This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

mHealth for Telemedicine and Homecare (418) Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Medicine (235) Hypertension Prevention and Treatment (229) Pregnancy Information, Education and Lifestyle Interventions (304)

Published on in Vol 8, No 8 (2020): August

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/17271, first published .
User Experiences With and Recommendations for Mobile Health Technology for Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: Mixed Methods Study

User Experiences With and Recommendations for Mobile Health Technology for Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: Mixed Methods Study

User Experiences With and Recommendations for Mobile Health Technology for Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: Mixed Methods Study

Authors of this article:

Karin Rolanda Jongsma1 Author Orcid Image ;   Josephus F M van den Heuvel2 Author Orcid Image ;   Jasmijn Rake2 Author Orcid Image ;   Annelien L Bredenoord1 Author Orcid Image ;   Mireille N Bekker2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (19) Tweetations (5) Metrics

Journals

  1. van den Heuvel J, van Lieshout C, Franx A, Frederix G, Bekker M. SAFE@HOME: Cost analysis of a new care pathway including a digital health platform for women at increased risk of preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertension 2021;24:118 View
  2. Bossung V, Kast K. Smart Sensorik in der Schwangerschaft: Narratives Review über die Verlagerung der Schwangerschaftsvorsorge in den Smart Home Bereich. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 2021;164:35 View
  3. Lau Y, Wong S, Cheng L, Lau S. Exploring experiences and needs of perinatal women in digital healthcare: A meta-ethnography of qualitative evidence. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2023;169:104929 View
  4. Han X, Froilan U Garma P, Quan H, Zhang Y, Chumnanvej S. [Retracted] To Explore the Application Effect and Value of Evidence‐Based Nursing in Patients with Pregnancy‐Induced Hypertension Syndrome. Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging 2022;2022(1) View
  5. Pealing L, Tucker K, Fletcher B, Lawley E, Chappell L, McManus R, Ziebland S. Perceptions and experiences of blood pressure self-monitoring during hypertensive pregnancy: A qualitative analysis of women’s and clinicians’ experiences in the OPTIMUM-BP trial. Pregnancy Hypertension 2022;30:113 View
  6. Yeh P, Rhee D, Kennedy C, Zera C, Lucido B, Tunçalp Ö, Gomez Ponce de Leon R, Narasimhan M. Self-monitoring of blood pressure among women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2022;22(1) View
  7. da Silva H, Santos G, Ferreira Leite A, Mesquita C, de Souza Figueiredo P, Miron Stefani C, de Santos Melo N. The feasibility of telehealth in the monitoring of head and neck cancer patients: a systematic review on remote technology, user adherence, user satisfaction, and quality of life. Supportive Care in Cancer 2022;30(10):8391 View
  8. Haddad T, Maita K, Inselman J, Avila F, Torres-Guzman R, Coffey J, Christopherson L, Leuenberger A, Bell S, Pahl D, Garcia J, Manka L, Forte A, Maniaci M. Patient Satisfaction With a Multisite, Multiregional Remote Patient Monitoring Program for Acute and Chronic Condition Management: Survey-Based Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e44528 View
  9. Marbouh D, Swarnakar V, Simsekler M, Antony J, Lizarelli F, Jayaraman R, Garza-Reyes J, Shokri A, Cudney E, Ellahham S. Healthcare 4.0 digital technologies impact on quality of care: a systematic literature review. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 2023;34(15-16):2157 View
  10. Atkinson J, Hastie R, Walker S, Lindquist A, Tong S. Telehealth in antenatal care: recent insights and advances. BMC Medicine 2023;21(1) View
  11. Stephen B, Uzoewulu B, Asuquo P, Ozuomba S. Diabetes and hypertension MobileHealth systems: a review of general challenges and advancements. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science 2023;70(1) View
  12. Valencia S, Barrientos Gómez J, Gómez Ramirez M, Luna I, Caicedo H, Torres-Silva E, Díaz E. Evaluation of a telehealth program for high-risk pregnancy in a health service provider institution. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2023;179:105234 View
  13. Henrich N, Brinson A, Arnold A, Jahnke H. Digital Health Needs and Preferences During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Formative Research 2024;8:e48960 View
  14. Myneni S, Zingg A, Singh T, Ross A, Franklin A, Rogith D, Refuerzo J. Digital health technologies for high-risk pregnancy management: three case studies using Digilego framework. JAMIA Open 2024;7(1) View
  15. Karkada S, Noronha J, Lewis M, Ullal C. ASHA‐led community‐managed intervention programme to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with pregnancy hypertension: A study protocol. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2024;80(12):5128 View
  16. Bendix J, Heinsen M, Backhausen M. “But I’m not a professional” − How women with high-risk pregnancies voice the experiences of home-based telemonitoring; a qualitative interview study. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare 2024;41:101015 View
  17. Awoyemi T, Teeri S, Daniel E, Ogunmola I, Ebili U, Olojakpoke E, Guzman R, Ezekwueme F, Nunes D. A rapid review of telehealth in women with recent de novo hypertensive disease of pregnancy. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension 2024;26(9):1015 View
  18. Kovell L, Denu M, Revoori R, Sadaniantz K, Staples B, Chiriboga G, Forrester S, Lemon S, Moore Simas T, Person S, McManus D, Mazor K. Barriers and facilitators to home blood pressure monitoring in women with pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders: a qualitative study. Journal of Hypertension 2024;42(11):1994 View
  19. Gerits M, Bielen S, Lanssens D, Luyten J. Door de ogen van de patiënt: tele- en zelfmonitoring voor zwangere vrouwen met een verhoogd risico op hypertensie. Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 2024 View