Published on in Vol 13 (2025)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/54871, first published .
Reliability and Accuracy of the Fitbit Charge 4 Photoplethysmography Heart Rate Sensor in Ecological Conditions: Validation Study

Reliability and Accuracy of the Fitbit Charge 4 Photoplethysmography Heart Rate Sensor in Ecological Conditions: Validation Study

Reliability and Accuracy of the Fitbit Charge 4 Photoplethysmography Heart Rate Sensor in Ecological Conditions: Validation Study

Journals

  1. de Leon M, Camic C, Herring M, Hill C. Validity and Inter-Device Reliability of the OTBeat BurnTM Monitor to Estimate Heart Rate During Exercise. Sports 2025;13(2):49 View
  2. Murai F, So R, Matsuo T. Self-assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness: evaluation of reliability and validity of a step test eliminating a step board. European Journal of Applied Physiology 2025;125(10):2999 View
  3. Kang M, Yoon H. Effect of urban green infrastructure on psychological and physiological responses under outdoor heat exposure: An experimental study. Building and Environment 2026;287:113811 View
  4. Rubio M, Novak R, Tratnik J, Kontić D, Bučar G, Kocman D. Urban Cycling Lab: A citizen science protocol for assessing and reducing exposure to environmental stressors among bike commuters. MethodsX 2025;15:103657 View
  5. Jiao Y. Validity and challenges of optical heart rate sensors in real-time classification of exercise intensity zones. Sensor Review 2026:1 View
  6. Martín-Ruiz J, Ruiz-Sanchis L. Agreement Between Reserve Heart Rate, Perceived Exertion and Wint Index During HIIT Using a Low-Cost ANT+ Armband in University Students. Sensors 2026;26(3):1049 View