Accessibility settings

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Fitness Trackers and Smart Pedometers/Accelerometers (792) Usability of Apps and User Perceptions of mHealth (1793) Wearable Devices and Sensors (1577) mHealth for Telemedicine and Homecare (865) mHealth for Rehabilitation (562) Postoperative Monitoring and Telemonitoring (244)

Published on in Vol 11 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/44442, first published .
Hands holding smartwatch and phone displaying fitness app progress.

Exploring the Feasibility and Usability of Smartphones for Monitoring Physical Activity in Orthopedic Patients: Prospective Observational Study

Exploring the Feasibility and Usability of Smartphones for Monitoring Physical Activity in Orthopedic Patients: Prospective Observational Study

Authors of this article:

Arash Ghaffari1 Author Orcid Image ;   Rikke Emilie Kildahl Lauritsen1 Author Orcid Image ;   Michael Christensen2 Author Orcid Image ;   Trine Rolighed Thomsen3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Harshit Mahapatra2 Author Orcid Image ;   Robert Heck3 Author Orcid Image ;   Søren Kold1 Author Orcid Image ;   Ole Rahbek1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (7) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Solon-Júnior L, Vieira da Silva Neto L, Lima-Junior D, Costa Y, Klinger da Silva Oliveira J, Fiorese L, Fortes L. “Encephalapp Stroop”: Validity and reliability of a smartphone app to measure cognitive performance in physically active subjects. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult 2026;33(1):219 View
  2. Høpfner Jensen L, Kold S, Dinesen B, Husum H, Skals R, Eiskjær S, Elsøe R, Rahbek O. Team-based digital communication reduced patient-initiated phone calls to the hospital and improved patient satisfaction after orthopedic surgery: a randomized controlled trial in 70 patients. Acta Orthopaedica 2024;95:225 View
  3. Ghaffari A, Kappel A, Jakobsen T, Kold S, Rahbek O. Feasibility of continuous physical activity monitoring: first-month recovery markers following joint replacement surgery. PeerJ 2024;12:e18285 View
  4. Iwasyk A, Gaur S, Federico A, Holash J, Nicholls F, Monument M, Kendal J. Wearable Technology in Orthopaedic Surgery: Applications and Future Directions. JBJS Reviews 2025;13(7) View
  5. Stan I, D’Auria D, Napoletano P. A Systematic Literature Review of Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions in Telemonitoring and Wearable Health Technologies. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 2026;30(3):2630 View
  6. Braun B, Grimm B, Marmor M, Osterhoff G, Back D, Menger M, Vogel C, Histing T, Haas D, Braun B, Marmor M, Yu J, Schroeter S, Osgood G, Acklin Y. Step count as a digital mobility outcome in orthopedics and orthopedic trauma surgery: a scoping review. EFORT Open Reviews 2026;11(2):85 View
  7. Khavari S, D'Ambrose N, Prasad D, Lyman J, Oblich M, Allen M, Prasad N, Roumeliotis A, Sharan A. Assessing the Utility of Pedometer Data in Predicting Spine Surgery Outcomes: A Scoping Review of Clinical Progress. Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation 2026;7(1) View