This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

mHealth for Telemedicine and Homecare (465) Telehealth and Telemonitoring (1851) Mobile Health and Apps for Maternal and Child Health (179)

Published on in Vol 8, No 10 (2020): October

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/18966, first published .
Home-Based Monitoring and Telemonitoring of Complicated Pregnancies: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey of Current Practice in the Netherlands

Home-Based Monitoring and Telemonitoring of Complicated Pregnancies: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey of Current Practice in the Netherlands

Home-Based Monitoring and Telemonitoring of Complicated Pregnancies: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey of Current Practice in the Netherlands

Authors of this article:

Josephus F M van den Heuvel1 Author Orcid Image ;   Samira Ayubi1 Author Orcid Image ;   Arie Franx1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Mireille N Bekker1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (25) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Engeltjes B, Rosman A, Bertens L, Wouters E, Cronie D, Scheele F. Reliability of Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 2021;Volume 14:3247 View
  2. Postel-Vinay N, Shao J, Pinton A, Servais A, Gebara N, Amar L. Home Blood Pressure Measurement and Self-Interpretation of Blood Pressure Readings During Pregnancy: Hy-Result e-Health Prospective Study. Vascular Health and Risk Management 2022;Volume 18:277 View
  3. Li S, Yang Q, Niu S, Liu Y. Effectiveness of Remote Fetal Monitoring on Maternal-Fetal Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2023;11:e41508 View
  4. Yeh P, Rhee D, Kennedy C, Zera C, Lucido B, Tunçalp Ö, Gomez Ponce de Leon R, Narasimhan M. Self-monitoring of blood pressure among women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2022;22(1) View
  5. Tamaru S, Jwa S, Ono Y, Seki H, Matsui H, Fujii T, Iriyama T, Doi K, Sameshima H, Naruse K, Kobayashi H, Yoshida R, Nishi H, Hirata Y, Fukushima K, Hirakawa T, Nakano Y, Asakawa Y, Tsunoda Y, Oda T, Nii S, Fujii T, Kinoshita K, Kamei Y. Feasibility of a mobile cardiotocogram device for fetal heart rate self‐monitoring in low‐risk singleton pregnant women. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2022;48(2):385 View
  6. Novoa R, Meza-Santibañez L, Melgarejo W, Huang-Yang X, Guevara-Ríos E, Torres-Osorio J, Aponte-Laban R, Jáuregui-Canchari V, Rodríguez-Hilario N, Ventura W. Maternal Perinatal Telemonitoring in the Context of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic in a Tertiary Health Center in Peru. American Journal of Perinatology 2022;39(15):1711 View
  7. Gijsbers H, Feenstra T, Eminovic N, van Dam D, Nurmohamed S, van de Belt T, Schijven M. Enablers and barriers in upscaling telemonitoring across geographic boundaries: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2022;12(4):e057494 View
  8. Feroz A, De Vera K, D Bragagnolo N, Saleem S, Bhutta Z, Seto E. Understanding the Needs of a Mobile Phone–Based Telemonitoring Program for Pregnant Women at High Risk for Pre-Eclampsia: Interpretive Qualitative Description Study. JMIR Formative Research 2022;6(2):e32428 View
  9. Metoki H, Iwama N, Hamada H, Satoh M, Murakami T, Ishikuro M, Obara T. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: definition, management, and out-of-office blood pressure measurement. Hypertension Research 2022;45(8):1298 View
  10. Sentilhes L, Schmitz T, Arthuis C, Barjat T, Berveiller P, Camilleri C, Froeliger A, Garabedian C, Guerby P, Korb D, Lecarpentier E, Mattuizzi A, Sibiude J, Sénat M, Tsatsaris V. La pré-éclampsie : recommandations pour la pratique clinique du Collège national des gynécologues obstétriciens français. Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie 2024;52(1):3 View
  11. Faezi A, Afshar H, Rahimi B. Identifying factors that affect the use of health information technology in the treatment and management of hypertension. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2023;23(1) View
  12. Aasbø G, Staff A, Blix E, Pay A, Waldum Å, Rivedal S, Solbrække K. Expectations related to home‐based telemonitoring of high‐risk pregnancies: A qualitative study addressing healthcare providers' and users' views in Norway. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2024;103(2):276 View
  13. Tabibzadeh M, Shivakumar A. Systemic Analysis of Barriers of High Quality of Care in Telemonitoring: Integrating the Seips Framework and Fault Tree Analysis. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2023;67(1):626 View
  14. Jepsen I, Nielsen J, Eriksen S, Maimburg R. How pregnant women with diabetes experience telemonitoring of the fetal heart rate – An interview study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2024;298:123 View
  15. Bendix J, Heinsen M, Backhausen M. “But I’m not a professional” − How women with high-risk pregnancies voice the experiences of home-based telemonitoring; a qualitative interview study. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare 2024;41:101015 View
  16. Nielsen J, Jepsen I, Eriksen S, Maimburg R. Development and early implementation of telemonitoring of complicated pregnancies – A qualitative study with the perspectives of health professionals. Midwifery 2024;138:104149 View
  17. de Souza Ferreira E, de Oliveira A, Dias M, da Costa G, Januário J, Botelho G, Cotta R. Mobile solution and chronic diseases: development and implementation of a mobile application and digital platform for collecting, analyzing data, monitoring and managing health care. BMC Health Services Research 2024;24(1) View
  18. Evans C, Clancy G, Evans K, Booth A, Nazmeen B, Sunney C, Clowes M, Jones N, Timmons S, Spiby H. Optimising digital clinical consultations in maternity care: a realist review and implementation principles. BMJ Open 2024;14(10):e079153 View
  19. Cnossen M, Spaan J, Fleischmann M, van der Geest B, Ista E, Hulzebos C, Been J, van der Vliet – Torij H. Home phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: current practices and attitudes. Pediatric Research 2024 View
  20. Story L, Nana M, Hall M, Fitzgerald A, Brockwell G, Oteng-Ntim E, Clarke S, Challacombe F, Nelson-Piercy C, Shennan A. The role of virtual wards in maternity in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2025;305:228 View
  21. Axelrod M, Lahav Ezra H, Galler E, Nir O, Ofir K, Barkai G, Sivan E, Mazaki‐Tovi S, Tsur A. Hybrid remote and in‐clinic maternal‐fetal surveillance for women with gestational diabetes: A prospective pilot study. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2025 View
  22. Alderson B, Osman A, El-Sayed M, Essa K. Labour diagnostics using the intrauterine pressure through sound waves emitted by a smartphone. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 2025 View
  23. Lovers A, Daumer M, Frasch M, Ugwumadu A, Warrick P, Vullings R, Pini N, Tolladay J, Petersen O, Lederer C, Yang L, Djurić P, Abtahi F, Holzmann M, Boudet S, de l'Aulnoit A, Georgieva A. Advancements in Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: A Report on Opportunities and Strategic Initiatives for Better Intrapartum Care. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2025 View
  24. Spaan J, van der Geest B, Been J, Hulzebos C, Ista E. Barriers and facilitators to implementation of home phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia: Perspectives from healthcare professionals and parents. Midwifery 2025;144:104356 View
  25. Jepsen I, Nielsen J, Eriksen S, Maimburg R. “Being at home instead of going to the hospital is Great” − how partners experience telemonitoring of the fetal heart rate during pregnancy – A qualitative interview study. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare 2025;44:101098 View