This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Wearable Devices and Sensors (825) Digital Health Reviews (1191) Digital Biomarkers and Digital Phenotyping (178) mHealth in a Clinical Setting (582) Wearables and MHealth Reviews (260) Novel Sensors and Data Acquisition Methods in Cardiology (191) Fitness Trackers and Smart Pedometers/Accelerometers (543) Sleep Monitoring, Sleep Quality, Sleep Disorders (170) Falls and Emergency Detection with Sensors and other Technologies (28)

Published on in Vol 9, No 8 (2021): August

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/17411, first published .
Evaluating the Validity and Utility of Wearable Technology for Continuously Monitoring Patients in a Hospital Setting: Systematic Review

Evaluating the Validity and Utility of Wearable Technology for Continuously Monitoring Patients in a Hospital Setting: Systematic Review

Evaluating the Validity and Utility of Wearable Technology for Continuously Monitoring Patients in a Hospital Setting: Systematic Review

Authors of this article:

Vikas Patel1 Author Orcid Image ;   Ani Orchanian-Cheff2 Author Orcid Image ;   Robert Wu1, 3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (21) Tweetations (4) Metrics

Journals

  1. Helmer P, Hottenrott S, Rodemers P, Leppich R, Helwich M, Pryss R, Kranke P, Meybohm P, Winkler B, Sammeth M. Accuracy and Systematic Biases of Heart Rate Measurements by Consumer-Grade Fitness Trackers in Postoperative Patients: Prospective Clinical Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(12):e42359 View
  2. Neely L, Carnett A, Quarles J, MacNaul H, Park S, Oyama S, Chen G, Desai K, Najafirad P. The Case for Integrated Advanced Technology in Applied Behavior Analysis. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders 2023;7(3):415 View
  3. Huh K, Jeong S, Yoo H, Piao M, Ryu H, Kim H, Yoon Y, Seong S, Lee S, Kim K. Lessons from a multicenter clinical trial with an approved wearable electrocardiogram: issues and practical considerations. Translational and Clinical Pharmacology 2022;30(2):87 View
  4. Hamasaki H. Daily Physical Activity and Sleep Measured by Wearable Activity Trackers during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Lesson for Preventing Physical Inactivity during Future Pandemics. Applied Sciences 2021;11(21):9956 View
  5. Berger S, Baria A. Assessing Pain Research: A Narrative Review of Emerging Pain Methods, Their Technosocial Implications, and Opportunities for Multidisciplinary Approaches. Frontiers in Pain Research 2022;3 View
  6. Paulauskaite-Taraseviciene A, Siaulys J, Sutiene K, Petravicius T, Navickas S, Oliandra M, Rapalis A, Balciunas J. Geriatric Care Management System Powered by the IoT and Computer Vision Techniques. Healthcare 2023;11(8):1152 View
  7. Turan A, Khanna A, Brooker J, Saha A, Clark C, Samant A, Ozcimen E, Pu X, Ruetzler K, Sessler D. Association Between Mobilization and Composite Postoperative Complications Following Major Elective Surgery. JAMA Surgery 2023;158(8):825 View
  8. Wosny M, Strasser L, Hastings J. Experience of Health Care Professionals Using Digital Tools in the Hospital: Qualitative Systematic Review. JMIR Human Factors 2023;10:e50357 View
  9. Mayer J, Jose R, Kurgansky G, Singh P, Coletti C, Devine T, Toma M. Evaluating the Feasibility of Euler Angles for Bed-Based Patient Movement Monitoring. Signals 2023;4(4):788 View
  10. Garssen S, Kant N, Vernooij C, Mauritz G, Koning M, Bosch F, Doggen C. Continuous monitoring of patients in and after the acute admission ward to improve clinical pathways: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (Optimal-AAW). Trials 2023;24(1) View
  11. Ibrahim N, Lee W, Rampal S, Suhaimi A. Integrating the wrist-worn tracker in cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a scoping review. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 2023;30(10):1 View
  12. Razek A. Assessment of a Functional Electromagnetic Compatibility Analysis of Near-Body Medical Devices Subject to Electromagnetic Field Perturbation. Electronics 2023;12(23):4780 View
  13. Sharone M, Muhtaroglu A. Patient-Centered Design Method for Self-Powered and Cost-Optimized Health Monitors. IEEE Access 2023;11:125055 View
  14. Wong A, Tso W, Su J, Hui V, Chow K, Wong S, Wong B, Wong F, Fukumoto Y. Effectiveness of support from community health workers on the sustained use of a wearable monitoring device among community-dwelling older adults: A randomized trial protocol. PLOS ONE 2023;18(12):e0294517 View
  15. Babu M, Lautman Z, Lin X, Sobota M, Snyder M. Wearable Devices: Implications for Precision Medicine and the Future of Health Care. Annual Review of Medicine 2024;75(1):401 View
  16. Wosny M, Strasser L, Hastings J. The Paradoxes of Digital Tools in Hospitals: Qualitative Interview Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e56095 View
  17. Kant N, Garssen S, Vernooij C, Mauritz G, Koning M, Bosch F, Doggen C. Enhancing discharge decision-making through continuous monitoring in an acute admission ward: a randomized controlled trial. Internal and Emergency Medicine 2024;19(4):1051 View
  18. Youn S, Ki M, Abdelhamid M, Pack S. Biomimetic Materials for Skin Tissue Regeneration and Electronic Skin. Biomimetics 2024;9(5):278 View
  19. Choo Y, Lee G, Moon J, Chang M. Application of non-contact sensors for health monitoring in hospitals: a narrative review. Frontiers in Medicine 2024;11 View
  20. Razek A. Interaction of electromagnetic fields with body-onboard devices. Exploration of Digital Health Technologies 2024:124 View
  21. Ikuta K, Aishima M, Noguchi-Watanabe M, Fukui S. Feasibility of monitoring heart and respiratory rates using non-wearable devices and consistency of the measured parameters: A pilot feasibility study (Preprint). JMIR Human Factors 2024 View