted a poststudy daily salt intake decrease of approximately 0.8 g per day [42]. Salt consumption-related behavior or knowledge outcome indicators included Self-Care Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) [46]; survey questions on whether participants ate salty foods [44,39]; salt content of household packaged food purchases [36]; self-identified salt consumption patterns of either “light,” “medium,” or “heavy” [37]; and self-motivation to reduce salt consumption. Overall, 4 studies found no statistically significant difference in salt consumption behavior post intervention [36,37,39,44]. Among studies with positive results, 1 study showed improvements in the SCHFI index questions on maintenance of low-salt diets and reductions in salt intake [46], whereas another study found that 84% of participants agreed the mHealth game used in the intervention motivated them to restrict their salt intake [43]. Indeed, overall, given the large discrepancies in study methodology and mHealth technologies employed within this study, systematically and conclusively identifying key success factors in mHealth interventions targeting salt consumption remain difficult.

    Quality Assessment

    Using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, the majority of the bias risk criteria for the included RCTs remained either unclear or low (Multimedia Appendix 2). The quality of 5 QE studies was not assessed.


    Discussion

    Principal Findings

    mHealth is becoming increasingly popular around the world as the information technology, telecommunication, and health sectors continue to experience waves of innovation. With this progress, the development of mHealth interventions and its evaluation have also become increasingly prominent. In this comprehensive systematic review, we examined the application of mHealth technologies aimed at salt reduction in the published studies and registered trials. We particularly focused on interventional studies but also examined studies of other methodologies examining mHealth in this area. Most (7/11, 64%) studies indicated that mHealth interventions indeed had a positive effect on salt reduction; however, these studies also had very small sample sizes and short intervention periods, whereas none of the RCTs or QEs used the 24-hour urinary excretion measurement method (the gold standard of evaluating salt intake). The overall number of published papers (n=11) remained extremely small, 10 of which (91%) were published on or after 2013, indicating that the evaluation of mHealth technologies for the purposes of dietary salt reduction is indeed at an early stage. A vast majority of the studies examined salt reduction as a mere component of a broader investigation of other macronutrients—only 2 studies focused exclusively on salt reduction [36,38], and few studies had clear objectives and goals of salt reduction. Thus, there is need for greater and more specific focused mHealth interventional research with clear objectives and goals of salt reduction.

    SMS platforms were identified as the most common form of mHealth intervention in salt reduction. However, this review also identified a number of innovative user-engagement methods of mHealth technology that hold potential for further exploration and research. For example, 1 study involved the design of a mobile-device video game that incorporated salt reduction promotion [43], whereas another study examined a mobile app that allowed users to actively scan food products and receive nutritional information as well as targeted low-salt alternatives [36]. Some studies incorporated mobile phone programs with specific regional relevance; the Chinese social media apps QQ and WeChat were used in 2 studies conducted in China [37,45]. Popular global social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube, thus, also hold the potential to be used as tools of health, given the abilities of such platforms to disseminate information quickly, reach broader audiences, customize health messages for specific groups, and encourage interaction and engagement [47,48]. The intensity of user engagement across the mHealth technologies and interventions examined remained relatively minimal and was commonly limited to instructive and reminder-oriented forms of health promotion. Indeed, there is a greater need for further research on various mHealth interventions to better gauge the true potential of mHealth technologies to achieve salt-reduction goals.

    In this review, most studies (8/11, 73%) focused on populations diagnosed with specific salt-related diseases. Many of the salt-reduction initiatives examined tended to be part of broad treatment plans for those already experiencing diseases such as hypertension and cardiovascular illnesses. Nonetheless, some studies examined much broader subgroups, including healthy adults [38], high school students [42], and community residents [40]. Thus, given that high salt intake is an issue identified across multiple general subpopulations [4,5], this review identifies a strong need for mHealth-based salt reduction interventions aimed at disease prevention among healthy populations as opposed to simply disease management as well as targeted interventions to better engage with a wider spectrum of subpopulations.

    With respect to overall effectiveness of mHealth as an interventional tool for dietary salt reduction, given the significant heterogeneity in intervention designs and outcome indicators across the interventional studies, no decisive conclusions pertaining to effectiveness have currently been reached. A majority of the outcome measures focused on qualitative or survey-based indicators. Ultimately, the emphasis on qualitative indicators in the included studies indicates a very strong need for studies that use more quantitative and standardizable measurement indicators. The 24-hour urinary sodium excretion method is considered the gold standard in the measurement of sodium intake [49]. Single 24-hour urinary sodium readings are often subject to high levels of discrepancies between individuals in a population; thus, consecutive 24-hour urinary sodium collection readings over several days can reduce the impact of intraindividual differences. However, 24-hour urinary sodium collection carries a high participant burden of compliance; thus, many studies have to rely on alternative sodium intake measurement options—such as spot urine sampling. None of the interventional studies in the final study sample employed 24-hour urinary sodium measurements as an outcome indicator, whereas only 2 studies utilized spot urine sampling [36,38], signaling a clear need for further mHealth research evaluating changes in salt consumption using high-quality sodium intake measurements.

    It is estimated that a total of 75 countries now have a national salt reduction strategy, with the majority of programs including interventions in public institutions [17,50]. However, across the included studies, China and the United States, the 2 engines of global internet development, are clearly leading the way in mHealth-related interventional research on salt-reduction promotion. We believe that more countries, especially those countries with high dietary salt consumption, will utilize mHealth as an intervention measure to reduce salt consumption for hypertension and CVD prevention and control in the coming years. Likewise, mHealth interventions that can target consumers of salt may particularly benefit countries (such as China) in which the use of large quantities of salt in cooking plays a larger role in population salt intake than food processing and preservation by food industries (which is a more significant problem in countries such as the United States and Japan) [51].

    Quality of the Evidence

    Our review found that most interventional studies were limited by small sample sizes, a lack of control groups and reliable salt-intake measurements, and short follow-up times; the external and internal validities of many studies remain low. Thus, the low-quality nature of this study cannot provide substantive evidence for more scaled-up implementations. Therefore, well-designed health interventions and rigorous evaluation of salt-reduction programs will be vital for future scale-up and policy making.

    Limitations

    There were several limitations in our review. First, we were unable to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate effectiveness of mHealth interventions and conduct further analysis of success factors in mHealth intervention development and evaluation on salt reduction because of the significant heterogeneity of outcome indicators and health issues reported from the very limited number of RCTs. Second, only English and Chinese language articles were included, and only 4 English and 3 Chinese databases were examined. Third, this review focused on academic studies in the literature; mHealth is growing in prominence within the commercial world, and not all of this potential health impact has been studied exclusively in academic contexts.

    Conclusions

    In summary, despite the growth of mHealth and its potential to achieve salt-reduction goals, evidence for a positive effect on health is still limited. Salt-reduction as a primary focus in mHealth initiatives remains relatively unexplored, and the emphasis on salt reduction is not very strong. However, among the included studies, the use of mHealth interventions has generally led to improvements in salt-reduction-related outcomes (notably changes in sodium from spot-urine sampling and dietary salt consumption records). In general, the methodological quality of the studies included in this systematic review is low. However, there are numerous opportunities for research and implementation of mHealth in salt reduction. Moving forward, we have identified 3 priority areas to improve the mHealth research agenda—(1) increased use of new, innovative, and interactive mHealth technologies (such as mobile phone apps) in the context of salt reduction; (2) development of mHealth interventions with primary prevention measures and goals of salt reduction; and (3) large-scale, rigorously designed, and object-targeted clinical trials of mHealth interventions aimed at salt reduction with appropriate quantitative outcome variables, in particular, 24-hour urinary sodium.

    Acknowledgments

    This research was supported by the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Global Health Research Unit Action on Salt China Program under award number 16/136/77. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the sponsors. The sponsors had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author (PZ) had the final responsibility for decision of publication.

    Authors' Contributions

    RL and YL designed the study, and RL and SHA designed the search strategies. SHA, RL, XL, and CT conducted the literature search, screening, and data extraction. SHA and RL conducted data collection, data analysis, and contributed equally to data interpretation and writing. PZ and YL contributed to data interpretation and manuscript revision.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Search strategy.

    PNG File, 698KB

    Multimedia Appendix 2

    Quality assessment of included randomized controlled trials (using Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool).

    PNG File, 279KB

    References

    1. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2095-2128. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Murray CJL, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2197-2223. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Boutayeb A. The double burden of communicable and non-communicable diseases in developing countries. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2006 Mar;100(3):191-199. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Mozaffarian D, Fahimi S, Singh GM, Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, Engell RE, Global Burden of Diseases Nutrition and Chronic Diseases Expert Group. Global sodium consumption and death from cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med 2014 Aug 14;371(7):624-634. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Lava SA, Bianchetti MG, Simonetti GD. Salt intake in children and its consequences on blood pressure. Pediatr Nephrol 2015 Sep;30(9):1389-1396. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Strazzullo P, D'Elia L, Kandala N, Cappuccio FP. Salt intake, stroke, and cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of prospective studies. Br Med J 2009 Nov 24;339:b4567 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Aburto NJ, Ziolkovska A, Hooper L, Elliott P, Cappuccio FP, Meerpohl JJ. Effect of lower sodium intake on health: systematic review and meta-analyses. Br Med J 2013;346:f1326 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Beaglehole R, Bonita R, Horton R, Adams C, Alleyne G, Asaria P, Lancet NCD Action Group, NCD Alliance. Priority actions for the non-communicable disease crisis. Lancet 2011 Apr 23;377(9775):1438-1447. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. A dietary intervention trial for nutritional management of cardiovascular risk factors. Nutr Rev 1997 Feb;55(2):54-56. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Powles J, Fahimi S, Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, Shi P, Ezzati M, Global Burden of Diseases Nutrition and Chronic Diseases Expert Group (NutriCoDE). Global, regional and national sodium intakes in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis of 24 h urinary sodium excretion and dietary surveys worldwide. BMJ Open 2013;3(12):e003733 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Willis-Shattuck M, Bidwell P, Thomas S, Wyness L, Blaauw D, Ditlopo P. Motivation and retention of health workers in developing countries: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2008 Dec 4;8:247 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Bovet P, Paccaud F. Cardiovascular disease and the changing face of global public health: a focus on low and middle income countries. Public Health Rev 2011 Dec 11;33(2):397-415. [CrossRef]
    13. Orach CG. Health equity: challenges in low income countries. Afr Health Sci 2009 Oct;9(Suppl 2):S49-S51 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    14. Asaria P, Chisholm D, Mathers C, Ezzati M, Beaglehole R. Chronic disease prevention: health effects and financial costs of strategies to reduce salt intake and control tobacco use. Lancet 2007 Dec 15;370(9604):2044-2053. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. World Health Organization. 2011. First global ministerial conference on healthy lifestyles and NCDs control   URL: http://www.who.int/nmh/events/moscow_ncds_2011/en/ [accessed 2017-11-12] [WebCite Cache]
    16. World Health Organization. 2013. NCD Global Monitoring Framework   URL: http://www.who.int/nmh/global_monitoring_framework/en/ [accessed 2017-11-13] [WebCite Cache]
    17. Trieu K, Neal B, Hawkes C, Dunford E, Campbell N, Rodriguez-Fernandez R, et al. Salt reduction initiatives around the world–a systematic review of progress towards the global target. PLoS One 2015;10(7):e0130247 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Christoforou A, Trieu K, Land M, Bolam B, Webster J. State-level and community-level salt reduction initiatives: a systematic review of global programmes and their impact. J Epidemiol Community Health 2016 Dec;70(11):1140-1150. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Global System for Mobile Communications. 2017. The Mobile Economy 2017   URL: https://www.gsmaintelligence.com/research/?file=9e927fd6896724e7b26f33f61db5b9d5&download [accessed 2017-12-10] [WebCite Cache]
    20. China Internet Network Information Center. 2018. Statistical Report on the Development of China's Internet   URL: https://cnnic.com.cn/IDR/ReportDownloads/201807/P020180711391069195909.pdf [accessed 2017-12-11] [WebCite Cache]
    21. World Health Organization. 2011. mHealth New horizons for health through mobile technologies   URL: https://www.who.int/goe/publications/goe_mhealth_web.pdf [accessed 2017-11-10] [WebCite Cache]
    22. Labrique AB, Vasudevan L, Kochi E, Fabricant R, Mehl G. mHealth innovations as health system strengthening tools: 12 common applications and a visual framework. Glob Health Sci Pract 2013 Aug;1(2):160-171 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Blaya JA, Fraser HS, Holt B. E-health technologies show promise in developing countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010 Feb;29(2):244-251 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Lindquist AM, Johansson PE, Petersson GI, Saveman B, Nilsson GC. The use of the Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) among personnel and students in health care: a review. J Med Internet Res 2008;10(4):e31 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Kaplan WA. Can the ubiquitous power of mobile phones be used to improve health outcomes in developing countries? Global Health 2006;2:9 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Lester R, Karanja S. Mobile phones: exceptional tools for HIV/AIDS, health, and crisis management. Lancet Infect Dis 2008 Dec;8(12):738-739. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Vodafone. 2005. Africa: The impact of mobile phones   URL: https:/​/www.​vodafone.com/​content/​dam/​vodafone/​about/​public_policy/​policy_papers/​public_policy_series_2.​pdf [accessed 2017-12-09] [WebCite Cache]
    28. Catwell L, Sheikh A. Evaluating eHealth interventions: the need for continuous systemic evaluation. PLoS Med 2009 Aug;6(8):e1000126 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Greenhalgh T, Russell J. Why do evaluations of eHealth programs fail? An alternative set of guiding principles. PLoS Med 2010;7(11):e1000360 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Haberer JE, Kiwanuka J, Nansera D, Wilson IB, Bangsberg DR. Challenges in using mobile phones for collection of antiretroviral therapy adherence data in a resource-limited setting. AIDS Behav 2010 Dec;14(6):1294-1301 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Kahn JG, Yang JS, Kahn JS. 'Mobile' health needs and opportunities in developing countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010 Feb;29(2):252-258 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    32. Lester RT, Ritvo P, Mills EJ, Kariri A, Karanja S, Chung MH, et al. Effects of a mobile phone short message service on antiretroviral treatment adherence in Kenya (WelTel Kenya1): a randomised trial. Lancet 2010 Nov 27;376(9755):1838-1845. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. Pop-Eleches C, Thirumurthy H, Habyarimana JP, Zivin JG, Goldstein MP, de Walque D, et al. Mobile phone technologies improve adherence to antiretroviral treatment in a resource-limited setting: a randomized controlled trial of text message reminders. AIDS 2011 Mar 27;25(6):825-834 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    35. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015 Jan;4:1 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    36. Eyles H, McLean R, Neal B, Jiang Y, Doughty RN, McLean R, et al. A salt-reduction smartphone app supports lower-salt food purchases for people with cardiovascular disease: findings from the SaltSwitch randomised controlled trial. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2017 Dec;24(13):1435-1444. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    37. Zhang J, Ma Q, Li R, Li Y. [Application of mobile phone WeChat software in the follow-up of patients with essential hypertension]. West China Med J 2017;32(1):42-45 http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?filename=DDZT201801021&dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFDTEMP&v=.
    38. Ipjian ML, Johnston CS. Smartphone technology facilitates dietary change in healthy adults. Nutrition 2017 Jan;33:343-347. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    39. Golshahi J, Ahmadzadeh H, Sadeghi M, Mohammadifard N, Pourmoghaddas A. Effect of self-care education on lifestyle modification, medication adherence and blood pressure in hypertensive adults: randomized controlled clinical trial. Adv Biomed Res 2015;4:204 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    40. Yu J, Wang X, Zhou L, Gu C. [The effect of chronic disease health education enhanced by SMS on the knowledge and behavior of community residents]. Chin J Prev Contr Chron Dis 2013;21(2):165-168 http://wuxizazhi.cnki.net/Search/ZMXB201302015.html.
    41. Chen Y, Lin M, Pu X, Wu C, Liu Y. [Management of patients with metabolic syndrome]. Chinese J Practic Intern Med 2008;28(2):29-32.
    42. Lee J, Song S, Ahn JS, Kim Y, Lee JE. Use of a mobile application for self-monitoring dietary intake: feasibility test and an intervention study. Nutrients 2017 Jul 13;9(7) [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    43. Radhakrishnan K, Toprac P, O'Hair M, Bias R, Kim M, Bradley P, et al. Interactive digital e-health game for heart failure self-management: a feasibility study. Games Health J 2016 Dec;5(6):366-374 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    44. Ahn Y, Bae J, Kim H. The development of a mobile u-Health program and evaluation for self-diet management for diabetic patients. Nutr Res Pract 2016 Jun;10(3):342-351 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    45. Huang M. [Investigation on Disease Cognitive Behavior and Nursing Intervention in Patients with Hypertension in Special Needs]. West China Med J 2013;28(2):289-291.
    46. Nundy S, Razi RR, Dick JJ, Smith B, Mayo A, O'Connor A, et al. A text messaging intervention to improve heart failure self-management after hospital discharge in a largely African-American population: before-after study. J Med Internet Res 2013;15(3):e53 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    47. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2011. The Health Communicator's Social Media Toolkit   URL: https://www.cdc.gov/healthcommunication/ToolsTemplates/SocialMediaToolkit_BM.pdf [accessed 2017-11-11] [WebCite Cache]
    48. Hesse BW. Enhancing consumer involvement in health care. In: Parker JC, Thorson E, editors. Health Communication in the New Media Landscape. New York: Springer Publishing; 2009:119-150.
    49. World Health Organization. Reducing salt intake in populations: Report of a WHO forum and technical meeting   URL: https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/SaltReport-VC-April07.pdf [accessed 2018-12-15] [WebCite Cache]
    50. Webster JL, Dunford EK, Hawkes C, Neal BC. Salt reduction initiatives around the world. J Hypertens 2011 Jun;29(6):1043-1050. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    51. Anderson CA, Appel LJ, Okuda N, Brown IJ, Chan Q, Zhao L, et al. Dietary sources of sodium in China, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States, women and men aged 40 to 59 years: the INTERMAP study. J Am Diet Assoc 2010 May;110(5):736-745 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]


    Abbreviations

    CVDs: cardiovascular diseases
    mHealth: mobile health
    NCDs: noncommunicable diseases
    QE: quasi-experimental
    RCT: randomized controlled trial
    SCHFI: Self-Care Heart Failure Index
    SMS: short message service
    WHO: World Health Organization


    Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 28.12.18; peer-reviewed by W Na, C Grimes, C Gonçalves; comments to author 13.02.19; revised version received 27.02.19; accepted 03.03.19; published 17.04.19

    ©Shahmir H Ali, Rong Luo, Yuan Li, Xiangjun Liu, Chengyao Tang, Puhong Zhang. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 17.04.2019.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.