This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Quality Evaluation and Descriptive Analysis/Reviews of Multiple Existing Mobile Apps (377) Usability of Apps and User Perceptions of mHealth (993) mHealth for Data Collection and Research (981) New Methods (963) Podiatry (21)

Published on in Vol 9, No 3 (2021): March

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/24202, first published .
Mobile Apps for Foot Measurement in Pedorthic Practice: Scoping Review

Mobile Apps for Foot Measurement in Pedorthic Practice: Scoping Review

Mobile Apps for Foot Measurement in Pedorthic Practice: Scoping Review

Authors of this article:

Muhammad Ashad Kabir1 Author Orcid Image ;   Sheikh Sowmen Rahman2 Author Orcid Image ;   Mohammad Mainul Islam1, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Sayed Ahmed4, 5, 6, 7 Author Orcid Image ;   Craig Laird6, 7, 8 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (14) Tweetations (3) Metrics

Journals

  1. Jäger M, Eberhardt J, Cunningham D. Experimental Analysis of Commercial Optical Methods for Foot Measurement. Sensors 2022;22(14):5438 View
  2. Rafiq R, Hoque K, Kabir M, Ahmed S, Laird C. OptiFit: Computer-Vision-Based Smartphone Application to Measure the Foot from Images and 3D Scans. Sensors 2022;22(23):9554 View
  3. Thapar G, Biswas T, Bhushan B, Naskar S, Kumar A, Dandapat P, Rokhade J. Accurate estimation of body weight of pigs through smartphone image measurement app. Smart Agricultural Technology 2023;4:100194 View
  4. Siddiqua A, Kabir M, Ferdous T, Ali I, Weston L. Evaluating Plant Disease Detection Mobile Applications: Quality and Limitations. Agronomy 2022;12(8):1869 View
  5. San Emeterio C, Menéndez H, Guillén-Rogel P, Marín P. The reliability of a smartphone application in measuring the foot structure of cyclists during sitting and standing. Footwear Science 2022;14(1):45 View
  6. Samad S, Ahmed F, Naher S, Kabir M, Das A, Amin S, Islam S. Smartphone apps for tracking food consumption and recommendations: Evaluating artificial intelligence-based functionalities, features and quality of current apps. Intelligent Systems with Applications 2022;15:200103 View
  7. Allan J, Munteanu S, Bonanno D, Buldt A, Choppin S, Bullas A, Pearce N, Menz H. Methodological and statistical approaches for the assessment of foot shape using three‐dimensional foot scanning: a scoping review. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2023;16(1) View
  8. Ribaut J, DeVito Dabbs A, Dobbels F, Teynor A, Mess E, Hoffmann T, De Geest S. Developing a Comprehensive List of Criteria to Evaluate the Characteristics and Quality of eHealth Smartphone Apps: Systematic Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2024;12:e48625 View
  9. Karolina Wrześniowska . Shoe Last Customization: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Engineering and Technology Innovation 2023;13(3):230 View
  10. Sinclair R, Nodi S, Kabir M. Evaluating mobile applications for estimating soil properties: Quality of current apps, limitations and future directions. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2024;216:108527 View
  11. Adesiji G, Adelowo J, Komolafe S, Adesiji T. Farmers’ perceived rating and usability attributes of agricultural mobile phone apps. Smart Agricultural Technology 2024;8:100501 View
  12. Kabir M, Samad S, Ahmed F, Naher S, Featherston J, Laird C, Ahmed S. Mobile Apps for Wound Assessment and Monitoring: Limitations, Advancements and Opportunities. Journal of Medical Systems 2024;48(1) View
  13. Li X, Ai X, Wang B, Luo M, Miyamoto A, Kuchay M, Feng D, Zhang C. Application of 3D printing in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: current status and new insights. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2024;12 View