RefCheck Maintenance Notice

On Monday, December 3, 2018, from 16:00-18:00 EST, RefCheck will be undergoing maintenance. RefCheck is the process where, during copyediting, all references are extracted from the manuscript file, parsed, matched against various databases (eg, PubMed and CrossRef), and automatically corrected. For more information on RefCheck, please visit our Knowledge Base.

Who will be affected?

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 19.09.16 in Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Jul-Sept

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Works citing "Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions"

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/mhealth.6281):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

  1. Smith KC, Michl GL, Katz JN, Losina E. Meteorologic and Geographic Barriers to Physical Activity in a Workplace Wellness Program. Journal of Physical Activity and Health 2018;15(2):108
    CrossRef
  2. Winfree KN, Dominick G. Modeling Clinically Validated Physical Activity Assessments Using Commodity Hardware. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 2018;22(2):335
    CrossRef
  3. Berninger N, ten Hoor G, Plasqui G. Validation of the VitaBit Sit–Stand Tracker: Detecting Sitting, Standing, and Activity Patterns. Sensors 2018;18(3):877
    CrossRef
  4. Stock JM, Pohlig RT, Botieri MJ, Edwards DG, Dominick GM. Heart Rate Equivalency of the Fitbit Charge HR During Continuous Aerobic Exercise. Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour 2018;1(3):122
    CrossRef
  5. Henriksen A, Haugen Mikalsen M, Woldaregay AZ, Muzny M, Hartvigsen G, Hopstock LA, Grimsgaard S. Using Fitness Trackers and Smartwatches to Measure Physical Activity in Research: Analysis of Consumer Wrist-Worn Wearables. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(3):e110
    CrossRef
  6. Liao Y, Schembre S. Acceptability of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Free-Living Healthy Individuals: Implications for the Use of Wearable Biosensors in Diet and Physical Activity Research. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2018;6(10):e11181
    CrossRef
  7. Feehan LM, Geldman J, Sayre EC, Park C, Ezzat AM, Yoo JY, Hamilton CB, Li LC. Accuracy of Fitbit Devices: Systematic Review and Narrative Syntheses of Quantitative Data. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2018;6(8):e10527
    CrossRef
  8. Degroote L, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Verloigne M, Poppe L, Crombez G. The Accuracy of Smart Devices for Measuring Physical Activity in Daily Life: Validation Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2018;6(12):e10972
    CrossRef
  9. Meyer N, Kerz M, Folarin A, Joyce DW, Jackson R, Karr C, Dobson R, MacCabe J. Capturing Rest-Activity Profiles in Schizophrenia Using Wearable and Mobile Technologies: Development, Implementation, Feasibility, and Acceptability of a Remote Monitoring Platform. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2018;6(10):e188
    CrossRef
  10. Migueles JH, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Ortega FB. Critique of: “Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions”. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2017;5(2):e15
    CrossRef
  11. Laranjo L, Lau AYS, Martin P, Tong HL, Coiera E. Use of a mobile social networking intervention for weight management: a mixed-methods study protocol. BMJ Open 2017;7(7):e016665
    CrossRef
  12. Chu AHY, Ng SHX, Paknezhad M, Gauterin A, Koh D, Brown MS, Müller-Riemenschneider F, Buchowski M. Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults. PLOS ONE 2017;12(2):e0172535
    CrossRef
  13. Neil-Sztramko SE, Gotay CC, Sabiston CM, Demers PA, Campbell KC. Feasibility of a telephone and web-based physical activity intervention for women shift workers. Translational Behavioral Medicine 2017;7(2):268
    CrossRef
  14. Sirard JR, Masteller B, Freedson PS, Mendoza A, Hickey A. Validation of Youth Oriented Activity Trackers: Comprehensive Laboratory- and Field-Based Validation. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(7):e250
    CrossRef
  15. Wen D, Zhang X, Liu X, Lei J. Evaluating the Consistency of Current Mainstream Wearable Devices in Health Monitoring: A Comparison Under Free-Living Conditions. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(3):e68
    CrossRef
  16. Schumacher LM, Arigo D, Thomas C. Understanding physical activity lapses among women: responses to lapses and the potential buffering effect of social support. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2017;40(5):740
    CrossRef
  17. Nogic J, Thein PM, Cameron J, Mirzaee S, Ihdayhid A, Nasis A. The utility of personal activity trackers (Fitbit Charge 2) on exercise capacity in patients post acute coronary syndrome [UP-STEP ACS Trial]: a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 2017;17(1)
    CrossRef
  18. Madigan EA. Fitness band accuracy in older community dwelling adults. Health Informatics Journal 2017;:146045821772039
    CrossRef
  19. Wieringa FP, Broers NJH, Kooman JP, Van Der Sande FM, Van Hoof C. Wearable sensors: can they benefit patients with chronic kidney disease?. Expert Review of Medical Devices 2017;14(7):505
    CrossRef
  20. Gorny AW, Liew SJ, Tan CS, Müller-Riemenschneider F. Fitbit Charge HR Wireless Heart Rate Monitor: Validation Study Conducted Under Free-Living Conditions. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2017;5(10):e157
    CrossRef
  21. Dominick GM, Winfree KN, Pohlig RT, Papas MA. Authors’ Reply to: Critique of “Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions” – Does Location of the Device Matter?. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2017;5(2):e13
    CrossRef
  22. Sprint G, Cook D, Weeks D, Dahmen J, La Fleur A. Analyzing Sensor-Based Time Series Data to Track Changes in Physical Activity during Inpatient Rehabilitation. Sensors 2017;17(10):2219
    CrossRef