This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Fitness Trackers and Smart Pedometers/Accelerometers (571) Digital Pain Assessment and Management (170) Mobile Health (mhealth) (2982) Instruments and Questionnaires for Physical Activity and Lifestyle (78) mHealth for Symptom and Disease Monitoring, Chronic Disease Management (1428) mHealth for Wellness, Behavior Change and Prevention (2922)

Published on in Vol 9, No 1 (2021): January

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/24806, first published .
Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study

Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study

Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study

Authors of this article:

Veronica Sjöberg1 Author Orcid Image ;   Jens Westergren1 Author Orcid Image ;   Andreas Monnier1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Riccardo Lo Martire3 Author Orcid Image ;   Maria Hagströmer3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Björn Olov Äng1, 3, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Linda Vixner1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (15) Tweetations (5) Metrics

Journals

  1. Murdoch M, Window P, Morton C, O’Donohue R, Ballard E, Claus A. People at a persistent pain service can walk it, but some struggle to talk about it: Reliability, detectable difference and clinically important difference of the six‐minute walk test. Musculoskeletal Care 2023;21(1):221 View
  2. Mateos A, Zorrilla-Revilla G, Rodríguez J. Let’s Play at Digging. Human Nature 2022;33(2):172 View
  3. Sjöberg V, Tseli E, Monnier A, Westergren J, LoMartire R, Äng B, Hagströmer M, Björk M, Vixner L. Effectiveness of the eVISualisation of physical activity and pain intervention (eVIS) in Swedish Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Programmes: study protocol for a registry-based randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ Open 2022;12(4):e055071 View
  4. Sheng M, Yang J, Bao M, Chen T, Cai R, Zhang N, Chen H, Liu M, Wu X, Zhang B, Liu Y, Chao J. The relationships between step count and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events: A dose–response meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Health Science 2021;10(6):620 View
  5. Giurgiu M, Timm I, Becker M, Schmidt S, Wunsch K, Nissen R, Davidovski D, Bussmann J, Nigg C, Reichert M, Ebner-Priemer U, Woll A, von Haaren-Mack B. Quality Evaluation of Free-living Validation Studies for the Assessment of 24-Hour Physical Behavior in Adults via Wearables: Systematic Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2022;10(6):e36377 View
  6. Chevance G, Golaszewski N, Tipton E, Hekler E, Buman M, Welk G, Patrick K, Godino J. Accuracy and Precision of Energy Expenditure, Heart Rate, and Steps Measured by Combined-Sensing Fitbits Against Reference Measures: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2022;10(4):e35626 View
  7. Gonzales A, Lin J, Cha J. Physical activity changes among office workers during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown and the agreement between objective and subjective physical activity metrics. Applied Ergonomics 2022;105:103845 View
  8. Tseli E, Sjöberg V, Björk M, Äng B, Vixner L, Vega-Muñoz A. Evaluation of content validity and feasibility of the eVISualisation of physical activity and pain (eVIS) intervention for patients with chronic pain participating in interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs. PLOS ONE 2023;18(3):e0282780 View
  9. Kowahl N, Shin S, Barman P, Rainaldi E, Popham S, Kapur R. Accuracy and Reliability of a Suite of Digital Measures of Walking Generated Using a Wrist-Worn Sensor in Healthy Individuals: Performance Characterization Study. JMIR Human Factors 2023;10:e48270 View
  10. Artese A, Rawat R, Sung A. The use of commercial wrist-worn technology to track physiological outcomes in behavioral interventions. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care 2023;26(6):534 View
  11. Ibrahim N, Rampal S, Lee W, Pek E, Suhaimi A. Evaluation of Wrist-Worn Photoplethysmography Trackers with an Electrocardiogram in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease: A Validation Study. Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology 2024;15(1):12 View
  12. Simón-Vicente L, Rodríguez-Fernández A, Rivadeneyra-Posadas J, Soto-Célix M, Raya-González J, Castillo-Alvira D, Calvo S, Mariscal N, García-Bustillo Á, Aguado L, Cubo E. Validation of ActiGraph and Fitbit in the assessment of energy expenditure in Huntington's disease. Gait & Posture 2024;109:89 View
  13. Blondeel A, Devoogdt N, Asnong A, Geraerts I, De Groef A, Heroes A, Van Calster C, Troosters T, Demeyer H, Ginis P, De Vrieze T, Sadek I. Accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers to measure and coach patients with lower limb lymphoedema. PLOS ONE 2024;19(7):e0305768 View
  14. Rosato A, Larsson M, Rullman E, Dual S. Evidence of spontaneous cardiac-locomotor coupling during daily activities in healthy adults. Frontiers in Physiology 2024;15 View
  15. Sjöberg V, Monnier A, Tseli E, LoMartire R, Hagströmer M, Björk M, Äng B, Vixner L. Feasibility and acceptability of design and conduct of a registry-based randomised clinical trial evaluating eVIS as a digital support for physical activity in interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs: A randomised pilot study. DIGITAL HEALTH 2024;10 View